96
AMD lays off 4% of its workforce
(techcrunch.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
96 points (98.0% liked)
PC Gaming
8784 readers
333 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
If you want to work in AI, they're hiring. The layoff was sold as a way to make room for more AI headcount.
as someone who works at AMD and on AI, this is only kinda true. While we're not as affected by layoffs, AMD has been extremely stingy with budget this year. Maybe that will change in the coming months though
As someone who works at AMD not in AI, that's how they explained it to us. Or I guess it was a bit more generic "highest growth areas" and "still hiring for positions aligned with our strategic priorities." Which we generally took to mean AI based on the gestures broadly at the market.
hmmmm, seems like everyone's getting fucked regardless then. I'm working on next gen MI stuff and it's pretty hard to even get a req right now. Management hasn't mentioned the whole "strategic priorities" thing to us, probably because if we're not a priority, then who is? AMD didn't really do a lot of firing before now, at least not that I'm aware of, so maybe this is how they're explaining it
Yeah. I'm surprised they took from MI. Management was just complaining last week about how hard it is to hire RTL people and trying to juggle us around to all the generations and variants that need to be staffed. And then this week it's this. Maybe it is how they fire people; I haven't heard of anyone else being fired besides this layoff in the ~4 years I've been there.