[-] gi1242@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

i use arch. I've got it set up and it works really well for me. I'd only switch if I had some feature I needed in atomic that I can't have in arch. (not just a feature atomic has, but a feature I need that atomic has)

[-] gi1242@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

how much air conditioning do you have? if you take public transport, is it air-conditioned?

[-] gi1242@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

what has red had done that makes you say the law is meaningless to them?

[-] gi1242@lemmy.world 57 points 1 week ago

support for him is still strong thanks to the propaganda machine. fox news doesn't even mention the stock market drop, but highlights important events such as Monica Lewinsky's return to Hollywoods inner circle and the 50 million saved by DOGE 🙄.

The rich still think the can profit from Trump's policies, and until that changes nothing else will matter

[-] gi1242@lemmy.world 53 points 2 months ago

Founders were looking for a 1bil payout 😂. they settled for 116mil 🤯...

why would anyone pay for a company that flopped so fantastically? this makes no sense at all...

265
submitted 2 months ago by gi1242@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

or be boring and alias sl=ls

6
submitted 3 months ago by gi1242@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Unpaid Basar journalists write story following up on the tragic death of a six-month-old girl who had got caught in a crossfire the previous year as well as landmine deaths in the region. They also report on conditions of new schools, the salaries of teachers and the implementation of government schemes in the area.

One of the authors is murdered and his body is found in a septic tank in the area near his home. He was 32 years old. The main suspect was Contractor Suresh Chandrakar, who had recently had an extravagant wedding for which he’d used a helicopter and organised Russian dancers, and was a distant relative of the victim.

[-] gi1242@lemmy.world 95 points 3 months ago

not mildly infuriating. it's very infuriating

41
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by gi1242@lemmy.world to c/fediverse@lemmy.world

his post on mastodon is here:

https://mastodon.social/@pixelfed/113849098386232034

Dear Mark, I hope this finds you well. I noticed something interesting today - it seems Instagram is blocking links to my little open-source project. You know, the one that lets people share photos without harvesting their personal data or forcing algorithmic feeds on them. I have to admit, I'm flattered. Who would've thought a small team of volunteers could build something that would catch your attention? We're just trying to give people a choice in how they share their memories online. No VCs, no surveillance capitalism, just code and community. Remember when Facebook started? It was about connecting people, not maximizing engagement metrics. Our project might be tiny compared to Instagram, but we're staying true to that original spirit of social media - giving people control over their online presence without turning them into products. You could've ignored us. Instead, by blocking our links, you've given us the best endorsement we could ask for. You've confirmed what we've been saying all along - that big tech is more interested in protecting their walled gardens than fostering genuine innovation. Every time you block a link to our platform, you remind people why we built it in the first place. Your action tells them there are alternatives worth exploring, ones that respect their privacy and agency. So thank you, Mark. You've turned our little project into a symbol of resistance against digital monopolies.

4
submitted 3 months ago by gi1242@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
11
  1. world changing technology, with eerie undertones

  2. undertones manifest as really dark consequences

  3. action sequence leaving a few reformed protagonists to carry on the good fight

[-] gi1242@lemmy.world 47 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

you should especially do this on Friday 5:00pm in production, right before going on an international vacation with bad Internet.

68
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by gi1242@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world
[-] gi1242@lemmy.world 62 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

he's not in the slightest bit worried. his boss got away with worse, and as long as he toes the line he will be fine

237
[deleted] (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by gi1242@lemmy.world to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world

[deleted]

[-] gi1242@lemmy.world 60 points 5 months ago

if you're planning to leave because trump got elected, then be warned. the UK has similar problems

39
[deleted] (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by gi1242@lemmy.world to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world

[deleted]

122
[deleted] (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by gi1242@lemmy.world to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world

[deleted]

312
[deleted] (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by gi1242@lemmy.world to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world

[deleted]

1275
[deleted] (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by gi1242@lemmy.world to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world

[deleted]

630
[deleted] (lemmy.world)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by gi1242@lemmy.world to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world

[deleted]

[-] gi1242@lemmy.world 79 points 6 months ago

normally when they say slashing throat, I assume death. looks like the girl was ok though cause she ran home to get help

[-] gi1242@lemmy.world 58 points 11 months ago

iwriting reviews is time consuming, unpaid, and doesn't help the reviewers career. so it takes a while because reviewers are already busy and don't prioritize writing reviews too much.

quality of the reviews is questionable. 10% of the reviews are through and provide valuable feedback. the remaining 90% are cursory "yeah this is interesting, publish it" or "not interesting/outside scope".

very very few reviews find and report scientific errors

[-] gi1242@lemmy.world 115 points 11 months ago

academic journals now only provide a service to authors. they used to distribute... but the articles are available free on the arxiv, pubmed, authors websites, etc. the peer review and typesetting journals do is a joke and no author will pay for that.

the value journals have now is mainly to the author, because the prestige of getting accepted by the journal helps with the authors career. publishers figured out that authors will pay for this, so here we are ... 🙄

view more: next ›

gi1242

joined 2 years ago