987
Anon questions our energy sector (slrpnk.net)
submitted 1 week ago by MataVatnik@lemmy.world to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
389 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] reksas@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

there are millions being poured into propaganda against using anything but fossil fuels, much of it stems from there. But i wonder if its better this way or the alternative way where we would use more nuclear energy but since there would be so much money to be made, the rich would use their money to make all safety regulations null. I wish we could just get rid of the source problem.

[-] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 6 points 6 days ago

Europe's regulations are strict and robust. However, the German Greens convinced lots of people that they aren't enough.

[-] reksas@sopuli.xyz -2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

is that party in the pockets of oil companies?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
987 points (86.4% liked)

Science Memes

11161 readers
1505 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Sal@mander.xyz
fossilesque@mander.xyz
SciBot@mander.xyz