687
SpyingOS (lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 week ago by GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 1 points 1 week ago

as an additional measure, sure. but these blocks are not hard to circumvent, so it's not enough in itself

[-] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 1 points 1 week ago

They’re not hard to circumvent, sure but then why am I so effectively blocking almost everything not tied to the “real” first-party domains?

[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 0 points 1 week ago

because they don't yet circumvent it. but also, are you completely sure everything is blocked? DoT, DoH traffic and such?

[-] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Well I MITM myself quite often to confirm it. I’m also smashing together hundreds of blocklists, and I always check the network tab of my browser’s developer tools and very rarely see anything coming from third-party domains.

Sure, sometimes assets are on the actual domain I’m visiting (or its CDN) but most of the time, even tracking scripts there are broken because they still call the blocked scripts.

By the way, it’s hilarious that everyone wants to fight so hard about this yet when someone says “use an adblocker” nobody says anything as if it’s the end-all solution.

I didn’t say “I have a bulletproof, surefire way to fix this.” I said “use network-based blocking.” However effective that is is up to the person implementing it; you have no idea how effective my setup is because you don’t have access to its configuration.

this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
687 points (95.9% liked)

Memes

45727 readers
853 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS