143
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Guamer@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

This is based on 43 states being considered "non-negotiable" and "set in stone" while only 7 are considered "swing" states

Also consider I specified "voters", who are at best only 2/3 of the total population, which leaves out about 100 million extra people

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago

"If you don't like the candidates, vote for the person most likely to implement ranked choice voting and then campaign to get it adopted!" ~I\ personally\ am\ fine\ with\ the\ status\ quo\ and\ will\ do\ nothing\ to\ help\ but\ good\ luck\ out\ there\ kiddo.~

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 month ago

vote for the person most likely to implement ranked choice voting

So, Claudia de la Cruz?

[-] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago

No, silly, she can't win because it has been foreordained as such.

this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
143 points (98.6% liked)

chapotraphouse

13538 readers
1022 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS