498

The United Nations General Assembly voted 124-14 on Wednesday to strip Israel of the right to self-defense in the West Bank, Gaza and east Jerusalem.

The test of the resolution was based on the International Court of Justice’s advisory opinion in July that Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territory was illegal.

The resolution also calls on member states not to sell arms or military equipment to Israel that would be used in Gaza, the West Bank, and east Jerusalem.

Among the 43 countries that abstained were Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom. Some 12 of the 27 European Union countries abstained, including Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Lithuania, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Sweden.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Enkrod@feddit.org 1 points 7 minutes ago

Germany abstaining is actually a big deal.

The defense of Israel is one of our "Reason of State" and not voting in favour of Israel is a serious signal that politicians are fed up with Netanyahus bullshit.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

Israel and Kyle Rittenhouse can agree on one thing, it's totally cool to kill people and then pretend you were defending yourself

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

What a shitty title and crappy biased article. That's not what the resolution was about.

Here's the Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/09/19/un-resolution-israel-palestinian-territory-countries-vote/

U.N. General Assembly demands Israel end occupation of Palestinian territory The nonbinding resolution says Israel must end its “unlawful presence” within a year, pull out military forces, halt settlement expansion and evacuate settlers.

[-] Neon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Lemmy.ml

What was i expecting?

[-] wheelsbot@lemm.ee 18 points 6 hours ago

Israel is illegally occupying Palestine. The violence they commit is the furthest possible thing from self defense.

[-] PanArab@lemmy.ml 16 points 11 hours ago

They never had that right to begin with. A foreign military force has no right to self defense from the occupied people.

[-] HowMany@lemmy.ml 44 points 16 hours ago

It's not self defense when they're the ones attacking.

[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 43 points 19 hours ago

Ashamed that my country abstained here

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Jollyllama@lemmy.world 20 points 17 hours ago

Is this just symbolic? Does it levy any penalties for not complying?

[-] Eiim@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 17 hours ago

The resolution has declaratory power only but provides international backing to those countries that want to take additional steps against Israel.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 15 points 19 hours ago

And nobody will obey that decision.

ICJ has made some rulings about Artsakh too. Should have been not so hard to sanction the beheading savages out of occupying a small country and expelling its residents. By the way, in the UN charter a "country" does not only refer to UN members, that distinction is intentionally made clear in a few places.

UN is less useful than Holy Roman Empire.

[-] rando895@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 18 hours ago

I think many will obey the decision, just not the USA, Canada, terf island, the E.U., you know the usual culprits for not following international law.

[-] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 2 points 17 hours ago

Is terf island GB?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] erenkoylu@lemmy.ml 20 points 23 hours ago

We need to expel Israel from the UN. These religious fanatics have no place in the civilized world.

[-] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 31 points 20 hours ago

Removing a country from the UN for doing horrible things would defeat the UN's entire purpose.

[-] Aqarius@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

IDK, FRY was de facto kicked out of the UN in 1992.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Allero@lemmy.today 13 points 19 hours ago

Part of any international sanctions is to leave something for the perpetrator to lose.

Otherwise, they can do literally everything without any further consequences whatsoever - it won't get worse for them.

Also, as rightfully mentioned, part of UN's goal is restoring peace between nations, which is harder to do when they are not members. That's the problem with Palestine, and it will get worse if Israel leaves too.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 28 points 1 day ago

The headline is genocide apologia and should be banned.

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 21 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

The entire article is utter apologetic trash, doing its absolute best to show how unpopular this decision is (despite being hugely popular) and focusing on "Hamas terrorism concerns" without any consideration at all given to Palestinians.

[-] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 124 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Why list a select 15 abstainers in the summary rather than the 14 voting against? Besides the obvious ones (Israel, US, Czechia), there's Hungary, Argentina, Paraguay, Papua New Guinea, Fiji, Palau, Nauru, Malawi, Tuvalu, Tonga and Micronesia.

[-] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 19 points 22 hours ago

Why do all the Polynesian countries support Israel so strongly?

[-] Eiim@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

The COFA states are very strongly aligned with the US and pretty much always vote with them. I don't know much about, say, Tonga, but I'm guessing it's a way of signaling cooperation to the US as well.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 32 points 22 hours ago

They nearly always follow USA in voting, so Israel gets supported indirectly.

[-] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 16 points 20 hours ago

Cheap votes to buy or bully. Simply too poor to afford a conscience.

[-] glaber@lemm.ee 15 points 1 day ago
[-] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It is possible none of us will live to see Czechia vote against the interest of Israel as all parties support it and there is pretty much no organized pro-Palestine movement. Israel says we're their top partners in the eastern hemisphere, which means a lot because most countries are in the eastern hemisphere, including itself. At least, aid toward them is not nearly as popular among politicians and citizens as for Ukraine (we have a sizable, well-behaved Ukrainian minority already and took the most refugees per capita at the height of the crisis).

As for why pretty much every politician is either oblivious or bootlicking Israel: see my comment under a post about the shredder escapade 4 months ago

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] eunieisthebus@feddit.org 2 points 17 hours ago

Weird that the comments and the top level post are calling out the countries which abstained but apperently no one cares about the 'against' votes.

[-] exanime@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago

I think it may be due to the "against" votes coming from the obvious places (Israel, USA) and a bunch of tiny places most people couldn't point in a map.

The "curious" ones for me are Panama and Argentina. Curious as in I wonder what their statements to vote against would be

[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 hours ago

Argentina is an obvious one. Milei is a giant US bootlicker.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
498 points (95.6% liked)

World News

32078 readers
859 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS