[-] Comment105@lemm.ee 26 points 15 hours ago

Not even a joke, that's a very concise way to put the argument.

[-] Comment105@lemm.ee 3 points 18 hours ago

Those 15 years of experience didn't do paid video game rant writer Ian Walker any good it seems.

But I'm not surprised a man who writes slop craves slop.

[-] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Someone?

Half the country, honey.

[-] Comment105@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The rats of Mordheim looked great. Made me want to play Vermintide. Still haven't, though.

[-] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Let's just write it out: Cover your body up with a look that is on the fashionable end of normal, but have a fit body underneath to reveal.

[-] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

You have multiple sauce cooks and they're in charge of office security?

[-] Comment105@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Sure, but sometimes Thor just says stuff.

[-] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

They should consider doing obscure 2D games instead.

[-] Comment105@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

The slutterfly shall inherit the world.

[-] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

So someone who loses a lot of weight and gets really, really slutty as soon as they realize they can?

[-] Comment105@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

I read this in the style of "Normal Tuesday Night for Shia Labeouf"

[-] Comment105@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago

Well, to put it succinctly:

172
submitted 1 month ago by Comment105@lemm.ee to c/games@sh.itjust.works

It is at 361,826 out of 1,000,000 signatures with the remaining trickle after the initial spike nowhere near the pace needed to hit the mark before the 31st of July 2025.

(https://www.reddit.com/r/StopKillingGames/comments/1flaevi/let_me_put_the_current_campaign_progress_into_a/)

I interpret the state of Ross Scott's SKG campaign like this:
It's pretty clear that democratically speaking, we do not object to companies arbitrarily removing access to purchased video games. Only a minority objects to it.

While it will stay up and get more signatures, there will ultimately be no follow-through to this campaign. The reality is that it's not politically sound, it's not built on a foundation of a real public desire for change. In other words, voters don't want it. You might, but most of your family and friends don't want it.

197
submitted 3 months ago by Comment105@lemm.ee to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
-22
submitted 1 year ago by Comment105@lemm.ee to c/meta@lemm.ee

Too many users here prefer smaller communities and have openly stated they aren't interested in making accommodations to pursue growth to a truly large platform, even if it could be.

Lemmy is the sort of site that will linger in the background and quietly die out, it'll occassionally be mentioned in the same sorts of conversation that bring up old alternatives like voat, rare conversations with few readers.

I had some optimism at the growth spurt, but seeing what the opinions of users here were, that hope turned into cynicism. As I forgot about Lemmy, it's irrelevance was reinforced. It would be best, I think, if this foundation could replace its competitors. But I don't think it's going to happen.

I don't think you want common idiots to like the site.

-11
submitted 1 year ago by Comment105@lemm.ee to c/reddit@lemmy.world

I posted a comment with a link to an article on CNN and several links to architecture and construction websites. It seems like reddit doesn't like comments with untrusted links? Are they being subtly hidden from the thread?

If this is being done at any scale at all I wonder if it's a significant cause of the feeling that the internet has shrunk into a few main sites, linking to a recognizable relatively small selection of news and media sources.

1284
submitted 1 year ago by Comment105@lemm.ee to c/meta@lemm.ee
102
submitted 1 year ago by Comment105@lemm.ee to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Is it just random letters arrived to by keyboard mashing like a lot of federated websites seem, or is there any thought behind it?

53
submitted 1 year ago by Comment105@lemm.ee to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

It's always particularly nice and soft the first time you put it on, but the one I got most recently is so bad it leaves a thin but thorough coat of black fur on my arms when I take it off. What's the production methods used when making sweaters like this?

39
submitted 1 year ago by Comment105@lemm.ee to c/gaming@beehaw.org
0
submitted 1 year ago by Comment105@lemm.ee to c/meta@lemm.ee

Isn't that supposed to only happen on Posts>All>New? Shouldn't Active/Hot posts require some existing engagement before appearing?

Does lemm.ee sometimes sync with federated instances, which is when new content floods en masse?

This is one of the experiences I've had that makes Lemmy feel far more janky than reddit.com/r/all

-2

"help" just means "a conversation"

and that really doesn't make a difference

worse, it's like you're saying "If you have cancer, treatment is available." but what you're actually offering is a daily bowl of fairly healthy soup. you're running exaggerated, optimistic advertising.

1

It was amazing for a decade or two, but now the night scares me, I do not know what awaits us in the morning.

0
submitted 1 year ago by Comment105@lemm.ee to c/meta@lemm.ee

I think this place is too fragmented into instances to ever generate a front page anywhere near what r/all is.

If I understand this page right, https://lemm.ee will never show the top post of the day from https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/, https://discuss.tchncs.de/, or https://feddit.uk/.

And the "front page/general" site is already split into several instances (https://vlemmy.net/, https://lemmy.world/, https://sh.itjust.works/, https://lemmy.fmhy.ml/ and https://lemmy.one/, all claiming to be "a general front page lemmy instance")

So what's the deal, which one are we betting on as the place to direct all the new traffic? What's the contender for primary public internet bulletin board? Right now the arrow to an alternative is looking like this: https://i.imgur.com/L1XsBy6.pngd

I'm personally guessing the conclusion is already reached; We have no place we're betting on. We're disinterested in pushing for any particular result. We don't expect people to migrate. Many might not even want them to.

view more: next ›

Comment105

joined 1 year ago