410
Publish it or fuck off
The fact that he's saying it instead of publishing is how you know he's not for real
Counter-offer: hacking wants that sweet sweet BTC payout.
Or baguettes
Maybe we don't doxx the witnesses, okay?
So, just let him get away with it then? Because, Canadian, that’s what will happen.
No you redact it first.
Any idiot with Adobe Acrobat can do that. It shouldn't delay anything.
The delay is that it’s not real.
Edit: the hack part
Agreed. Clogging up our news cycle with B.S.
Witness prolly has the very real fear of “they release it, he gets confirmed anyway, Gaetz throws the book at him.” Easy for keyboard warriors to chide this person with no consequences to themselves.
I can't remember exactly how it was said but, "The internet is all gas no breaks. Random strangers will hype you up and gleefully watch you ruin your life."
So black out the name and release it.
Then why perform the hack in the first place? It doesnt add up unless the dude is just trying to blackmail into $
I don't think that would have the effect within the legal system that you think it might have
Can’t know if it isn’t released
Still good to have it out there.
Publish or shut the fuck up
Oh please...let this be true...Let Gaetz squirm like the spineless pedo he is
he's not in the slightest bit worried. his boss got away with worse, and as long as he toes the line he will be fine
Exaclty. Blackmail only works if the target has a sense of shame, and clearly MAGAts abandones theirs long ago.
:'(
I always thought it was "tows" lol
It won’t change anything. The pedophiles are in power.
Yeah I don't even think they are going to do confirmations like they usually do. Trump already said he wants recess appointments and he always gets everything he wants from these idiots
The hacker won't release shit. Nothing will happen. Everything will continue on like normal. We've been hearing about damning evidence about multiple people for years now. Here we are with none of it.
Still waiting on that Redditor to reveal the gay senator he was having an affair with.
Ohhh, that fiction. I forgot about that.
Release the pedofiles!!
A file with damaging information about Gaetz?
Isn’t that like... any news article covering him?
If they had it, they’d release it. There’s no extortion to be had here, no reason to delay. The only reason to have gotten it would be to release it. That they haven’t- pretty much means they haven’t got anything.
Well it has all the info to completely dox anyone who testified against the ~~attorney~~ child rapist general. Magas would literally kill them where they sleep.
Who cares anymore? You guys voted a criminal into power. Facts don't matter anymore.
Facts
This isn't a hack, that is just the cover for a leak.
release it, or shut the hell up. Not that it will change anything.
An amazing number of “secure links” sure turn out to not be that. Damn humans.
Publish it now
It will change nothing
If released, I hope that the victim/witness information is redacted, unless of course this is a hack done by the Right to get the women's names out to the cult so they can do what the cult does best. =(
conservatives do not care about this. this is not what they care about. they don't care. it does not matter. liberals will never figure this out.
We know they don't care. 🤷♂️
We care, that's why it's being discussed.
Or Trump has someone from russia hack gaetz files so they can't be used in court.
With all the shitty news out there, I'm begging the hackers to throw us a bone and release the files. I mean c'mon ... were dying here.
Smart, they can't smoke out the whistleblower if there is no whistleblower.
Let it have reach and traction in a way it can't be ignored, can't be doubted.
Gaetz would have been around 35 at the time.
A child!
Meanwhile we're trying 10 year olds as adults...
Crimew?
this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
410 points (97.9% liked)
News
36366 readers
782 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS