Well now I want to

I didn't read the article, i just want to rant into the void about this thing that itches in my mind when I see this topic.

I don't want a robot that looks human. Even if they manage to make one that's convincing and isn't nightmare fuel, I'm still going to be uncomfortable around it. It's because of the fact that this robot's existence would be inherently deceptive, trying to fool you into thinking you're talking to a human, only for you to find out that this thing isn't human. It falls out of the visual uncanny valley, but into an entirely new one, a more existential uncanny valley. If you want me to trust a robot, you can't make it immediately try to deceive me into thinking it's human. Look at movies and cartoons, the most appealing robots in those media are obviously robots. I'm sure there are a good few Androids that look human and are appealing in their own way, but for the most part you get things like Wall-e, or baymax, or r2d2, designs that are not trying to fool you into thinking they're human. All of those designs have a charm or appeal to them, and they all look like robots. I don't know where I'm going with this, I'm gonna go to bed.

I wouldn't complain if we brought back þe thorn.

I don't think this is misleading. Misleading is when you use technically true facts to draw someone towards an incorrect conclusion. Calling a plan unlimited then having a limit is more like fraudulent if you ask me.

I think that because of the heavily corporate nature of what it's used for and the fact that it requires certain corporate users to be on it, there will not be anything close to a FOSS LinkedIn for a very long time.

From an implementation standpoint LinkedIn is more or less just social media. I don't think hiring managers will switch their tactics over to a FOSS platform without a very strong push over a long period of time. while corporate nonsense may be pushing us that way, that same bs is a boon to them if anything.

You laugh in Linux now, but just wait until the year of the Linux desktop comes. Every malware developer on earth will be knocking on our door.

Many smart TVs still give you popups telling you to connect to the internet or they simply refuse work without connection. There's not a very good way to tell if any smart TV you get will do this ahead of time without looking over reviews, and even then many people just connect their TVs anyway so it might not show up there either.

I'd prefer to just have a display that works as a display from the start and not have to worry about it.

tips fedora

My guy, we live in a world where we are required to have a job to live. Most of those jobs are not essential for society to function. Some of these jobs make people happy and passionate, many others are soul grating and awful. This technology makes some of those enjoyable jobs much less lucrative while the product becomes worse. We simply lose things that bring people joy and for what? Like seriously, I cannot think of something an ai can bring to the table that a human cannot in terms of art.

Why would you want to remove the jobs people enjoy and are passionate about just for the sake of it? Why would you campaign to strictly make people less happy? If it wasn't for the horrible system we live in I'd be all for this kind of advancement, but it does not make life easier, it does not get us better things, and it almost exclusively makes life worse for millions of people with nothing to show for it.

I would simply prefer my car didn't have any screens at all. If a new car just powered off the screen while not using the backup camera it'd have my attention so fast.

I can't believe how fucked this is. Social media isn't always the healthiest thing, but banning it? I was hardly allowed to leave my house as a kid, i have no idea what i would've done if i couldn't talk to my peers online.