0
submitted 1 month ago by glans@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

Not gonna do a debunk, but just wanna say that some of the "neutral facts" in this here article aren't really accurate. This isn't a good place to learn science, even lib science. It's a political article. But also the politics suck. It's a news article. But also the "news" here is mostly from 1983ish.

Anyway it sucks. RKA sucks.

spoiler

FDA reportedly raids manufacturer of poppers, an increasingly popular party drug

A manufacturer of the drug announced it has “stopped all operations following a search and seizure at our offices by the FDA.”

Amyl nitrite is commonly known as "poppers."Iain Buist / Mirrorpix via Getty Images file

March 14, 2025, 11:50 PM GMT

By Benjamin Ryan

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has reportedly targeted a manufacturer of poppers, an inhalant drug that has gained increasingly mainstream popularity as an adjunct to clubbing and sexual activity. The drug has long been sold in convenience stores under a legal loophole. 

Double Scorpio, an Austin-based poppers manufacturer, issued a statement on its website Thursday stating that the company had “stopped all operations following a search and seizure at our offices by the FDA.” 

The reported raid comes after Robert F. Kennedy Jr. took the helm of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees the FDA. Kennedy, an environmental lawyer with a history of drug addiction and false claims about vaccines in particular, has erroneously suggested that poppers and other drug use, not HIV, cause AIDS. However, what led to the reported raid or whether Kennedy had any knowledge of it is unclear.

The news about the FDA search and seizure was first released by Fast Company, which reported based on anonymous sources that a broader crackdown was underway.

When asked about whether the FDA is cracking down on any manufacturers of poppers, Amanda M. Hils, an FDA spokesperson, said the agency, as a matter of policy, “does not comment on possible criminal investigations.” 

HHS did not respond immediately to a request for comment. Nor did Double Scorpio. 

A representative of another company, The Popper King — which is based in Buffalo, New York, and brands its website as the “premiere site to buy poppers online” — said the business had not been contacted by the FDA. The representative said she could not discuss the matter further; she declined to reveal her name and did not provide a reason. 

Alkyl nitrates, or poppers, which are meant to be inhaled, cause an immediate and short-lasting euphoric rush along with muscle relaxation. The drug has long been popular among gay men, in part because it can relax the sphincter muscle and make anal sex less painful and otherwise more pleasurable. 

Side effects include headache, rapid heart rate, visual disturbances, dizziness and flushing in the face. Poppers can also cause an abnormal amount of hemoglobin to collect in the blood, low red blood cells, damage to the eyes and skin inflammation and irritation.  

The FDA issued an advisory in 2021 warning consumers not to purchase or use poppers, stating that “these products can result in serious adverse health effects, including death, when ingested or inhaled.” The advisory stated: “The FDA has observed an increase in reports of deaths and hospitalizations with issues such as severe headaches, dizziness, increase in body temperature, difficulty breathing, extreme drops in blood pressure, blood oxygen issues (methemoglobinemia) and brain death after ingestion or inhalation of nitrite ‘poppers.’”

According to Adam Zmith, the author of “Deep Sniff: a History of Poppers and Queer Futures,” amyl nitrate, a close cousin to the chemical most widely used as poppers today, was first identified by a French chemist in 1844. By the late 19th century, doctors used it to ease chest pain, because it affects blood flow to the heart. The drug, Zmith said, became popular with gay men in New York and San Francisco beginning in the 1950s and 1960s, when it was available without a prescription from pharmacists. 

Though Congress has tried to regulate and ban some iterations of poppers, they have long persisted in a legal gray area. According to a report in the August issue of California Legal Review, it is illegal to sell poppers for recreational use under U.S. law. As a result, the report notes, some manufacturers have gotten around this by marketing these chemicals for commercial purposes, such as air fresheners, leather cleaners and nail polisher removers. Poppers can now be found in smoke shops and convenience stories with brand names such as Rush, Jungle Juice and Locker Room.

Poppers, AIDS and RFK Jr. 

After the first signs of the AIDS epidemic were identified among gay men in 1981, scientists initially investigated whether the use of party drugs, including poppers, was causing the catastrophic collapse of the immune system in a rapidly increasing number of gay men. But after HIV was identified as the cause of AIDS in 1983, it became clear that poppers, though they cause disinhibition and are correlated with sexual behaviors that drive HIV transmission, were not the central culprit. 

Nevertheless, Kennedy has lent credence to the unsupported theory that poppers caused AIDS. He asserted in an undated speech, unearthed in 2023, that during the early 1980s, Dr. Anthony Fauci, who became the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in 1984, essentially won a scientific “power struggle” to claim AIDS was caused by an infectious disease and that this, Kennedy said, “allowed him to take control of it.” Instead, Kennedy falsely argued, HIV was a mere “passenger virus” and suggested that it was the “gay lifestyle” of poppers use and heavy partying that was driving an “autoimmunity” among them.

There is no proven causal link between poppers and AIDS. HIV is a retrovirus that is primarily sexually transmitted and infects immune cells. Left untreated, it destroys the immune system over time, leaving the body vulnerable to infections, and is nearly universally fatal. 

Poppers: convenient to obtain, easy to misuse

According to a 2020 study, 3.3% of American adults surveyed from 2015 to 2017 reported ever using poppers, including 35% of gay men. Recent reports suggest that poppers have recently made inroads among heterosexuals as well. 

Joseph J. Palamar, an associate professor in population health at NYU Langone Health, studies poppers use. He shared statistics with NBC News, not yet peer-reviewed, that his team has been collecting in recent years by surveying attendees of New York City nightclubs. Of the more than 1,400 club attendees surveyed in 2024, 18% reported using poppers during the past year, including 46% of gay and bisexual men, 28% of lesbian and bisexual women, 10% of heterosexual women and 6% of heterosexual men.

While he said he could not give precise poisoning and death figures because they were pending publication, Palamar said that nationwide, reports to poison control centers about poppers causing serious adverse health events have been increasing and that there have been a few associated deaths in recent years. He speculated that the most severe poisonings might be related to people drinking poppers. 

Palamar said that the fact that poppers are often sold in convenience stores next to energy drinks, and are packaged such that they resemble energy-drink shots themselves, may mislead people who are new to the drug to falsely believe they are meant to be drunk.

Ignorance about the drugs among store employees may be driving especially dangerous use of poppers, new research has suggested.

For a study published in Clinical Toxicology on Wednesday, researchers visited 98 smoke shops, weed dispensaries and sex shops within the jurisdiction of a New York City poison center that had noted an increase in reports of poppers poisoning. They asked employees at the 86 stores that sold the drug for instructions on using it. Nearly half advised inhaling it, while 44% were unsure and 8% advised ingesting the fluid. 

“I’m not saying to use them,” Palamar, who was not involved in this new study, said of poppers. “But if you do use them, do not drink them. It’s not an energy drink. You’ll definitely be poisoned.”


39

I was going to make a cohesive post but I don't have the juice.

I think of this image every single day since I saw it a year ago.

  1. Here you can see a weapon that IDF forces discovered hidden inside incubators at the hospital.

You might have to open full size to see what's going on.

This is what these motherfuckers brought to their own defense against the Crime of Genocide. So sad to think about the NICU nurses needing a gun to defend themselves but why the fuck wouldn't you. There should be lots more guns around, hopefully once defeat was inevitable they got the guns somewhere more useful. It's a hospital in a war zone. Ever watch MASH? Guns everywhere

It is so depraved to show this tragic pictures in which they are the aggressor in so many ways: over time space, across various planes of logic.

To show that TINY little gun as a justification of why they weren't doing genocide because some people really just need to be genocide.

I know there are thousands of worse things i just think about this thing every day, because it's so twisted.

14
submitted 3 months ago by glans@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

“Unfortunately everything you suspect about RIAC management is true,” Perkins wrote in the message, claiming management wanted to get rid of the police department and “most of all the union.”

full text

T.F. Green head of security resigns abruptly

by: Tim White

Posted: Jan 28, 2025 / 04:11 PM EST

WARWICK, R.I. (WPRI) – R.I. Airport Corp. head of security Joseph Perkins abruptly resigned Tuesday after sending an alarming message to colleagues, accusing airport management of seeking “to eliminate the police department.”

Perkins outlined the allegations against airport management in a message he sent to members of the airport police department before handing in his resignation to State Police Col. Darnell Weaver, who oversees law enforcement at Rhode Island T.F. Green International Airport.

“Unfortunately everything you suspect about RIAC management is true,” Perkins wrote in the message, claiming management wanted to get rid of the police department and “most of all the union.”

Airport spokesperson Bill Fischer denied the allegations, downplaying Perkins’ authority at the airport and noting he’d only joined in September. He also said the airport never received a letter of resignation from Perkins and that he’d never raised his concerns to airport leadership.

“There are no plans to eliminate the RIAC police department and the airport is properly staffed and able to fulfill its mission,” Fischer said. “We have had the same staffing levels over the last decade. The department has been and will continue to be led by senior vice president of operations, Duc Nguyen.”

Lt. Col. Robert Creamer said Perkins does not report to the Department of Public Safety and directed all questions to the airport corporation.

In an email to Target 12, Perkins confirmed his resignation and said he immediately notified the airport police department about his decision, “encouraging them to stay strong and committed to their duty of serving and protecting the airport and the citizens who utilize it.”

“To the astonishment of most people I speak with outside the airport, the leadership must be changed,” Perkins wrote. “I am sorry I was not able to make that change happen. I am sorry I was not able to become what I and most of you expected when I took this job.”

He advised the staff to “fight” and “do not let them win.”

Perkins confirmed the authenticity of the internal message via text message.

Perkins came to RIAC with 35 years of law enforcement experience, most recently serving 10 years as chief of the Middleboro Police Department in Massachusetts.

His departure comes at a time of internal turbulence at the quasi-government agency, which oversees Rhode Island airports. In October, RIAC President and CEO Iftikhar Ahmad announced he was launching an internal investigation after a series of anonymous emails and letters circulated criticizing his leadership.

ALSO READ: TF Green fire lieutenant fired over alleged misconduct, excess overtime

The administration has denied the allegations in the anonymous letters and has raised the possibility of filing a lawsuit against the author if they are revealed.

More than 160 employees at the airport — including its police officers — are currently negotiating a new contract with RIAC leadership. Council 94, the union that represents the workers, has repeatedly raised concerns about Ahmed’s leadership.

“We have been raising an alarm about RIAC’s ill treatment of both union and nonunion employees,” said Jim Cenerini of Council 94. “This is our minds shows a continued pattern of disregard for their employees.”

Despite the tensions, passenger numbers have grown at T.F. Green. A news release by the agency touted the airport as the “fastest-growing hub airport in New England.” The release said the airport saw 27% increase in passengers from 2023 to 2024, passing 4 million travelers.

Tim White (twhite@wpri.com) is Target 12 managing editor and chief investigative reporter and host of Newsmakers for 12 News. Connect with him on Twitter and Facebook.


[-] glans@hexbear.net 57 points 3 months ago

cops also recently killed the commet pizza shooter

[-] glans@hexbear.net 113 points 3 months ago

having trouble formulating this thought but

the available information points to the death being femicide / intimate partner violence / abuse

like sometimes we have "critical support" for "comrade cancer" etc. but it's hard to get behind what is decribed as a fucking woman beating death as some sort of class victory.

45
submitted 3 months ago by glans@hexbear.net to c/technology@hexbear.net

Wow I can't hardly believe anybody passed a law like this in the USA.

I guess media outlets are acting like legal clinics now???

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/30666017

Optimum wasn’t ready to comply with law, rejected low-income man’s request twice.

full textWhen New York's law requiring $15 or $20 broadband plans for people with low incomes took effect last week, Optimum customer William O'Brien tried to sign up for the cheap Internet service. Since O'Brien is in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), he qualifies for one of the affordable plans that Internet service providers must offer New Yorkers who meet income eligibility requirements.

O'Brien has been paying Optimum $111.20 a month for broadband—$89.99 for the broadband service, $14 in equipment rental fees, a $6 "Network Enhancement Fee," and $1.21 in tax. He was due for a big discount under the New York Affordable Broadband Act (ABA), which says that any ISP with over 20,000 customers must offer either a $15 plan with download speeds of at least 25Mbps or a $20 plan with at least 200Mbps speeds, and that the price must include "any recurring taxes and fees such as recurring rental fees for service provider equipment required to obtain broadband service and usage fees."

Despite qualifying for a low-income plan under the law's criteria, O'Brien's request was denied by Optimum. He reached out to Ars, just like many other people who have read our articles about bad telecom customer service. Usually, these problems are fixed quickly after we reach out to an Internet provider's public relations department on the customer's behalf.

That seemed to be the way it was going, as Optimum's PR team admitted the mistake and told us that a customer relations specialist would reach out to O'Brien and get him on the right plan. But O'Brien was rejected again after that.

We followed up with Optimum's PR team, and they had to intervene a second time to make sure the company gave O'Brien what he's entitled to under the law. The company also updated its marketing materials after we pointed out that its Optimum Advantage Internet webpage still said the low-income plan wasn't available to current customers, former users who disconnected less than 60 days ago, and former customers whose accounts were "not in good standing." The New York law doesn't allow for those kinds of exceptions.

O'Brien is now on a $14.99 plan with 50Mbps download and 5Mbps upload speeds. He was previously on a 100Mbps download plan and had faster upload speeds, but from now on he'll be paying nearly $100 less a month.

Obviously, telecom customers shouldn't ever have to contact a news organization just to get a basic problem solved. But the specter of media coverage usually causes an ISP to take quick action, so it was surprising when O'Brien was rejected a second time. Here's what happened.

“We don’t have that plan”

O'Brien contacted Optimum (which used to be called Cablevision and is now owned by Altice USA) after learning about the New York law from an Ars article. "I immediately got on Optimum's website to chat with live support but they refused to comply with the act," O'Brien told us on January 15, the day the law took effect.

A transcript of O'Brien's January 15 chat with Optimum shows that the customer service agent told him, "I did check on that and according to the policy we don't have that credit offer in Optimum right now." O'Brien provided the agent a link to the Ars article, which described the New York law and mentioned that Optimum offers a low-income plan for $15.

"After careful review, I did check on that, it is not officially from Optimum and in Optimum we don't have that plan," the agent replied.

O'Brien provided Ars with documents showing that he is in SNAP and thus qualifies for the low-income plan. We provided this information to the Optimum PR department on the morning of January 17.

"We have escalated this exchange with our teams internally to ensure this issue is rectified and will be reaching out to the customer directly today to assist in getting him on the right plan," an Optimum spokesperson told us that afternoon.

A specialist from Optimum's executive customer relations squad reached out to O'Brien later on Friday. He missed the call, but they connected on Tuesday, January 21. She told O'Brien that Optimum doesn't offer the low-income plan to existing customers.

"She said their position is that they offer the required service but only for new customers and since I already have service I'm disqualified," O'Brien told us. "I told her that I'm currently on food stamps and that I used to receive the $30 a month COVID credit but this did not matter. She claimed that since Optimum offers a $15, 50Mbps service... that they are in compliance with the law."

Shortly after the call, the specialist sent O'Brien an email reiterating that he wasn't eligible, which he shared with Ars. "As discussed prior to this notification, Optimum offers a low-income service for $15.00. However, we were unable to change the account to that service because it is an active account with the service," she wrote.

Second try

We contacted Optimum's PR team again after getting this update from O'Brien. On Tuesday evening, the specialist from executive customer relations emailed O'Brien to say, "The matter was reviewed, and I was advised that I could upgrade the account."

After another conversation with the specialist on Wednesday, O'Brien had the $15 plan. O'Brien told us that he "asked why I had to fight tooth and nail for this" and why he had to contact a news organization to get it resolved. "I claimed that it's almost like no one there has read the legislation, and it was complete silence," he told us.

On Wednesday this week, the Optimum spokesperson told us that "it seems that there has been some confusion among our care teams on the implementation of the ABA over the last week and how it should be correctly applied to our existing low-cost offers."

Optimum has offered its low-cost plan for several years, with the previously mentioned restrictions that limit it to new customers. The plan website wasn't updated in time for the New York law, but now says that "new and existing residential Internet customers in New York" qualify. The new-customer restriction still applies elsewhere.

"Our materials have been updated, including all internal documents and trainings, in addition to our external website," Optimum told us on Wednesday this week.

Law was in the works for years

Broadband lobby groups convinced a federal judge to block the New York affordability law in 2021, but a US appeals court reversed the ruling in April 2024. The Supreme Court decided not to hear the case in mid-December, allowing the law to take effect.

New York had agreed to delay enforcement until 30 days after the case's final resolution, which meant that it took effect on January 15. The state issued an order on January 9 reminding ISPs that they had to comply.

"We have been working as fast as we can to update all of our internal and external materials since the ABA was implemented only last week—there was quite a fast turnaround between state officials notifying us of the intended implementation date and pushing this live," Optimum told Ars.

AT&T decided to completely stop offering its 5G home Internet service in New York instead of complying with the state law. The law doesn't affect smartphone service, and AT&T doesn't offer wired home Internet in New York.

Optimum told us it plans to market its low-income plan "more broadly and conduct additional outreach in low-income areas to educate customers and prospects of this offer. We want to make sure that those eligible for this plan know about it and sign up."

O'Brien was disappointed that he couldn't get a faster service plan. As noted earlier, the New York law lets ISPs comply with either a $15 plan with download speeds of at least 25Mbps or a $20 plan with at least 200Mbps speeds. ISPs don't have to offer both.

"I did ask about 200Mbps service, but they said they are not offering that," he said. Optimum offers a $25 plan with 100Mbps speeds for low-income users. But even in New York, that one still isn't available to customers who were already subscribed to any other plan.

Failure to comply with the New York law can be punished with civil penalties of up to $1,000 per violation. The state attorney general can sue Internet providers to enforce the law. O'Brien said he intended to file a complaint against Optimum with the AG and is still hoping to get a 200Mbps plan.

We contacted Attorney General Letitia James' office on Wednesday to ask about plans for enforcing the law and whether the office has received any complaints so far, but we haven't gotten a response.


108
When Luigi Mangione Came to Our Prison (prisonjournalismproject.org)
submitted 3 months ago by glans@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

full text

When Luigi Mangione Came to Our Prison

A dispatch from SCI Huntingdon in Pennsylvania, which was briefly part of the biggest crime story in the nation.

by Vaughn Wright January 23, 2025

This story is a Kite, a special category dedicated to first-person reports that rely heavily on a writer’s first-hand observations and experiences. Read more about why PJP uses this category here__.

Well before Luigi Mangione became a temporary resident here at State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon, Pennsylvania, he and the crime he is alleged to have committed were topics of speculation among the prison population.

Through the prison grapevine, I learned that Mangione was being held in D-Rear, or the rear of D Block, a part of the prison where death row prisoners used to be housed.

Rather than the orange jumpsuit that is standard issue in here, he was wearing a “turtle suit,” a blue padded getup used primarily for prisoners vulnerable to committing self-harm. 

Every time he was escorted from his cell, D Block got locked down. During lockdowns, all prisoner movement is prohibited.

Within 48 hours of Mangione’s arrival here, cable and broadcast news had set up shop outside the prison. That evening, Ashleigh Banfield, the host of NewsNation’s “Banfield” show, placed a curious kind of spotlight on this prison. 

During that nighttime interview, Banfield realized the prisoners on E Block were watching her show when they shouted and blinked their ceiling lights in response to the conversation she was having from the studio with Alex Caprariello, her reporting colleague in the field. So she started posing questions directly to the prisoners, who responded both vocally out of their windows and visually with their cell lights.

I haven’t heard voices here raised in such raucous unison since 2018, when the Philadelphia Eagles won the 2017 Super Bowl. Though it was hard for Caprariello to hear anyone shouting from C Block, where I live, I suppose people relished the moment to have a voice. 

The day after the NewsNation “interview” with E Block aired, the prison’s deputy superintendent threatened everyone in the unit, particularly the guys on the street-facing side, with time in the hole if they yelled from their cell or blinked their lights for the media again.

You’ll notice in subsequent NewsNation interviews outside E Block that guys were still vocal, just not so much with the lights, to avoid being traced back to a particular cell. The deputy superintendent’s threat was all the act-right motivation they needed. Freedom of speech suppressed? Check.

Mangione’s notoriety likely softened the amount of oppression the guards here would usually dispense because they wanted something from him. They wanted stories to share with coworkers and friends and family. Everyone wanted a piece of the biggest crime story in the nation.

Now, nearly 2,000 of us are part of that story. No matter what, Mangione is and will forever be an SCI Huntingdon alumnus. His brothers here will intently follow his case as it moves forward through the criminal justice system, all the while telling anyone who’ll listen, if it had been them, what they would have done to keep from getting arrested in the first place.


59
submitted 3 months ago by glans@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

link to original document: chcoc.gov/sites/default/files/OPM Memo Initial Guidance Regarding DEIA Executive Orders.pdf

full text (somewhat awkwardly transformed into markdown)

MEMORANDUM

TO: Heads and Acting Heads of Departments and Agencies

FROM: Charles Ezell, Acting Director, U.S. Office of Personnel Management

DATE: January 21, 2025

RE: Initial Guidance Regarding DEIA Executive Orders


Pursuant to its authority under 5 U.S.C. § 1103(a)(1) and (a)(5), the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”) is providing the following initial guidance to agencies regarding the President’s executive orders titled Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing and Initial Rescissions of Harmful Executive Orders and Actions, which repeals Executive Order 14035, Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Accessibility in the Federal Workforce.

Steps to Close Agency DEIA Offices: In light of the above Executive Orders, each should take prompt actions regarding the offices and agency sub-units focusing exclusively on DEIA initiatives and programs (the “DEIA offices”). Specifically, agency heads should take the following steps:

  1. No later than 5:00 pm EST on Wednesday, January 22, 2025

a. Send an agency-wide notice to employees informing them of the closure and asking employees if they know of any efforts to disguise these programs by using coded or imprecise language a template agency-wide notice is attached as Appendix 1.

b. Send a notification to all employees of DEIA offices that they are being placed on paid administrative leave effective immediately as the agency takes steps to close/end all DEIA initiatives, offices and programs.^1^ A template employee letter is attached as Appendix 2.

[footnote] 1: The authority for placing these employees on paid administrative leave is set forth in the OPM memorandum entitled “Guidance on Probationary Periods, Administrative Leave and Details” issued January 20, 2025.

c. Take down all outward facing media (websites, social media accounts, etc.) of DEIA offices.

d. Withdraw any final or pending documents, directives, orders, materials, and equity plans issued by the agency in response to now-repealed Executive Order 14035, Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Accessibility (DEIA) in the Federal Workforce (June 25, 2021).

e. Cancel any DEIA-related trainings, and terminate any DEIA-related contractors.

  1. No later than 12:00 pm EST on Thursday, January 23, 2025, report to OPM on all steps taken to implement this memorandum, including:

a. a complete list of DEIA offices and any employees who in those offices as of November 5, 2024,

b. a complete list of all DEIA-related agency contracts as of November 5, 2024, and

c. any agency plans to fully comply with the above Executive Orders and this memorandum.

  1. No later than 5:00 pm EST on Friday, January 31, 2025, submit to OPM:

a. a written plan for executing a reduction-in-force action regarding the employees who work in a DEIA office. Agencies should coordinate with OPM in preparing these plans,

b. a list of all contract descriptions or personnel position descriptions that were changed since November 5, 2024 to obscure their connection to DEIA programs.

Please contact Amanda Scales at amanda.scales@opm.gov if you have any questions regarding this memorandum. Please send any reports requested by this guidance memo to DEIAreports@opm.gov, with a copy to amanda.scales@opm.gov.

cc: Chief Human Capital Officers (CHCOs), Deputy CHCOs, Human Resources Directors, and Chiefs of Staff

Appendix 1

Template Email - Agency Head to Employees

Dear agency employees,

We are taking steps to close all agency DEIA offices and end all DEIA-related contracts in accordance with President Trump’s executive orders titled Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing and Initial Rescissions of Harmful Executive Orders and Actions.

These programs divided Americans by race, wasted taxpayer dollars, and resulted in shameful discrimination.

We are aware of efforts by some in government to disguise these programs by using coded or imprecise language. If you are aware of a change in any contract description or personnel position description since November 5, 2024 to obscure the connection between the contract and DEIA or similar ideologies, please report all facts and circumstances to DEIAtruth@opm.gov within 10 days.

There will be no adverse consequences for timely reporting this information. However, failure to report this information within 10 days may result in adverse consequences.

Thank you for your attention to this important matter.

Appendix 2

Template Email - Administrative Leave Notice (Sent to Employees)

Dear [Employee],

This email provides important information regarding your employment status. Effective January 2[_], 2025 at [__] [_]m EST, all employees within [ODEIA] will be placed on administrative leave with full pay and benefits. This administrative leave is not being done for any disciplinary purpose.

Please note the following:

  • Pay and Benefits: You will continue to receive your full salary and benefits during the entirety of this administrative leave period.
  • Work Responsibilities: You are not required or expected to perform any work-related tasks during this period of administrative leave.
  • Office Attendance: You are not required or expected to come to the office during this time.
  • Email Access: Your email access will be suspended. Please make sure that your address of record and contact information are current with your agency.

We will provide you with updates as soon as they are available. We appreciate your patience and cooperation.

If you have any concerns or questions, please contact [Designated Contact Person] at [Email].

Respectfully,

[Name/Title of Authorizing Official]

[Office/Agency]


[-] glans@hexbear.net 61 points 3 months ago

how is pinterest still on that list but even reddit and youtube are not?

36

u ever?

9

Country Joe & the Fish: Feeling Like I'm Fixin To Die Rag

currently working invidious: https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=ft0vkKCadgk

even as a kid I though the "F U C K" part at the beginning was kind of corny.

Anyone else love some baby boomer shit? When I was growing up it was the only role model available of people who had fought against the American state, the status quo, capitalism, imperialism, etc. And you got the vague impression they won even if the details weren't too clear and it seemed like all these things were still happening.

28
submitted 3 months ago by glans@hexbear.net to c/technology@hexbear.net
24

In one of the many ironies of an autocratic Chinese state built on an official ideology of communism but funded by unbridled capitalism, Xiaohongshu shares the same name as the book of Mao Zedong’s writings that became a symbol of the Cultural Revolution in the 1960s and 70s.

The “red” of that title referred to leftist ideology, but the modern-day “red” is a reference to hot fashions and trends. Perhaps the only things the two red books share are their wild popularity at home and fears about their impact beyond China’s border.

Young social media users said they rarely see overt Chinese propaganda, and that occasional clumsy attempts to promote their neighbour at Taiwan’s expense are more likely to make them laugh than change their politics. “You just have to be aware, and it will be OK [using Chinese apps],” said Lo, the student artist who mostly uses two obscure apps, Bilibili and Lofter.

“We saw one Taiwanese celebrity interviewed on Chinese state media, saying: ‘The seafood in China is so good – we don’t have that in Taiwan.’ We just thought it was funny,” she added. Taiwan, surrounded by rich fishing grounds, is famous for its cuisine, including seafood.

Politicians and experts say this kind of heavy-handed messaging is not their main concern. They fear content on the apps carries subtle messages about language and culture which attempt to deny or even erase the existence of a Taiwanese national and cultural identity.

“The Chinese Communist party wants Taiwanese people to love Chinese culture,” said Wang, the educator. “They hope that by convincing the students or young people to agree on the culture, it can help them agree on Chinese politics and government … maybe convince the Taiwanese students that we are all Chinese.”

full text

‘Into brain and the heart’: how China is using apps to woo Taiwan’s teenagers

Lifestyle and shopping apps are the latest weapons in Beijing’s information war against its neighbour

Emma Graham-Harrison and Chi-hui Lin in Taichung

Sun 13 Aug 2023 10.00 CEST

Ariel Lo spends a couple of hours most weeks sharing anime art and memes on Chinese apps, often chatting with friends in China in a Mandarin slightly different from the one she uses at home in Taiwan.

“People use English on Instagram, and for Chinese apps they use Chinese phrases. If I am talking to friends in China, I would use them,” Lo said as she picked up a bubble tea at a street market in central Taichung city.

The 18-year-old Earth sciences student, who creates art in her spare time, is part of a generation whose online life is increasingly influenced by content from China. That is worrying politicians and experts who fear young Taiwanese drawn to shop and entertain themselves on apps ultimately controlled by Beijing may be getting more than style tips, and sharing more than memes.

Social media companies can harvest valuable data and shape perspectives through the algorithms that control what posts viewers see. The FBI last year warned that TikTok and its Chinese counterpart, Douyin. were a threat to national security.

In Taiwan, those worries are particularly acute. China has made clear that it wants to take control of Taiwan, by force if necessary; and the two share a common language. That makes Chinese apps, music and drama particularly attractive and accessible to the Taiwanese and Taiwanese users a particularly important audience for Beijing.

“The similarities in language make the risk higher,” said Josh Wang of the Taiwan Pang-phuann Association of Education, which is building an education programme to make Taiwanese students more aware of online risks and how to protect themselves. “Students in Taiwan don’t necessarily care much about politics, so when it comes to finding entertainment, it’s convenient and easy to [use Chinese apps].”

He sees the influence of those shows, songs and memes spreading in Taiwan in the way that young people speak. Lo may restrict her use of phrases from China to chats on the apps, but others are sounding more like teenagers across the Taiwan Strait. “For example, my own students start using language in daily life like niubi [a popular Chinese slang word equating to ‘super cool’],” said Wang.

The two Chinese apps that are most popular in Taiwan are Douyin – the Chinese version of TikTok, run by the same parent company, ByteDance – and Xiaohongshu, or “little red book”, a lifestyle and social shopping site dubbed the “Chinese Instagram”.

In December last year, the Taiwanese government barred public sector employees from using TikTok and Xiaohongshu on official phones and other devices.

“Taiwan is the frontline of China’s information war,” said Chui Chih-Wei, a lawmaker from Taiwan’s ruling Democratic Progressive party, who wants to see the government ban matched by the private sector to protect Taiwan’s economy.

“It is impossible to ban these apps entirely as we are a democratic country, but today we already see the first small success. Now we should encourage big companies in Taiwan to ban it – ones linked to national security, to energy,” he said. “It takes time to get big firms behind something like this.”

Cultural influence is a relatively new concern for Taiwan. Decades ago, it was a style and culture beacon for China as the country struggled out of Maoist drabness and conformity, looking to icons like the Taiwanese singer Teresa Teng and the director Ang Lee. Now, older Taiwanese watch Chinese historical dramas and soap operas, and the younger generation is hooked on apps.

The Taiwanese government is worried about teenagers using TikTok and its Chinese version, Douyin. Photograph: Social Media

Scarlett Ling is a firm supporter of Taiwanese independence, and a heavy user of Douyin. “I am so bored, I use it every day for over two hours,” the 16-year-old admitted as she browsed a market in central Taichung city with a friend.

She worries about her data being siphoned off to servers controlled by Beijing, and refuses requests for her ID number. But the Chinese app has “better filters”, and she insists she steers clear of politics anyway. “I am just using it for lifestyle inspiration ... I certainly can’t be influenced [about politics].”

Rochelle Hsieh, a 21-year-old business logistics student snapping pictures of possible outfits in a Taipei clothes shop, said she gets much of her inspiration from Xiaohongshu, and spends two or three hours a day on there and Instagram.

In one of the many ironies of an autocratic Chinese state built on an official ideology of communism but funded by unbridled capitalism, Xiaohongshu shares the same name as the book of Mao Zedong’s writings that became a symbol of the Cultural Revolution in the 1960s and 70s.

The “red” of that title referred to leftist ideology, but the modern-day “red” is a reference to hot fashions and trends. Perhaps the only things the two red books share are their wild popularity at home and fears about their impact beyond China’s border.

Young social media users said they rarely see overt Chinese propaganda, and that occasional clumsy attempts to promote their neighbour at Taiwan’s expense are more likely to make them laugh than change their politics. “You just have to be aware, and it will be OK [using Chinese apps],” said Lo, the student artist who mostly uses two obscure apps, Bilibili and Lofter.

“We saw one Taiwanese celebrity interviewed on Chinese state media, saying: ‘The seafood in China is so good – we don’t have that in Taiwan.’ We just thought it was funny,” she added. Taiwan, surrounded by rich fishing grounds, is famous for its cuisine, including seafood.

Politicians and experts say this kind of heavy-handed messaging is not their main concern. They fear content on the apps carries subtle messages about language and culture which attempt to deny or even erase the existence of a Taiwanese national and cultural identity.

“The Chinese Communist party wants Taiwanese people to love Chinese culture,” said Wang, the educator. “They hope that by convincing the students or young people to agree on the culture, it can help them agree on Chinese politics and government … maybe convince the Taiwanese students that we are all Chinese.”

Beijing has described its propaganda strategy for Taiwan as “into the island, into the household, into the brain, into the heart”, an approach that clearly aims to exploit popular culture, sociologist Wang Horng-Luen wrote in a recent article about China’s soft-power influence.

Thinking that China is the root of culture will loosen the foundation of Taiwan’s sense of community

Wang Horng-Luen

A professor at the sociology department of the National Taiwan University, he said that Chinese content can reinforce colonial narratives that erase or minimise Taiwanese identity and culture. “Thinking that China is the root of culture ... will indeed loosen the foundation of Taiwan’s sense of community,” he wrote. It may also lead to “blind worship and dependence on China”.

Students spend on average five hours a day online, outside of class, and more than two-thirds say they get most of their news and information from the internet, Wang’s team working on social media education found. Media literacy classes are compulsory, but schools have not kept pace with student lives. Nearly nine out of 10 students think they have seen false information online, but two-thirds never or rarely used fact checking.

“The education system requires media literacy classes, but teachers have no idea how to teach it,” Wang said. “They teach how to read a newspaper with a critical perspective. But the students don’t read newspapers.”


80
i hate tom paris (hexbear.net)

he is the worst regular in all of the treks I have seen (TOS/TNG/DS9/VOY/ENT)

his whole thing is representing White american baby boomer dudes

boring as shit

doesn't belong in space

Torres can do so much better.

I don't believe this shit about being such a hot shot pilot.

I think he was sent by the CIA.

[-] glans@hexbear.net 48 points 3 months ago

So we've taught the computers to do black face and be pretendians.

[-] glans@hexbear.net 49 points 4 months ago

the comments on that thread

39
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by glans@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

Order of 23 December 2024

Order of 23 December 2024 - 196-20241223-ord-01-00-en.pdf

Obligations of Israel in relation to the presence and activities of the United Nations, other international organizations and third States in and in relation to the Occupied Palestinian Territory

(Request for advisory opinion)

No. 196 23 December 2024

ORDER

The President of the International Court of Justice,

Having regard to Articles 48, 65 and 66 of the Statute of the Court and to Articles 103, 104 and 105 of the Rules of Court;

Whereas on 19 December 2024 the United Nations General Assembly adopted, at the 54th meeting of its Seventy-Ninth Session, resolution 79/232, by which it decided, in accordance with Article 96 of the Charter of the United Nations, to request the International Court of Justice, pursuant to Article 65 of the Statute of the Court, to render an advisory opinion;

Whereas certified true copies of the English and French texts of that resolution were transmitted to the Court under cover of a letter from the Secretary-General of the United Nations dated 20 December 2024 and received on 23 December 2024; Whereas paragraph 10 of this resolution reads as follows:

“The General Assembly,

........

\10. Decides, in accordance with Article 96 of the Charter of the United Nations, to request the International Court of Justice, pursuant to Article 65 of the Statute of the Court, on a priority basis and with the utmost urgency, to render an advisory opinion on the following question, considering the rules and principles of international law, as regards in particular the Charter of the United Nations, international humanitarian law, international human rights law, privileges and immunities applicable under international law for international organizations and States, relevant resolutions of the Security Council, the General Assembly and the Human Rights Council, the advisory opinion of the Court of 9 July 2004, and the advisory opinion of the Court of 19 July 2024, in which the Court reaffirmed the duty of an occupying Power to administer occupied territory for the benefit of the local population and affirmed that Israel is not entitled to sovereignty over or to exercise sovereign powers in any part of the Occupied Palestinian Territory on account of its occupation:

What are the obligations of Israel, as an occupying Power and as a member of the United Nations, in relation to the presence and activities of the United Nations, including its agencies and bodies, other international organizations and third States, in and in relation to the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including to ensure and facilitate the unhindered provision of urgently needed supplies essential to the survival of the Palestinian civilian population as well as of basic services and humanitarian and development assistance, for the benefit of the Palestinian civilian population, and in support of the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination?”;

Whereas the Secretary-General indicated in his letter that, pursuant to Article 65, paragraph 2, of the Statute, all documents likely to throw light upon the question would be transmitted to the Court in due course; Whereas, by letters dated 23 December 2024, the Registrar gave notice of the request for an advisory opinion to all States entitled to appear before the Court, pursuant to Article 66, paragraph 1, of the Statute; Whereas, in view of the fact that the General Assembly has requested that the advisory opinion of the Court be rendered “on a priority basis and with the utmost urgency”, it is incumbent upon the Court to take all necessary steps to accelerate the procedure, as contemplated by Article 103 of its Rules,

  1. Decides that the United Nations and its Member States, as well as the observer State of Palestine, are considered likely to be able to furnish information on the question submitted to the Court for an advisory opinion and may do so within the time-limits fixed in this Order;

  2. Fixes 28 February 2025 as the time-limit within which written statements on the question may be presented to the Court, in accordance with Article 66, paragraph 2, of the Statute; and

Reserves the subsequent procedure for further decision.

Done in French and in English, the French text being authoritative, at the Peace Palace, The Hague, this twenty-third day of December, two thousand and twenty-four. (Signed) Nawaf SALAM, President. (Signed) Philippe GAUTIER, Registrar.


PDF original: Order of 23 December 2024 - 196-20241223-ord-01-00-en.pdf


Press release 2024/86

Case page: Advisory proceedings on the Obligations of Israel in relation to the presence and activities of the United Nations, other international organizations and third States in and in relation to the Occupied Palestinian Territory 

un-cool

ETA: I believe this case is separate from Legal Consequences arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem.

[-] glans@hexbear.net 48 points 4 months ago

I stumbled on this website that maybe possibly someone here might find of interest: https://headline.nolog.cz/ It's by some lefty nerds.

It change tracks czech headlines from RSS feeds using red=deleted green=added (sorry color blind folks). Some basic filters but nothing fancy. So when they edit the original headline you can see it:

As I do not read czech I am using Firefox's built in translation. (Which is expanded recently tho mostly European languages.) It keeps up pretty good considering all the sentences are malformed. Web site is FLOSS (docker), so could be re deployed to another language.

They have available if you want the full archive of article changes in CSV format which is 12mb to download, 60mb when extracted, and 176,000 lines long. Maybe sometime it would be of value. The kind of thing that needs to be proactively collected.

[-] glans@hexbear.net 50 points 5 months ago

You know about 10 years ago a friend of mine was completing engineering school. They told me the basics of the program was to give you a framework so you will know what questions to ask and how to conduct an effective web search. The education was totally predicated on constant access to the internet.

So the good news is this isn't new, the bad news is it is in line with prior culture.

[-] glans@hexbear.net 68 points 6 months ago

Someone is going to have to step up to be Dr. Morgentaler

On October 17, 1967, he presented a brief on behalf of the Humanist Association of Canada before a House of Commons Health and Welfare Committee that was investigating the issue of illegal abortion. Morgentaler stated that women should have the right to safe abortion. The reaction to his public testimony surprised him: he began to receive calls from women who wanted abortions. Robert Malcolm Campbell and Leslie Alexander Pal wrote, "Henry Morgentaler experienced the [abortion] law's limitations directly in the supplications of desperate women who visited his Montreal office." Morgentaler's initial response was to refuse:

"I hadn't expected the avalanche of requests and didn't realize the magnitude of the problem in immediate, human terms. I answered, 'I sympathize with you. I know your problem, but the law won't let me help you. If I do help you, I'll go to jail, I lose my practice—I have a wife and two children. I'm sorry, but I just can't!'"

For a time he was able to refer the women to two other doctors who did abortions, but they became unavailable. There was no one to whom he could send them, and some of them were ending up in the emergency department after amateur abortions. He has said that he felt like a coward for sending them away and that he was shirking his responsibility. Eventually, in spite of the risks to himself—loss of career, a prison term for years or for life—he decided to perform abortions and, at the same time, challenge the law. ...

He knew that he could prevent those unnecessary deaths, so he determined to use civil disobedience to change the law.

In 1968, Morgentaler gave up his family practice and began performing abortions in his private clinic. He devoted his clinic to performing abortions on women as well as providing birth control and contraceptives, though it was illegal at the time.

Read the rest of the article to learn about how as a child in Poland he was incarcerated in nazi concentration camps for being jewish. Then as an adult in Quebec, incarcerated for performing abortions.

[-] glans@hexbear.net 56 points 9 months ago

If it wanted to, could China decisively step in between Israel and the remains of Palestine?

Pro

  • China is massive in all ways
  • Palestine is righteous

Con / risks

  • Israel is fucking insane
[-] glans@hexbear.net 53 points 1 year ago

Just a question. I know it is pointless to refute the non-logic of genocide. But I keep thinking about this every time I hear about how Gaza must be carpet bombed due to how "embedded" Hamas is in the Gazan population. How there are "no civilians" in Gaza.

I obtain all value from the sidebar of the most obvious wikipedia articles which are linked.

Hamas in Gaza:

  • Population Palestinians (2016) = 4,816,503 source

  • Hamas Membership = 20,00025,000 source

  • Math: ( 25,000 / 4,816,503 ) * 100 = 0.5%

result: 0.5% Gazans in Hamas

IDF in Israel:

  • Israel 2024 population = 9,846,080 source

  • Available and "Fit" for military service = 1,499,998 males, age 17–49 (2016), 1,392,319 females, age 17–49 (2016) source

    • Total = 2,892,317
  • Math: (2,892,317 / 9,846,080) * 100 = 29%

result: 29% of the total population of Israel is available and "fit" for service in the IDF.

(If you include "unfit" people the total is 3,068,249, or 31% of population.)

The IDF % does not even count those who served in the past but are no longer "available", for example being over age 50. People who have directly on an individual, documented level participated in crimes on Palestinians. Furthermore it does not exclude children (28% of Israeli population is <= 14 source). If only adults were included it would be a solid majority. I think this math is pretty generous to the israeli side.

And still about 1/3 of their population seems to be directly, presently involved as combatants or potential combatants.

It seems to me that if I were Israel, I wouldn't be introducing an argument like this.

Is my logic flawed? Or is it just too sick to think like this?

view more: next ›

glans

joined 2 years ago