[-] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 35 points 4 days ago

"Let me do a check to see if I give you the right blood... Nope, not with a 5. Here's your blood orange juice."

[-] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

That's not necessarily why you take drugs.

Uppers like cocaine (which he was very fond of at the time) are often consumed to be more productive or to "enhance" an otherwise already positive time. From what I've heard, he was introduced to coke at a party, which makes perfect sense. Cocaine abuse starts with making a party exhilarating, then it continues with giving you so much energy while working, finally you simply take the stuff because your brain doesn't know how to work with natural levels or serotonin/dopamine/noradrenaline anymore.

To name another class of drugs, taking psychedelics (which I haven't heard of King having much business with) to hide from your inner demons would be a profoundly bad move since those tend to forcibly confront you with yourself. Great if you have the feeling that deep down there's something you need to address but you don't know what. Terrible if you know there's something but you can't handle dealing with it.

Downers like cannabis (which King apparently did at least occasionally use) can be used to silence the bad thoughts. Putting up a smokescreen between your conscious and your subconscious isn't exactly the best way of handling things but at least you're not pouring fuel onto the fire.

Drugs of all kinds can still take your mind in directions you normally would've shied away from, that's true. And a sustained drug habit of any kind is often indicative of an underlying problem; happy people don't mess with their brain chemistry as often. The specific underlying problem can vary wildly – unassisted psychological distress, physiological issues like chronic pain, performance anxiety, peer pressure... the list goes on and on.

Of course, given that King also had a sustained alcohol problem and apparently at one point abused everything he could get his hands on, he definitely seems like someone who couldn't handle what was going on inside of his head. Thankfully he had the support he needed to overcome his drug problem.

[-] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 80 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

So Kaspersky found out that MD5 passwords are unsafe. That's literally 20 year old news. Actually, Kaspersky found out that brute-forcing MD5 on consumer-grade hardware has become slightly faster than two years ago, which makes me wonder if Captain Obvious's secret identity is that of a Kaspersky cybersecurity expert.

El Reg concludes from this that we should ditch passwords, which they back up with the opinion of a second expert. This expert immediately tells them they're wrong, that passwords are perfectly fine if used with MFA, and that a lack of public knowledge about basic cybersecurity is the real issue. They somehow treat this as him agreeing with them.

Actual technological alternatives to traditional password use (such as passkeys or password managers with per-site passwords) are mentioned only as an aside or not at all. It never occurred to El Reg or Kaspersky to mention that MD5 has been considered obsolete since the days of Internet Explorer 7 and that more secure hashes like bcrypt have been around since the late 90s. For that matter, the Kaspersky source talks about rainbow tables without using the word "salt" even once.

Finally they conclude with a call to action to "improve that user security stack", arguing that passwords are inherently unsafe due to their "complex requirements and hashed storage". That's so deep into la-la land that I'm not even sure what it is they're trying to say or who they're even talking to.

That's an amazingly badly written article.

What impresses me the most is that the Kaspersky article they're talking about is just as asinine as El Reg's confused stammering. The most sense I can make out of it is that they're making a bad faith argument ("we can brute-force MD5'd passwords with a 5090 so you should use MFA") because they're trying to get nontechnical people to do the right thing and hope they can scare them into compliance if they bullshit hard enough.

Edit: I just noticed how often Kaspersky's article refers to the own password manager they sell. So their bad faith argument is really just in service of an ad that happens to contain some decent security advice.

[-] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 54 points 5 months ago

The reviews are a part of the community, even if they're not found in the "Community" part of Steam.

But yeah, EGS has many failings, pretty much all of which were pointed out right at the start. They weren't improved upon because Epic don't want to deliver the best possible experience or promote the capability of the PC as a gaming platform. They just want you to buy digital shit, get bored of it, and then buy more digital shit at the lowest possible cost to them. Effort costs money so they won't make any.

[-] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 84 points 5 months ago

Best I can do is mandatory Lumen and Nanite. You can get almost-stable 60 fps on a 5090 with DLSS Performance and 3x frame gen, which should be optimized enough for anyone.

My game will sell for 80 bucks, 150 if you want the edition with all the preorder-exclusive content.

[-] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 107 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

A shorthand for 000a:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:000s. It's part of the alphabet v6 spec.

[-] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago

Now the big question is how many patents are relevant and who owns them. And even if it turns out to have cheap licensing, beating HDMI won't be easy, as DisplayPort demonstrates. Technological superiority doesn't mean shit if you can't overcome HDMI's network effect.

[-] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago

Someone ziptied the ring to a 10 mm wrench socket. Wrench sockets have a reputation for inexplicably getting lost, never to be found again.

[-] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 59 points 2 years ago

There's less than thirty of these in the wild so seeing one end up as bycatch is a sobering reminder of the consequences of overfishing. If we don't start taking ocean preservation seriously we might at some point find that not just the Virginia-class but all nuclear-powered cruise missile fast attack submarines have gone extinct.

And you can't even safely eat them; they're full of heavy metals like uranium.

[-] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 59 points 2 years ago

We know that people have different chronotypes. We even know that most people of working age aren't really morning people. Unfortunately, our business world assumes a standard circadian rhythm and is structured around getting up early because people needed to use every bit of daylight way back when. So that sucks, especially if you're an evening or even night person.

[-] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 114 points 2 years ago

"Well, excuuuuuse me, princess!"

gets shot twice, just to make sure

[-] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 72 points 2 years ago

They did, about three times, each time abandoning it before the ecosystem could stabilize.

Admittedly, the last time nobody even wanted to buy in because everyone expected them to drop the OS within two years. Which they promptly did.

view more: next ›

Jesus_666

joined 2 years ago