124

"Famous" AI Artist Says He's Losing Millions of Dollars From People Stealing His Work (gizmodo.com)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Robert_Kennedy_Jr@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

103 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://archive.ph/tR7s6

Get fuuuuuuuuuuuuuucked

“This isn’t going to stop,” Allen told the New York Times. “Art is dead, dude. It’s over. A.I. won. Humans lost.”

"But I still want to get paid for it."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] yoink@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

exist in part to belittle actual artists for the sake of boosting the treat printers (or the treat printer prompters) to artist status

that's what's so insane to me. for the longest time, STEM folk were all about 'artists aren't worth respecting' 'oh arts degree? just put the fries in the bag lmao'

then suddenly AI art comes about and then it's 'look at my art! AI makes better art than anyone and it's imperative we dump everything into it! you must respect my AI art! you must treat me like an artiste'

and now that it's clear it's a grift, it's 'art is dead, we will never beat AI, artists are back to not worth respecting'

once again, tourists visiting every creative medium they can to try and find fresh rubes for their machine

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

then suddenly AI art comes about and then it's 'look at my art! AI makes better art than anyone and it's imperative we dump everything into it! you must respect my AI art! you must treat me like an artiste'

I've seen that shit here too. Today.

I think the ideological core of it is the boosters want cheap treats, or even want to feel like artists as "prompt engineers," and refuse to even acknowledge the costs and consequences and would rather shit on working-class artists, writers, and other imperiled people that are supposed to be comrades. No leftist I can respect goes there.