785

Announcement by the creator: https://forum.syncthing.net/t/discontinuing-syncthing-android/23002

Unfortunately I don’t have good news on the state of the android app: I am retiring it. The last release on Github and F-Droid will happen with the December 2024 Syncthing version.

Reason is a combination of Google making Play publishing something between hard and impossible and no active maintenance. The app saw no significant development for a long time and without Play releases I do no longer see enough benefit and/or have enough motivation to keep up the ongoing maintenance an app requires even without doing much, if any, changes.

Thanks a lot to everyone who ever contributed to this app!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] xodoh74984@lemmy.world 143 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This is sad. Google Play should never hold this much weight in the self hosted community. For Android users dedicated to open source software, F-Droid is the target.

I don't think SyncThing users would have much issue with the app disappearing from Google. Doing away with Google is the goal.

[-] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 57 points 1 month ago

The problem is not "Syncthing users" it is the others that we bring along with us.

I already have F-Droid on my phone, but the dozen others that I have promoted Syncthing to over the years do not. This is going to cause a bunch of problems.

This is much more important than what you portray here.

[-] tychosmoose@lemm.ee 32 points 1 month ago

That and the shrinking ability to grant access to device storage. If that becomes an option only on rooted phones (which seems like the directly Google is heading) it will make the audience for such an app much smaller.

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

If google heads that way I'll head somewhere else.

[-] bilb@lem.monster 8 points 1 month ago

To apple? Linux phone experience is just trash.

[-] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This is my currently dilemma.
Each year Android becomes more restrictive like iOS with none of the benefits, Rooting becomes harder as more apps tap into the Play Integrity API (and strong Integrity is on the way to kill most workarounds for it), iPhone got a little better but is still locked down as fuck, where the hell do I go to? 😒

[-] NostraDavid@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

LineageOS, maybe? Still Android, but (AFAIK) more open to change than standard Android.

[-] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

I've been using custom ROMs for a while now, but the reality is that they can only do so much to stop Android's ever increasing restrictions.
And the aforementioned Integrity API also detects unlocked bootloaders, meaning this will gradually become more of a problem.

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Realistically I have no where to go and that's the problem. iOS is even more locked down.

[-] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 month ago

No one says you have to upgrade your phone OS to the latest Android. You can just keep using the Android (and/or Custom ROM) that works.

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Sure, but what about security? Not that I haven't had to use outdated phones before.

[-] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 month ago

Security is not a state but a scale, and is gauged against everything else.

From the perspective of a privacy / security zealot, a smartphone is SOL as soon as they lave the factory, as not only not even OTA updates keep them safe (and you can argue that with some manufacturers such as Samsung, OTA does is the primary risk vector!) but they can eg.: ship with unfixable vulns at the hardware level that would lead to ditch the whole thing anyway.

So long as there isn't something like a state-funded program for citizens to renew their phones every ~2 years for fully open ones, I'd not worry much. After all, the other option would be not using a phone because current ones are a PITA and just as vulnerable from the other end.

[-] peregus@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

IMHO some update is better than no update at all!

[-] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 weeks ago

Oh yeah totally. But while one could argue we are owed security, we are not owed updates. (And when we do, they're offered to us via "buy another phone", such is Capitalism).

[-] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

And yet Resilio can access a lot more than ST, even without root.

[-] peregus@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

That and the shrinking ability to grant access to device storage.

Isn't that helping the average users with security in a way that a scam app can't see much else than itself?

[-] t_378@lemmy.one 26 points 1 month ago

The point you raise reminds me of when Signal dropped SMS support, after my efforts to convert all the non techie people in my life over to it. So sad when it happens...

[-] NostraDavid@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago

So sad when it happens…

I don't follow - do people still seriously use SMS? I for one try to use it as little as possible.

[-] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 month ago

I was reminded of the same thing.

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 month ago

As much as I want to use F-Droid, my work blocks all third party app stores so it's either have access to my work stuff on one phone (via profiles) or dual wield two phones.

I lack the patience to dual wield again. It's very annoying.

[-] Atemu@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Is this your personal phone? If your work were to dictate what you are allowed to install on your personal phone, that'd be a serious overstepping of bounds.

Perhaps you can sneak in f-droid via adb install and give it app installation permissions via ADB though.

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago

My primary phone belongs to my work. I get a stipend every two years that essentially allows me to buy any supported phone I want.

The conditions are that it's managed by them via MDM and all my work stuff is on the work profile side.

It is a choice I make since it allows me to not carry two phones. I did that for the first two years at my company and it was annoying.

[-] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 month ago

My primary phone belongs to my work.

So it's not yours. Looks from here that's the one issue you have to solve before everything else.

[-] bilb@lem.monster 4 points 1 month ago

If "your" phone belongs to your employer that's the choice you made. It isn't yours.

[-] derin@lemmy.beru.co 10 points 1 month ago

I'm annoyed to see you getting down voted - I had a similar issue years ago with my work MacBook (couldn't run a custom WM because any modification to the Finder was blocked without putting the machine into "unsafe" mode).

I love OSS, but without a verifiable way to distribute it large swaths of the workforce won't be able to use it.

F-Droid is great, but sadly it isn't enough.

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago

I was today years old when I learned that you can run a custom WM on a Mac.

That's like....the equivalent of a coca cola soda machine dispensing Pepsi.

And in terms of down votes, I don't really care too much. It evens out overtime.

[-] derin@lemmy.beru.co 1 points 1 month ago
[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

Thank you but I don't run a Mac. I used to back in the day. I just know how anal Apple is about people using their devices in any way that they don't specifically want you to.

They said somewhere that the play store thing is not the reason, it's just one of the more recent issues.

[-] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

They're a cloud company, their mission statement is to eradicate us. It's like IT trying to stamp out shadow IT.

this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
785 points (99.4% liked)

Selfhosted

40347 readers
286 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS