6

Lyrics: https://genius.com/Kneecap-hood-lyrics

"H.O.O.D" by Kneecap explores themes of violence, social marginalization, and identity in a gritty urban setting. The song paints a vivid picture of the harsh reality faced by individuals living on the margins of society. Through the lens of the characters portrayed in the lyrics, the song delves into the struggles, conflicts, and defiance of those labeled as "low life scum" by society.

In the first verse, the lyrics depict a scene of chaos and aggression, with references to drug use and confrontations with authority figures like the R.U.C. The repetition of the phrase "Troid eile" (another fight) emphasizes a cycle of violence and recklessness. The use of Irish language and slang adds authenticity to the storytelling, anchoring the narrative in a specific cultural context. The reference to "Tiocfaidh ár lá" (Our day will come) reflects a sense of defiance and resistance against perceived oppressors.

The chorus, with its catchy repetition of "I’m a H - Double O - D. Low life scum, that’s what they say about me," serves as a defiant anthem reclaiming the negative labels imposed by society. The verses feature vivid descriptions of daily struggles, substance abuse, and criminal activities, highlighting the realities of survival and self-expression in a challenging environment. The imagery of a "blood bath" and physical confrontations underscores the brutal nature of life in the "H.O.O.D" while also hinting at a sense of camaraderie and solidarity among the characters.

In conclusion, "H.O.O.D" by Kneecap offers a raw and unfiltered portrait of life on the fringes of society, capturing the defiance, camaraderie, and struggles of individuals labeled as outcasts. The lyrics blend Irish language, slang, and vivid imagery to create a narrative that is both provocative and poignant, shedding light on the complex dynamics of identity, violence, and survival in a marginalized community. By challenging stereotypes and embracing their own narrative, the song's characters reflect a sense of agency and resilience in the face of societal judgment and adversity.^[[1] https://www.songtell.com/kneecap/h-o-o-d]

6

Archive Link: https://archive.is/rnFuW


Speaking on RTÉ's Prime Time on Tuesday, the band's manager said "moral hysteria" had taken hold and that the band are being held to a higher moral standard than politicians.

5
18

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/28248378

Interview about Union Workshop Event: https://lemmy.world/post/28247917


Information:

  1. UNION POWER ‘25 Conference
  2. OUR POWER IS IN OUR LABOR!
  3. BECOMING STRIKE READY IN THE GREEN MOUNTAINS!
  4. Saturday, April 26, 10AM-4PM
  5. O.N.E. Community Center, 20 Allen St., Burlington, VT 05401 US

Workshops On:

  1. Organizing a Union!
  2. Building Shop Floor Power!!
  3. Bargaining To Win!!!
  4. Becoming Strike Ready!!!!

Speakers On:

  1. The Rise of Fascism & The Challenges Facing The Labor Movement
  2. How Unions & The Working Class Must Organize To Meet These Threats & WIN

Lead Sponsors: UVM Staff United (AFT), AFSCME Local 1674, AFSCME Local 3977, UFCW Local 1459


Professional union childcare available if requested in advance. Contact: [Email, click link and scroll to this section.] The conference site is accessible.


Event by:

  1. UVM Staff United (AFT), AFSCME Local 1674, AFSCME Local 3977, UFCW Local 1459

Sponsored by:

  1. Green Mountain Labor Council, AFL-CIO Montpelier, VT
8

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/28384562

Immortal Technique suggests that the 4th branch of the American Government is the Corporate media and it has been used to corrupt people’s ideology.^[[1] https://genius.com/Immortal-technique-the-4th-branch-lyrics]

3

Immortal Technique suggests that the 4th branch of the American Government is the Corporate media and it has been used to corrupt people’s ideology.^[[1] https://genius.com/Immortal-technique-the-4th-branch-lyrics]

10

Public Enemy’s single “Don’t Believe The Hype” saw the group “fight the power” against negative press about them.

PE’s classic critique of false media was specifically aimed at then-Village Voice critic Robert Christgau, Spin’s John Leland, and radio DJ Mr. Magic, who dissed PE’s single “Public Enemy No. 1” on his WBLS radio show in 1987 by saying “No more music by the suckers.” Don’t believe the hype, indeed.

Chuck D’s handwritten lyrics below, courtesy of the Adler Archives:^[[1] https://genius.com/Public-enemy-dont-believe-the-hype-lyrics]

[Four Images] Archive Link: https://archive.is/uv6m8

5

English Lyrics: https://genius.com/Genius-english-translations-residente-this-is-not-america-ft-ibeyi-english-translation-lyrics

Que no todo lo que pasa o pasó en los Estados Unidos define lo que pasa o pasó en el continente americano o en la historia del continente mismo.

Los yanquis durante décadas se han mostrado como seres superiores diciendo que su país es el más importante no solo del continente, sino del mundo, invisibilizando el resto de países de América tratándolos de inferiores, sobretodo México por la cierta rivalidad que tienen con el caso de las inmigraciones.

Esto puede ser por culpa de los políticos ya que son probablemente la mayor esfera de influencia en la sociedad estadounidense.

Solo basta con escuchar frases como: “Welcome to America” o “This is America” cada vez que alguien llega a los Estados Unidos, frases mayormente dicha por políticos, personas de importancia norteamericanas o los principales medios de comunicación de aquel país.

Es más, los propios estadounidenses se llaman “americans” (americanos en inglés, forma indirecta de decir que ellos son América) utilizándolo como gentilicio.

En vez de ellos decir: “Yo soy estadounidense” dicen, “Soy americano”, pero lo dicen con doble sentido, refiriendose no solo a su país sino támbien al continente mismo por el dominio que su país tiene en el y en el mundo.^[[1] https://genius.com/Residente-this-is-not-america-lyrics]

Rough English Translation:

Not everything that happens or happened in the United States defines what happens or happened in the American continent or in the history of the continent itself.

The Yankees for decades have shown themselves as superior beings saying that their country is the most important not only of the continent, but of the world, making invisible the rest of the countries of America treating them as inferior, especially Mexico because of the certain rivalry they have with the case of immigrations.

This may be the fault of the politicians since they are probably the biggest sphere of influence in the American society.

It is enough to hear phrases like “Welcome to America” or “This is America” every time someone arrives in the United States, phrases mostly said by politicians, important American people or the main media of that country.

Moreover, Americans themselves call themselves “americans” (Americans in English, a roundabout way of saying that they are America) using it as a slang term.

Instead of saying: “I am American” they say, “I am American”, but they say it with double meaning, referring not only to their country but also to the continent itself because of the dominance their country has in it and in the world.

18

Released in 1989, De La Soul’s third single “Me Myself and I” established the group’s characteristic style of combining hip hop with humor and social commentary. The group’s frustration concerning their forced-upon hippie label is addressed in the typically dry humor which became the De La Soul trademark. The track contains samples of “(Not Just) Knee Deep” by Funkadelic, “Rapper Dapper Snapper” by Edwin Birdsong, and “Funky Worm” by the Ohio Players.

In the summer of 1989, it became the group’s first (and only) number one on the U.S. R&B chart and first (and only) top 40 on the Hot 100 (aside from their later collaboration with Gorillaz on “Feel Good Inc”). It also reached the top 30 in the UK and was later ranked #46 on VH1’s 100 Greatest Songs of Hip Hop.

It’s also worth noting that its music video – in which the trio are bullied for their “forced-upon” image of hippies while attending a high school class on how to be a mainstream rapper – features doppelgängers of many famous MC’s of the time, each with their own respective styles that De La Soul is not trying to copy for themselves. Lighthearted fun is had at the expense of the likes of Eric B. & Rakim, Run-D.M.C., Kool G. Rap, Doug E. Fresh and others. As the lyrics attest, they are proud of who they are as individuals.^[[1] https://genius.com/De-la-soul-me-myself-and-i-lyrics]

1

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/28152669

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/28152180

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/28151673

Timestamps and Generated Summary below:


Video Description:

Whitney Webb talks about her latest investigation into Sean “Diddy” Combs.

Timestamps:

  1. 00:00:00 Whitney Webb explains how Sean “P. Diddy” Colms relationship with Naomi Campell led her down a rabbithole
  2. 00:02:47 Similarities between the Diddy case and the Epstein Case
  3. 00:05:20 Clive Davis and Russell Simons involvement
  4. 00:10:25 James Packer, Netanyahu’s friend and neighbor, also tied up in this!

Whitney Webb has been a professional writer, researcher and journalist since 2016. She has written for several websites and, from 2017 to 2020, was a staff writer and senior investigative reporter for Mint Press News. She currently writes for Unlimited Hangout. She is the author of the book One Nation Under Blackmail. Recently her work was referenced by Ian Carroll on the Joe Rogan Podcast. Follow Whitney on X https://x.com/_whitneywebb


Generated Summary:

Main Topic:

Whitney Webb discusses her investigation into Sean "Diddy" Combs, focusing on the broader network of individuals and power structures that enabled his alleged behavior, drawing parallels to the Jeffrey Epstein case.

Key Points:

  • Diddy's Connections: The investigation explores Diddy's relationships with figures like Naomi Campbell, Clive Davis, Russell Simmons, and the influence of oligarchs like the Bronfman family on the hip-hop industry.
  • Similarities to Epstein: Webb draws parallels between the Diddy and Epstein cases, highlighting how both figures are often portrayed as masterminds while their powerful benefactors evade scrutiny.
  • Organized Crime Ties: The investigation uncovers potential links between figures in Diddy's orbit and organized crime, including connections to heroin rings, money laundering, and figures like Al Malnik (associated with Meyer Lansky).
  • Clive Davis's Role: Clive Davis is credited with enabling Bad Boy Records' success through a distribution deal with Arista Records. He was also allegedly involved in a payola scandal tied to a heroin ring.
  • Russell Simmons and Brett Ratner: Russell Simmons, along with Brett Ratner, has been accused of sex crimes. Ratner's connections to Steve Mnuchin, James Packer (involved in the Netanyahu corruption trial), and his current project directing a Melania Trump documentary are highlighted.
  • Cultural Shift and Private Prisons: The discussion touches on the alleged engineering of a cultural shift to benefit the private prison industry.
  • Industry Consolidation: Legislation passed during the Reagan, Bush, and Clinton eras allowed for industry consolidation, benefiting a small group of oligarchs.

Highlights:

  • The investigation aims to expose the broader network that enabled Diddy's alleged behavior, similar to how Webb approached the Epstein case.
  • The discussion reveals potential connections between figures in the music industry and organized crime, including money laundering schemes.
  • The video highlights the surprising connections between Brett Ratner, James Packer, Benjamin Netanyahu, and the Trump family.

Creating a Weekly Lefty Livestream & Podcast with Katie Halper

1

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/28009715

Generated Summary below:


Video Description:

Shereen Bhan joins Jeffrey D. Sachs, renowned Economics professor and bestselling author, to discuss the biggest headlines shaping the world today. From escalating US-China tensions to the economic implications, they dive into the complexities of the global landscape.

#risingbharatsummit #Tarrifs #Trump #USA #jeffreysachs #risingbharatsummit2025 #viksitbharat2047 #cnbctv18 #businessnews #businessnewstoday #businessnewsinenglish


Main Topic:

The video features an interview with economist Jeffrey Sachs, who discusses his concerns about President Trump's tariff policies and their potential to wreck the world economy.

