318
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
318 points (98.5% liked)
politics
19087 readers
4433 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
It was probably a franchise owner that did it and corporate didn't know till the rest of us.
Obviously fuck Sicky D's, but I bet corporate is more pissed off than anyone else.
They did know beforehand, an AP article said as much:
This gives me a great reason to never eat at McDonald’s again.
Open doors to anyone, by closing them for anyone not pre approved to show up when Trump was there.
That's a hail-mary reframe for "piss-colored".
Nearly had it, too.
"- we are golden, like the shower"
Fixed that for them.
To be fair, they can’t stop a franchisee from being a dip shit - even though it is causing serious damage to the brand.
They could’ve theoretically played it that way, but they didn’t. They said they got the request and approved it.
They can. They own the property as a requirement for franchising. If they don't want it to happen they can deny the request and remove for trespassing anyone who doesn't cooperate.
They could have made their "we're not political" announcement the day after it was announced, instead of after the event already happened.
It is a difficult position to be in.
So the crazy makes a plan with a local franchise owner. Tells corporate he has already said yes. Even though they likely don't want anything to do with it, as it is a no win situation for them, they are fucked either way.
They have the shit job of saying no one of the most petty people in the world; who may be the next president. He could tell his cult to avoid McD's because they snubbed him etc...so now it is either piss off the MAGA crowd, quite possibly their biggest market, or piss off the dems...
McD's is not great food, but it isn't terrible either. I don't envy the higher ups having to make this situation palatable.
Their statement is pretty good though.
This is basically saying even though he is a criminal, we would still give him a chance. That is a dem dog-whistle if ever I saw one.
Nope the corporate had to have been fully aware since there was a joke on SNL about his visit happening the next day. It was in the news that it was gonna happen and McDonald's did nothing to stop it.
I think you're confused.
Because I said they likely found out when everyone else did...
And you replied saying they found out...
When everyone else did?
Then there's the part where I'd still need to explain how franchising works
Hah! I love how palpable you made your exasperation!
McDonalds is a franchise, local owners are separate entities from the franchise "parent".
Plus, McDonalds is a huge company. They probably couldn't move their massive legal machinery to respond in time to stop it. Even if they could they would probably have had to know which franchisee was doing it ahead of time, and also have to find something in the franchise agreement specifically they were violating.
In b4 McD’s changes the franchising agreement to require all events with media present to be approved by McD’s corp prior to the event.
I would be surprised if they don’t already have this
If they had done something to stop it, they would have been sued by the franchise owner who did nothing to violate the franchise agreement.
Which is interesting, because usually corporate has all the power in franchise agreements.