You never had anything to gain by choosing a different word in this discussion, your goal is to prove my chosen word wrong, and you've failed so far.

Not according to a simple search, no.

My spelling is accepted when I search the word.

Yeah, I guess, but as long as the challenge is still achievable I can dig a large field.

It's easier to place and organize finished assets than to create new ones, though, so after a while a lot of it starts to feel copy-pasted. I'm sure that noticeable lack of effort will only be exasperated by modern automation.

Actually, trans is like 0.1% of the total population, so that sliver of trans people who say that should much tinier.

I have a guy who does that for me and yells a lot about positioning.

It's easy to convince people to do wrong if you convince them there is no right to be done.

That's why Tankies are so hard to tell us both sides bad.

Unfortunately no because in 1929 the House of Representatives got capped at 435. For example, a Congressman from California represented ~~494,709 people while one from New Hampshire represented 3,448 people in the year 2020.~~ Those must have been state congress numbers or something, idk, real numbers would be 750k cali and 700k NH, probably better examples out there for large differences.

Edit: these numbers are not for federal congressmen, clearly. Correction made.

You know, this would be much more accurately captioned as a map of how a president could win with as little of the popular vote as possible. Lowest possible score is 21%.