84
submitted 1 month ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 1 month ago

As seen in Nagasaki and Hiroshima

[-] barrbaric@hexbear.net 13 points 1 month ago

IIRC the damage inflicted by the atomic bombings weren't especially noteworthy compared to the rest of the bombing campaign, and it was more a way to test out their new toys. If the nukes hadn't been used but conventional bombing had continued, it would likely have had a similar result. This video by Shaun lays out a pretty compelling case that the Japanese surrender was due to the Soviet declaration of war and invasion of Manchuria.

This is all ignoring of course that despite the insistence of unconditional surrender, the Americans accepted surrender with conditions and allowed the emperor to continue to hold his titles anyway. There's definitely something to be said about taking maximalist positions just to make a point even when they don't actually care about several of the goals that make up those positions.

[-] LemmeAtEm@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago

it was more a way to test out their new toys.

And as a demonstration for any would-be challengers (one in particular, and we all know who) to the emerging US hegemonic dominance, a demonstration not just of the destructive capacity of nukes but of their willingness to use it.

[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Are you saying that using nukes against civilian populations was equivalent to conventional bombing because of "the damage"? What point are you trying to make here?

[-] barrbaric@hexbear.net 3 points 1 month ago

The point is that Nagasaki and Hiroshima weren't exceptional, but rather typical of US bombing strategies against civilian populations that the US has continued to use into the modern day.

[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 month ago

I would say that by the very nature of it being nukes it was exceptional. Like, the very definition of exceptional. Yes, the USA often bombs instead of negotiating, that is not exceptional.

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

The fire bombing of civilians were terrible and shouldn't be forgotten in the shade of the mushroom cloud.

[-] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 month ago

IIRC the damage inflicted by the atomic bombings weren’t especially noteworthy compared to the rest of the bombing campaign

It should also be of note that it would terrify the people of NK, the atom bomb dropping on Japan was a cultural milestone for them.

this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
84 points (74.7% liked)

World News

32283 readers
748 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS