That doesn't apply when the item has ongoing costs like a land value tax. People don't bid up items that return a negative value. This is why cars go down in value over time.
A high enough land value tax is the same as a government rent amount, but still allows for individual ownership and the benefits thereof (like being able to make changes to the property)
This shit is too grey for the courts to handle properly.
Even with a video or audio recording, it's impossible to know state of mind.
As we see with this case, they can actively be saying yes or engaging with people and then say they felt they had no choice but to participate.
Without video or audio recordings, these things almost always come down to context at best, or just they said/they said at worst.
How can our justice system find anything to be true in these situations "beyond a reasonable doubt" at that point?
I'm not detracting from sexual assault being bad, it is, I'm just pointing out that there isn't a reasonable way to fix it that I've heard so far and we can't just believe every victim because we know that it's being abused (even if it's rare) by malicious actors to punish people that committed no crime.
The only actual solution I have at this point is we should just all start fucking robots, because people are stupid.