562
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 133 points 1 month ago

That weird American obsession over men's height.

[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone 39 points 1 month ago
[-] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 1 month ago

In Europe too. Pretty sure it exists everywhere, just like other beauty standards.

[-] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Yep I live in the Netherlands as a 5’6” guy. So many insecure short women here who only want men that are 2 meters all. My height is so much more of an issue with women who are shorter than me than women who are my same height or slightly taller.

[-] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I mean, if you're not over 6', are you even from the Netherlands? /lh

[-] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

well my genes are from one of the former colonies. My short stature will tell you which colony that is.

[-] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

Sorry I'm not that educated on the Dutch colonies. I only know about Suriname.

[-] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

I've literally never heard of a woman talking about "I don't date men under X height" in my entire life. Then again I'd never even talk with a woman like that in the first place.

I've certainly noticed the trend of smaller girls always gravitating towards taller men, but nothing so silly as "I don't date small men". As a small guy myself, I actually dated a few tall girls without issue, and happily married to a lady two inches taller than me.

As I always say : my height isn't the dimension you're gonna care about, once we are lying down.

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 22 points 1 month ago

I'm 5'3 and have dated taller girls but I've seen them get shit from their friends for being with a short guy. They'd say it right in front of me too. Some people really are assholes about it.

[-] babybus@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago

This probably comes from Tinder, where people explicitly state their preferences. I also don't know anyone in real life who talks about that. These are two very different environments. But keep in mind that romantic and sexual interests are not always conscious choices. People might not even be aware of them, yet your height can still affect their desire to be with you (among many other things).

[-] Maalus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Preferences are bullcrap most of the time anyways. Only truly shallow people go completely off of looks and are looking for a 100% match to them. Had seen plenty of bios saying stuff like "I'm crazy about tall men with beards". Sent a message saying "how bout short men with beards?" And the response was "aye, I can do that" directly referencing lotr lol

[-] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Never thought about it this way, since I've never used dating apps. That makes sense, though. Thanks for the insight.

And I agree about unconscious choices; that's why I mentioned small girls with huge guys. The stereotype is so common, yet rarely, when I asked, were the girls even aware of it. My money has always been on daddy issues for this particular one.

[-] WeLoveCastingSpellz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

some people just like taller people. I like tall women for instance. no need to put each other down over it.

[-] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

No hate! I've just always found it curious :)

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Also tinder tends towards pickiness partly as a way of thinning the herd. It’s very easy for dating apps to take nice to haves and push them into requirements. Things you may demand there might be a lot less important with someone you were chatting with at a social event and felt a spark with.

[-] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago

they may not say it out loud, but I think there's quite a few women that prefer taller men

besides, there's nothing wrong with having such preferences, as long as you don't denigrate the people who don't fit your preferences

[-] Estebiu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

As I always say : my height isn't the dimension you're gonna care about, once we are lying down.

Im dying

[-] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago

Tall is the big titties of men.

[-] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

more like the being skinny of men

[-] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago

Nah, you can control your weight more than you can control your height or tiddy size

[-] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

no it's not a universal beauty standard

[-] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And you know, the rest of the western world.

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

We only use metric to seem taller. 186cm (and counting)

[-] Fizz@lemmy.nz -1 points 1 month ago

Thanks to America

[-] orangeboats@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately not just America. Heightism is also prevalent in a big part of Asia.

This is most likely one of the quirks brought to you by Survival of the Fittest rule. Thanks, evolution.

[-] Kalladblog@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago

Don't blame evolution for some peoples' short sightedness

[-] dwindling7373@feddit.it 13 points 1 month ago

I see what you did there, despite evolution.

[-] orangeboats@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Well, tallness surely would be a preferable criteria back then! To a certain extent, it is a proxy parameter for fitness.

I just think we can actually use evolution to explain a lot of things that we do, it doesn't mean we should do it.

[-] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

In an evolutionary context, what does "should" mean?

[-] orangeboats@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

In the past, fitness (and hence its proxy parameters like height and other beauty standards) correlated to the survivability of your bloodline. So it makes sense that people are programmed, to a certain degree, to admire things like tallness.

Nowadays because of technology the correlation no longer exists, or at the very least it is much diminished. But the programming is still there right in our DNA, so as a people we should artificially override this natural instinct because it no longer serves a purpose.

[-] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Sexual selection is still a thing, and not to push eugenics or anything, but shouldn't people be somewhat discerning regarding the genetic health of their partner? I mean, we're still a ways out from using CRISPR to fix inheritable weaknesses, but until then, keep slamming shorties but save your baby-making for a tall Amazonian, right?

this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
562 points (97.8% liked)

Greentext

4486 readers
1052 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS