300
submitted 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) by ptz@dubvee.org to c/politics@lemmy.world

Cross-posted from "Too Bad, So Sad, Too Late - McDonald’s tells U.S. restaurants it’s not a ‘political brand’ after Trump visit" by @JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee in !news@beehaw.org


Excerpt:

Though President Donald Trump visited a Pennsylvania McDonald’s location on Sunday, the fast-food giant is trying to stay neutral in the presidential race.

“As we’ve seen, our brand has been a fixture of conversation in this election cycle. While we’ve not sought this, it’s a testament to how much McDonald’s resonates with so many Americans. McDonald’s does not endorse candidates for elected office and that remains true in this race for the next President,” the company said in an internal message viewed by CNBC and confirmed by a source familiar with the matter.


I haven't eaten at a McDonalds since before covid, and I don't really miss it.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] aquinteros@lemmy.world 1 points 32 minutes ago

yeah I'm going to start non politically going to Carl's jr from now on

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 15 points 2 hours ago

You can't just say it. Where's the action?

Revoke that fucker's franchisee licenses to start. He'll paint the building red white and blue, rename it Magadonalds, and they'll all flock to it and get dysentery from the freedom meals until it closes down when it's revealed that he's been molesting kids at the Sunday school he "volunteered" at

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 39 points 5 hours ago

They can distance themselves all they want. The damage is done.

[-] auzy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

They're all franchises

I can't imagine there is anything in the contract they violated either.

But, that being said, I would certainly avoid that Macca's and the franchise owners ones

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I can't imagine there is anything in the contract they violated either.

That's part of the damage done. They can claim they're non-political, but they allow their franchisees to make corporate appear political, because they're basically the same thing to the average person because they don't know the difference.

[-] ianhclark510@lemmy.blahaj.zone 59 points 6 hours ago

You claim to not be a political company, but you gave a platform to a facist rapist ~3 weeks before his election

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 4 hours ago

It was a franchise that did it, and a shitty one at that.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 hours ago

They haven’t revoked the franchise license which means they support the action.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club -1 points 2 hours ago

Can they revoke a franchise that quickly?

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 hours ago

They can immediately make a public statement that they are trying to. The fact that they haven’t means they support the stunt, but want to pretend otherwise so that they don’t lose customers.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 30 points 6 hours ago

McDonald's trials a second clown in bizarre PR stunt, attempts to distance themselves immediately after.

McDonald's today attempts to disavow a PR stunt after backlash regarding a second clown character being added to the fandom. Reviewers described the addition as "depressingly old," "demented," and "a massive health code violation."

Other reviewers were appalled at the character's backstory. "This is supposed to be a family restaurant," said one online complaint, "they're adding a character who is rapist wearing orange clown makeup? I know we're close to Halloween but that is just completely unacceptable. I cannot bring my children here."

[-] MooseTheDog@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago

Finally a clown with more makeup than Ronald McDonald.

[-] BigPotato@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

Pretty much the same, can't really boycott something I've already been not consuming!

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 109 points 8 hours ago

If McDonald's isn't political, they should have that as part of the brand standards to which franchisees must adhere.

McDonalds' opposition to unions is political.

[-] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 67 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

“Upon learning of the former president’s request, we approached it through the lens of one of our core values: we open our doors to everyone,” the company said.

When you're door is open to fascist demagogues, it's not open to everyone.

[-] djsoren19@yiffit.net 4 points 3 hours ago

They don't care. Nazis have money too, and McDonalds doesn't discriminate.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 10 points 5 hours ago

we open our doors to everyone

So I can have my local McDonald's close for several hours while I get some vanity pictures of me standing in front of a fryer?

[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 13 points 5 hours ago

If a Nazi sits at a table with 9 others and no one objects, there are 10 Nazis sitting at that table.

[-] Saleh@feddit.org 7 points 5 hours ago

Allowing everyone behind the counter serving food to unknowing customers sounds like a massive health code violation.

