320
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 8 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

What if we constantly subsidized industries that made our climate unlivable?

Nuclear is a sound option. We already deal with mining wastes that must be managed in perpetuity. Nuclear waste isn't much different in that regard.

Your point about landscapes also happens in mining.

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz -4 points 6 hours ago

Yes, we should be moving to solar instead of propping up uneconomic polluting industries like nuclear or coal.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago

Doing something because it's the "most economical" is why we have a climate catastrophe on our hands. Plus solar can't actually provide steady power on it's own and never will be able to. Exotic nation wide energy storage solutions do not exists at our current level of technology. Instead solar/wind has to be offset by natural gas power plants.

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 hours ago

I fully support solar and wind but I don't think it's a one size fits all at this point. I think solar needs to get a lot more efficient and better to cover all the applications that oil and gas and coal do.

Even renewables need mining (sadly) which has significant impacts.

this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
320 points (93.7% liked)

> Greentext

7541 readers
471 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS