481
Anon's uncle is sick
(sh.itjust.works)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
481 points (96.3% liked)
Greentext
4452 readers
986 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
It's more than that... I know you were joking but ...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estimates_of_historical_world_population
Yeah it's estimated but it's a shit ton of people so it's more like 99.9%
Hang on there based on the image, 7.95 billion alive today, 109 billion have lived and died, that's like 93% death rate not 99.9%. Is there some other figure on the page you're basing the 99.9% off?
You underestimate the effects of population growth. There was a lot of time in prehistory but the population at any given point was tiny compared to today.
i remember an old article that said DNA shows that all current humans can be traced back to 7 women during the ice age.
There were probably more around at the time, all the other bloodlines just died off.
And they were all neighbours in the same age and shared a WhatsApp group.
Those people were alive and died it doesn't matter... There have been more people dead than are currently living by a lot.
We don't care how many people were alive back than compared to today. It's the total amount to how many have died...
But that is exactly the ratio you claim to be 99.9% when in reality it is closer to 93%.
No your right, my bad I'm terrible at math and sick