[-] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Without a hair net or hand washing in Trumps case. Photo op is gonna get y'all sick and you'll deserve.

[-] chetradley@lemmy.world 17 points 6 hours ago

If your company platforms racists, it's a racist company.

[-] Deello@lemm.ee 8 points 6 hours ago

“... we open our doors to everyone,” the company said.

But also you must leave within 30 mins or it's loitering and you will be trespassed.

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

everywhere the orange rolls becomes a political circus. no exceptions

[-] Fluffy_Ruffs@lemmy.world 28 points 8 hours ago

I haven't eaten at McDogball's in years. Their food has always been trash and now it's overpriced trash. If this steers more people away from eating there for political reasons then all the better.

[-] TehWorld@lemmy.world 37 points 9 hours ago

It seems that most McDonald’s are removing EVERYTHING from their lobbies. No more free refills on drinks, no ketchup or salt, even napkins are behind the counter now. Makes for a considerably more annoying visit, especially as they’re woefully understaffed, so you have to wait for someone to be bothered to get a couple napkins and ketchup while your kid screams at you.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 29 points 9 hours ago

The point is to not have a lobby anymore.

The US has always been obsessed with the drive-thru (nothing says good eats quite like huffing car fumes) and covid pushed a shift toward people just buying fast food to take home and eat.

So discourage people from dining in until "The demand is low so we are being more green or some shit by getting rid of it".

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 4 hours ago

The original McDonald's didn't have a lobby. You were supposed to eat the food in your car.

It looks like McDonald's is trying to get back to its roots.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 8 hours ago

They've also been supporting the IDF for a while now. Fuck McDonalds.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 68 points 10 hours ago

It was probably a franchise owner that did it and corporate didn't know till the rest of us.

Obviously fuck Sicky D's, but I bet corporate is more pissed off than anyone else.

[-] kobra@lemm.ee 41 points 8 hours ago

They did know beforehand, an AP article said as much:

“Upon learning of the former president’s request, we approached it through the lens of one of our core values: we open our doors to everyone,” the company said. “McDonald’s does not endorse candidates for elected office and that remains true in this race for the next president. We are not red or blue – we are golden.”

[-] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 21 points 8 hours ago

This gives me a great reason to never eat at McDonald’s again.

[-] vodka@lemm.ee 6 points 7 hours ago

Open doors to anyone, by closing them for anyone not pre approved to show up when Trump was there.

[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago

That's a hail-mary reframe for "piss-colored".

Nearly had it, too.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago

They could have made their "we're not political" announcement the day after it was announced, instead of after the event already happened.

[-] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 1 points 4 hours ago

It is a difficult position to be in.

So the crazy makes a plan with a local franchise owner. Tells corporate he has already said yes. Even though they likely don't want anything to do with it, as it is a no win situation for them, they are fucked either way.

They have the shit job of saying no one of the most petty people in the world; who may be the next president. He could tell his cult to avoid McD's because they snubbed him etc...so now it is either piss off the MAGA crowd, quite possibly their biggest market, or piss off the dems...

McD's is not great food, but it isn't terrible either. I don't envy the higher ups having to make this situation palatable.

Their statement is pretty good though.

we open our doors to everyone

This is basically saying even though he is a criminal, we would still give him a chance. That is a dem dog-whistle if ever I saw one.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 45 points 10 hours ago

Too late! MAGADonalds is now as toxic as Chik-Fil-A (both politically and to your colon)

[-] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 8 hours ago

I still hate the chicken place more. On top of the other overtly political shit, I really dislike how they get their shitty restaurants into airports and thruways and other places with captive audiences and then still close on Sunday just for their virtue signalling bullshit. If they were actual Christians they would pay their employees more and open on Sundays to give food to the hungry. Hell even Ronald gives some money to orphans.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 34 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Oh look, a sack of shit serving shit food.

Fuck McDonald's.

[-] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 20 points 10 hours ago

A sack of shit serving sacks of shit

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
300 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19087 readers
4355 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS