275
submitted 17 hours ago by geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml

Bernie Sanders caused a stir last week, when the independent senator from Vermont and two-time contender for the Democratic presidential nomination sent a post-election email to his progressive supporters across the country. In it, he argued that the Democrats suffered politically in 2024 at least in part because they ran a campaign that focused on “protecting the status quo and tinkering around the edges.”

In contrast, said Sanders, “Trump and the Republicans campaigned on change and on smashing the existing order.” Yes, he explained, “the ‘change’ that Republicans will bring about will make a bad situation worse, and a society of gross inequality even more unequal, more unjust and more bigoted.”

Despite that the reality of the threat they posed, Trump and the Republicans still won a narrow popular-vote victory for the presidency, along with control of the US House. That result has inspired an intense debate over the future direction not just of the Democratic Party but of the country. And the senator from Vermont is in the thick of it.

In his email, Sanders, a member of the Senate Democratic Caucus who campaigned in states across the country this fall for Vice President Kamala Harris and the Democratic ticket, asked a blunt question: “Will the Democratic leadership learn the lessons of their defeat and create a party that stands with the working class and is prepared to take on the enormously powerful special interests that dominate our economy, our media and our political life?”

His answer: “Highly unlikely. They are much too wedded to the billionaires and corporate interests that fund their campaigns.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 19 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Dont forget to add Aipac to this lists. I have no idea how they aren’t scrutinized more commonly. I am sure they played a big part this election.

Imagine if there was a pro chinese organization being politically active in the US openly lobbying and funding both US parties for chinese interests.

Its bad on a silver plater.

[-] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago

Because it's anti-semetic if you stop them from bribing, blackmailing, and spying on our politicians.

this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
275 points (97.9% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7233 readers
564 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS