I would suggest you also try to find different perspectives on how people got different opinions on the subject

No offense, but; oh, please.

I find it extremely annoying that people pretend as if I've not listened to or considered the "different opinions". If it even was different opinions. It never really is. That's my point. People don't really form an opinion of the subject as an aversion to it. If I could just relay my personal experiences to you. The frustration of politely bringing the topic up pretty much always ends in people getting extremely upset. And I've worked customer service for decades. I know how to be polite.

I don't need to accept the asinine propaganda being touted as someone's opinion. Like the "I don't want my doctor being high" shit. It's almost as disrespectfully asinine as "if people do LSD, they'll peel themselves as oranges or try to fly by jumping of high rise buildings". No respectable doctor is someone who goes to work high. And if they're a doctor who's not respectable and have a drug issue, they shouldn't be a doctor, but those doctors exist currently. And according to actual science we have on the issue, reforming drug laws to be more liberal really works on addicts, so legalising drugs will actually make it less likely your doctor would be high. Doctors have access to pharmaceuticals all the time, so why on Earth would they need to wait for them to be legal? Them being legal wouldn't make it okay for them to be under the influence at work, just like it's not okay for them to be under the influence now.

See. I have considered their "opinions". More than they have. And that's my issue with it. People get somewhat upset, and then say "have you considered", when it's literally them who are refusing to even consider my side.

If anything, your opinion/facts are discarded quicker

That is a myth as well, btw. Well, according to the flimsy research we have.

What is true however, is that some people will sometimes (or most of the time) perceive neutral attitudes as hostile ones. Unfortunately, not my issue. Where I live, we speak directly. It's in our culture.

However, for that one guy, I'm not really being neutral towards. But this comment, for instance, is completely neutral.

You know who appears too emotionally connected to a subject? People who can't even consider something else than what someone programmed into their brain through shitty propaganda, because they get extremely emotionally upset if they even try.

It's a cold hard fact that prohibition of drugs is extremely harmful towards the planet, and any sort of even indirect defense of it or defense of aversion towards discussing it is bad for the world in the long run.

Imagine if you were suddenly transported to say to the 1800's or something. Imagine how annoyed and disgusted you would be with people who'd get annoyed (or even downright violent) at you for you trying to talk about how chattel slavery is bad.

edit oh I forgot to mention, there's one person that I actually managed to completely convert during a single night. He began touting 60's propaganda. (Literally, he was like 70 or something at the time and this was in 2011 or something.) He was the president of the local Mensa. (Any my coworker, he worked part time essentially.) He actually considered my points. It took a while to get through the propaganda, but once I just posed the same simple questions enough times (and after a bottle of Jägermeister) he suddenly stopped at one point when he was raising his finger in protest, then froze, looked somewhere far and was like. "Huh. I think you got me with that one." And that's how you recognise intelligence. He actually listened, unlike 99% of the population with that extreme aversion to the whole topic.