89
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml

“Bluesky is called a decentralized network and uses the term federation. The problem is that their technology, from the point of view of power dynamics, is not decentralized at all,” emphasizes Christine Lemmer-Webber, an expert on decentralized social protocols. “The use of some decentralisation techniques, but the decentralized service itself is not today. There is one big company that controls the flow of information, and without which this network cannot operate at the moment.”

This does not mean that moving from X/Twitter to Bluesky is a bad idea. “I appreciate that Bluesky wants to build a service that can quickly fully replace Twitter. But I don’t think they should claim that this service is decentralized and instead focus on the date of a “trustworthy way”.

Source: https://oko.press/ucieczka-z-twittera-przyszlosc-mediow-spolecznosciowych

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 day ago

Guys I'm starting to think these corporations are just in it for the money, and that the money is fundamentally at odds with the user experience.

[-] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 4 points 15 hours ago

What?! Noooooooooo... Name one time that's happened!

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 4 points 23 hours ago

Now can you convince the masses?

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 5 points 22 hours ago

until there's a star trek like cultural and social sea change; only money can convince the masses

this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
89 points (97.8% liked)

Fediverse

17729 readers
113 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS