378

The six-year-old student who shot his teacher in the US earlier this year, boasted about the incident saying "I shot [her] dead", unsealed court documents show.

While being restrained after the shooting at a Virginia school, the boy is said to have admitted "I did it", adding "I got my mom's gun last night".

His teacher, Abigail "Abby" Zwerner - who survived - filed a $40m (£31.4m) lawsuit earlier this year.

The boy has not been charged.

The boy's mother, however, Deja Taylor, has been charged with felony child neglect and misdemeanour recklessly leaving a loaded firearm as to endanger a child.

In Ms Zwerner's lawsuit, filed in April, she accuses school officials of gross negligence for ignoring warning signs and argues the defendants knew the child "had a history of random violence

The documents also mention another incident with the same student while he was in kindergarten. A retired teacher told police he started "choking her to the point she could not breathe".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 12 points 1 year ago

So two observations, first how is leaving a loaded gun in reach of a 6 year old not more than a misdemeanor? I don't even let my kid near a slingshot or pelet gun unsupervised much less anything lethal.

Second, "choking her to the point she could not breath"? How big is this kid that this is even possible? That's no small feat for a full grown adult if you're talking bare handed much less a young child.

That the kid at that age even thought that was a thing to do says all too much about the influences on them. We need another Mr. Rogers here...

[-] gamer@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Second, “choking her to the point she could not breath”? How big is this kid that this is even possible? That’s no small feat for a full grown adult if you’re talking bare handed much less a young child.

I assume it was an old lady because the article mentions it was a retired teacher. Considering the kid has only been alive 6 years, it probably happened the year prior, so if the teacher was able to retire that soon after, they probably were in their 90s or early hundos

[-] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 1 points 1 year ago

That's possible, to that end the pre-school my youngest attended had a rule of two teachers per class so at any given time one could lead the class and the other watch for troubles since young kids can be volatile at times if they want something right now. Not good if the kid is that misguided to the point of outright violence, but at the same time kids will climb the cubbords sometimes and you need to be able to take them off or catch them if they fall. If the teacher is not physically capable of that then they need an assistant in the room.

[-] OddFed@feddit.de -5 points 1 year ago

That's exactly the rhetoric that makes it so hard for men to talk about domestic violence.

[-] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 1 points 1 year ago
[-] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I think he's objecting to "why couldn't you stop someone smaller and weaker from abusing you?".

[-] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Maybe, but there's stopping an adult with an actual intent to harm you versus just picking up someone you could probabbly carry under one arm. At some point if you can't do that well, please don't get a large dog or such for a pet I guess?

Additionally, the thought was more 'how can a kid that small even muster the strength to strangle someone to begin with'.

[-] OddFed@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The point is that it's not about "strength". And no matter your intend, as long as you picture such events as "whoever is physically stronger wins", you are destructive.

Why do you think it's hard for a man to fight back a female partner?

Why do you think it's hard for a teacher to fight back one of their pupils?

How easy is it for those people to talk about this trauma, if people like you go: "I don't understand how you can be threatend by someone you can pick up under your arm lmao."?

[-] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 2 points 1 year ago

So I'm not inclined to get drug off on some distraction with an easily offended sort over the morally correct phrasing or how one should think, but I'll put it as this.

1: Abuse comes in many forms, not just physical, focusing the notion of keeping it secret and being difficult to talk about on the one most outwardly visible face of it detracts from the larger battles happening in the emotive and mental abuse space.

2: There is a material difference in physical assault perpetuated by an adult or mature child which has a level of malice and intent behind it and that done by a child which, although I'm speculating since it's not listed, would have been doing this bare handed and without a properly formed mindset to fully comprehend their own actions. A small child at that age likely weighs somewhere under 60 pounds and has hands of relevant size. At some point a person simply needs to be able to fend for themselves or be considered incapable of dealing with a situation, be that in physically resisting or in correcting the behavior of the kid to begin with.

A teacher shouldn't have to plan for a kid bringing a gun to class, that's fully on the parents being negligent, but if you work with kids, particularly young ones that haven't properly learned control of their emotions yet, it should be expected that you're going to get kicked in the shins here and again and be capable and prepared to deal with that.

this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
378 points (97.5% liked)

News

22890 readers
3755 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS