124
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Robert_Kennedy_Jr@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

https://archive.ph/tR7s6

Get fuuuuuuuuuuuuuucked

“This isn’t going to stop,” Allen told the New York Times. “Art is dead, dude. It’s over. A.I. won. Humans lost.”

"But I still want to get paid for it."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 38 points 1 week ago

But I still want to get paid for it

If only there was an economic system that made it so he could make a good living regardless of the output of his work... soviet-hmm

[-] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

At the end of the day, I think this is the important thing. Arguments about IP and how AI (or AI "artists") affect artists are understandable, but are missing the forest for the trees.

There's one, singular reason art isn't well recognised nor compensated: Capitalism. And so long as it exists, no attitude or approach to AI, no purity filter, no level of enforcement of IP law, is going to effectively protect artists and meaningfully allow them to pursue their work.

this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
124 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13483 readers
887 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS