106
69

A 2024 article talks about their strategy: they believe in a radical 'rebirth' of the U.S. through a major financial crisis—one that would force a debt default, eliminate the Federal Reserve, and replace the system with a libertarian model centered on cryptocurrency.

These ideas may have sounded like conspiracy theories in the past, but in 2025, they seem more plausible. The current administration thrives on chaos as a distraction, yet its policies increasingly align with this vision of engineered collapse. Is this what’s actually happening?

[-] Lugh@futurology.today 2 points 1 day ago

The amount of precise manipulation needed to do something as simple as repair the feeder mechanism on a welder,

If robots can build cars, I'd guess they can manage that.

297
[-] Lugh@futurology.today 5 points 1 day ago

They day will come when robots can do all the maintenance they need on each other.

60

Bringing manufacturing jobs home has been in the news lately, but it's not the 1950s or even the 1980s anymore. Today's factories need far less humans. Global car sales were 78,000,000 in 2024 and the global automotive workforce was 2,500,000. However, if the global workforce was as efficient as this Honda factory, it could build those cars with only 20% of that workforce.

If something can be done for 20% of the cost, that is probably the direction of travel. Bear in mind too, factories will get even more automated and efficient than today's 2025 Honda factory.

It's not improbable within a few years we will have 100% robot-staffed factories that need no humans at all. Who'll have the money to buy all the cars they make is another question entirely.

Details of the new Honda factory.

2
[-] Lugh@futurology.today 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA) makes Big Tech (like Meta, Google) reveal how they track users, moderate content, and handle disinformation. Most of these companies hate the law and are lobbying against it in Brussels—but except for Twitter (now X), they’re at least trying to follow it for EU users.

Meanwhile, US politics may push Big Tech to resist these rules more aggressively, especially since they have strong influence over the current US government.

AI will be the next big tech divide: The US will likely have little regulation, while the EU will take a much stronger approach to regulating. Growing tensions—over trade, military threats, and tech policies—are driving the US and EU apart, and this split will continue for at least four more years.

192
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by Lugh@futurology.today to c/futurology@futurology.today
9
8
18
[-] Lugh@futurology.today 5 points 4 days ago

The Russian propaganda seems much more effective with the right-wing people. Is that an AI thing, or are they more susceptible for other reasons?

[-] Lugh@futurology.today 4 points 4 days ago

I'm sick of hearing Musk's plans for it, those will never pan out. But humans are probably destined to leave Earth and spread out someday - that I still think will happen, and is worth considering.

94
[-] Lugh@futurology.today 3 points 4 days ago

I was wondering would they have over-heating problems, but the energy is so small it can probably be dissipated elsewhere.

[-] Lugh@futurology.today 7 points 4 days ago

As places are limited, they need to focus on those with talent and ability.

[-] Lugh@futurology.today 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

If you google Hitler's paintings you can see why he was rejected. They're flat, rigid and lacking in creativity - perhaps not surprising for a fascist megalomaniac. I'm curious to see what the AI will learn here. Lots of ai-generated imagery is technically good, but can it really be said to have creativity?

31
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by Lugh@futurology.today to c/futurology@futurology.today
[-] Lugh@futurology.today 4 points 4 days ago

As radioactive decay can't be stopped, I'm assuming this emits power continuously. Whatever this is used for won't have any On/Off buttons.

[-] Lugh@futurology.today 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

This exponential rate of progress has been observed many times with different types of AI, here's a recent example of it.

[-] Lugh@futurology.today 1 points 4 days ago

My reasoning is based on the fact they are selling similar to these in the $20k price range. Buying them means they cost a fraction of employing a minimum wage worker in western countries.

They are embodied AI, so improving at the rate AI is. That is exponentially. Meaning iterations of these may be 32, 64, 128, etc times more powerful in the 2030s, and even cheaper.

I think it is very reasonable to say they will be common in the 2030s.

90
[-] Lugh@futurology.today 17 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

With upcoming space telescopes in the 2030s, there should be a few capable of analyzing exoplanet atmospheres. Exciting to think we may be soon able to deduce the presence of carbon-based life in another planetary system.

view more: next ›

Lugh

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF