455
submitted 11 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Tesla has removed Disney+ from some of its vehicles amid Elon Musk having an online fight with Disney CEO Bob Iger. The fight started when Disney halted its advertising on X after Musk agreed with and amplified antisemitic content, for which he eventually apologized.

Every week, there’s a new drama with Elon Musk on X, formerly known as Twitter. It sometimes indirectly affects Tesla, but this time, it affects it directly.

The current drama stems from Musk giving support to an antisemitic post on X, which he didn’t initially apologize for, though admitted that it was a mistake a week later. He further apologized but was already attacking Disney. In the meantime, the result was a massive backlash, where many companies stopped advertising on X, including Apple and Disney.

Musk took a particular issue with frequent right-wing target Disney – in the interview when he apologized for the tweet, he attacked advertisers for pulling out almost in the same breath.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch 301 points 11 months ago

Imagine buying an extremely expensive luxury vehicle, whose features are completely at the whim of some thin skinned billionaire.

Just remotely turning on and off different things in your car depending on who pissed him off, or pandered to him, that week.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 74 points 11 months ago

LOL. Teslas cars are, for the most part, not "expensive luxury vehicles". The brand as a whole is on par with Ford in terms of pricing. The air of luxury is yet another fallacy we cooked up in our heads with no evidence to support it; just like "Elon is a genius".

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 70 points 11 months ago

Firmware update: vehicle now blocked from all McDonald’s drive-thru’s after Elon spilled his coffee this morning. It was hot.

[-] FalseDiamond@sh.itjust.works 52 points 11 months ago

The lawsuit you're referring to is about a poor old woman who got second degree burns, took McD to court and won, all while being slandered by the media for being some litigation happy grifter. Just saying.

[-] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 33 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I am aware, yes. The injuries she got were pretty bad. The attorneys also successfully argued that McDonald’s coffee was substantially hotter than any other coffee and that the degrees of difference caused the need for skin grafts. Colder coffee would simply not have caused that severity of injury.

But, as we all know: that doesn’t make for good headlines. So ‘woman sues over hot coffee’ is what stuck.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 33 points 11 months ago

And the whole "she spilled some mildly hot coffee and got dollar signs in her eyes" narrative was cooked up by McDonald's. They couldn't win in court, so they tried to shape the public narrative to portray the poor woman as seeking a payday.

In reality, she only initially wanted McDonald's to pay her medical bills. They could have made the entire thing go away for $20,000. Instead, McDonald's opted to spend likely millions not only on lawyers, but on a public relations campaign to defame this poor woman.

[-] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

Not just very bad. Fucked up her vajayjay bad.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] thecrotch@sh.itjust.works 14 points 11 months ago

I know this because someone reminds everyone every single time this lawsuit gets mentioned in any context

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] garretraziel@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

They are just happy that Elon didn’t have a beef with Tesla’s breaks supplier.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] glimse@lemmy.world 144 points 11 months ago

Oh no, now what will I watch while autopilot launches me into the side of a truck?

[-] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 53 points 11 months ago

I am sure you can still watch OAN

[-] glimse@lemmy.world 34 points 11 months ago

But I wanted to die to Moana :(

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

See the light as it shines on the sea It's blinding But no one knows, how deep it goes And it seems like it's calling out to me, so come find me And let me know What's beyond that line, will I cross that line

[-] glimse@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

LET ME CROSS THAT LINE ELON YOU BASTARD

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

See the light as it shines

Did your granny say listen to your heart Be who you are on the inside I need three words to tear her argument apart Your granny lied! I'd rather be...

Shiny!! Like a treasure from a sunken pirate wreck Scrub the deck and make it look...

Shiny!! I will sparkle like a wealthy woman's neck Just a sec!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pensivepangolin@lemmy.world 107 points 11 months ago

Banning driving on the phone while allowing iPads to be put im dashboards shows how fucking stupid our legislators really are.

[-] londos@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago

Poor people can't afford Teslas so it's fine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] wizzor@sopuli.xyz 7 points 11 months ago

You can't actually watch the videos while driving tho.

I will admit I wish there were physical buttons for some things.

[-] ech@lemm.ee 17 points 11 months ago

It's not about watching video, it's about having to navigate a touchpad menu while driving. I was in a car share the other day that had a screen like that, and while driving on the highway, it changed itself from the navigation screen to tire pressure information, forcing the driver to exit that inane notification and navigate all the way back to the navigation screen, again, on the highway. It's absolutely insane.

[-] reversebananimals@lemmy.world 91 points 11 months ago

Ah yes, the famous cancel culture that the Right hates so much. I'm sure they'll turn on Elon for this.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

They already aren't buying electric cars lol

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

The whole "Elon swings hard right while trying to sell electric cars" is crazy. It would be like me selling "roll coal" kits and deciding that my market had to be Progressives because I was going to insult everyone on the right.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 11 months ago

Punishing your customers because Mickey Mouse made you cry. Just Elon Things!

[-] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 48 points 11 months ago

If I was ever going to get a Tesla, this would convince me not to. It's bad enough when cars have built in features blocked by subscriptions like heated seats, or apps removed due to contract disputes like YouTube. But having your entire car at the whim of someone like this is wild. Imagine you can't use your GPS because you made a post he didn't like.

Also, is this legal? It kinda feels like extortion at least. Maybe false advertisement if it was an advertised feature.

[-] tburkhol@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Also, is this legal?

Legal? Defintely: it's at most a civil disagreement between corporate-preople. If it were anyone other than Elon, I'd be sure that the contracts included some kind of termination clause that lets Tesla do this, possibly by still paying Disney+, possibly by paying Disney a termination fee. Because it's Elon, I'd say there's probably a lawsuit incoming, just as soon as Disney Legal's printers finish the gold leaf trim on 1000 page filing.

[-] supercritical@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

I think they’re looking for more a consumer perspective. Disney will probably sue for a breach of contract, but I also wouldn’t be surprised if they somehow ended up signing a TOS that allows Tesla to make changes whenever they want. From a consumer perspective, definitely legal to just remove an app. False advertising? Nah, when you buy the car/use the infotainment center, you’re agreeing to a TOS that requires you give your first born to the gigafactory they built.

Seriously though, it’s very standard practice that a TOS includes language that the service can change in quality at any given time with no warning.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 43 points 11 months ago

Hold the fuck up, they've got televisions in cars?

And we're puzzled about why Tesla owners crash more than everyone else?

Mystery fucking solved, boys.

[-] bill_buttlicker@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

It's only accessible while parked.

[-] YerbaYerba@lemm.ee 24 points 11 months ago

And elon's current mood.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Reddit_Is_Trash@reddthat.com 35 points 11 months ago

Anyone else think it's odd that vehicles have tv services in them?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Lophostemon@aussie.zone 29 points 11 months ago

Yeah! That’ll teach Disney! You show’em Elon!

Deny Disney of about 100 subscribers. Gosh.

[-] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

I would say 100 is optimistic. I think 0 might be a very reasonable number.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] fhek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 11 months ago

This guys skin is so thin it’s translucent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] theodewere@kbin.social 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

this is the problem with being a simple customer of one of this asshole's businesses.. you are now part of his smelly little ideological campaign, whether you like it or not..

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It was always evident since the beginning of Model S, that Tesla maintained full control of the car at all times. You never really own a Tesla.
We found that out many years ago, and already before Musk behaved clearly crazy as he does now, we decided we would never buy a Tesla under those terms.
Remember when he turned a Tesla off, because the owner gave it a bad customer review?

Today Tesla is not exactly known for good service:
https://www.trustpilot.com/review/tesla.com

This was also so predictable, turning off features when the car is resold:
https://www.theverge.com/2020/2/6/21127243/tesla-model-s-autopilot-disabled-remotely-used-car-update

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

What a thin-skinned wanker

[-] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

as long as Musk is hurting customers on purpose for his personal vedettas I will laugh at his claims of making the earth a better place.

the billionaire-mindset is toxicity

[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 14 points 11 months ago

A classic petty oligarch tantrum.

[-] ClydapusGotwald@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

As a Tesla model 3 owner, musk scares me on his lunatic whims that he could just fuck my car over. Only reason I got a Tesla was because it is one of the top EVs. Love my Tesla but hate musk. The company would be so much better without that deranged sad little man.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] gamingdexter@lemmy.ml 11 points 11 months ago

I'm sure the Tesla shareholders will be so pleased with this change. Rivian won't even need to make a decent R2 to have customers move over, Elon continues to keep screwing things up. He needs to stop and take a back seat on everything, mans an idiot when it comes to most changes/ideas

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BaardFigur@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Why did they have Disney+ to begin with lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] richteratmosphere@sh.itjust.works 10 points 11 months ago

I just received a Tesla software update and Disney+ still works.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

So, have conservatives started buying his cars en masse yet because of these shenanigans?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] orclev@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Oh no, anyway.

[-] jaschen@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 11 months ago

Legit question. Are Tesla OS hackable yet? I would love to have full control over my car.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago

Of course, the other advertisers are all going back to Twitter.

This is a soap opera for billionaire jock sniffers.

[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago

I was thinking it was weird to watch Disney while driving, but I guess people who can afford an unused car can afford to have kids while keeping them both fed and entertained.

[-] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Can you imagine trying to explain this headline to someone from say, 1970? They’d have a stroke.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
455 points (96.0% liked)

News

23284 readers
1517 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS