546
House rule
(itsgoingdown.org)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
546 points (99.3% liked)
196
16359 readers
2342 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I would like some houses without people. Having a little surplus is usually a good thing. So like if some houses become unlivable, we have houses for the suddenly unhoused people.
I guess they mean it from a sustainability perspective. Stop building homes that aren't being used to house people, ie, stop building homes for speculators.
But then the house will be lonely :(
Run it as a pet café. In the above-mentioned emergency, people can move in, but they have to foster the pets.
That's perfect. I'm voting for you for king of the world
no houses without people while there's people without houses
That part of things could be aimed a China. They have something like double the amount of housing their population needs. To someone in a country with out of control housing prices, that might sound like a good problem to have, but it's still wasteful.