Key Points:

  • Trump's Policies are Destructive: Sachs argues that Trump's tariff policies are reminiscent of the Smoot-Hawley tariffs of the 1930s and the Lehman Brothers collapse in 2008, both of which led to global economic crises. He believes Trump is single-handedly damaging the world economy.
  • Impact on the US Economy: Sachs suggests that the US is likely headed for a recession, potentially in 2025, due to declining consumer sentiment and disrupted supply chains.
  • China's Response: Sachs anticipates that China will continue to reduce its holdings of US dollar assets and promote alternative payment systems through BRICS. He believes China will not be bullied and will take a more leadership role on the international stage.
  • End of American Leadership: Sachs argues that Trump's policies mark the end of American leadership and the perception of the US as a global stabilizer.
  • India's Position: Sachs advises India not to be played by the US or fall into an anti-China stance. He emphasizes the importance of normal relations between India and China and suggests India should focus on multilateral trade arrangements.
  • Trump's Authority: Sachs criticizes Trump's use of emergency powers to impose tariffs, calling it unconstitutional and reckless. He also criticizes the corruption of the US political system.
  • Congress's Role: Sachs expresses disappointment in Congress's failure to check Trump's power, but suggests that pressure from donors or court challenges could potentially provide a check.

Highlights:

  • Sachs repeatedly emphasizes the severity of the situation, using strong language to describe Trump's policies as "wrecking the world economy."
  • He highlights the potential for a US recession and the disruption of global supply chains.
  • He warns India against aligning too closely with the US at the expense of its relationship with China.
  • He criticizes the US political system as corrupt and Congress as a "doormat."
  • He describes Trump's actions as "illegal" and "unconstitutional."

About Channel:

About CNBC-TV18: India's leading business news channel, CNBC-TV18 offers the most comprehensive coverage of businesses, the economy and the financial markets. Catch all your favourite shows, exclusive videos, big-ticket interviews and more here.

1

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/27283501

Generated Summary below:


Video Description:

Is the economy on the brink of collapse? Gary Stevenson and Daniel Priestley break down the emergency financial crisis no one is talking about

The Diary Of A CEO’s economics debate is joined by 2 experts: Gary Stevenson and Daniel Priestley. Gary Stevenson is a British economist, former financial trader, and author of The Trading Game. Daniel Priestly is an award-winning serial entrepreneur who has written 5 books on starting and scaling businesses.

Timestamps:

  1. 00:00 Intro
  2. 02:04 Who Is Gary Stevenson?
  3. 07:19 Who Is Daniel Priestley?
  4. 09:53 The Importance of Economic Freedom
  5. 11:46 Who Are We Blaming for the Economic Situation?
  6. 13:22 The UK & US Debt We're Carrying From COVID
  7. 17:34 Is There Financial Security for Most of Us in 2025?
  8. 26:03 What Does Gary Think of Daniel's Views?
  9. 28:47 The Current Homeownership Situation
  10. 34:11 US vs UK Market With Building Technology
  11. 36:28 Taxing Billionaires
  12. 40:52 Do You Tax Their Value or the Countries Where They Trade?
  13. 45:25 Why Are Millionaires Leaving the UK?
  14. 48:39 Stopping Profit Shifting of Companies
  15. 52:29 How $10M+ Companies Avoid Taxes
  16. 57:51 Where Is the Biggest Amount of Money Going?
  17. 59:56 How to Bring Big Tech Companies and Entrepreneurs to the UK
  18. 01:04:34 Are Tax Evasions Causing Issues With NHS, Education, and Higher Crime?
  19. 01:10:20 Why Poor People Are Struggling to Build Wealth
  20. 01:19:39 Ads
  21. 01:20:43 How to Create Wealth in the Economy
  22. 01:37:07 Monopolies
  23. 01:40:08 Advice to Younger People
  24. 01:47:01 Take Action: Play the Cards You Are Dealt
  25. 01:51:35 Do We Have Personal Responsibility to Change This?
  26. 01:53:55 Is the Current Education System Failing Us?
  27. 02:00:45 Inheritance Taxes
  28. 02:04:40 Ads
  29. 02:09:55 America's Approach to Building Wealth
  30. 02:12:23 What to Do At An Individual & Government Level

Generated Summary:

This YouTube video features a debate between Gary Stevenson (economist) and Daniel Priestley (entrepreneur) on the state of the Western economy, particularly the US and UK. They discuss wealth inequality, the impact of government policies, and the challenges facing the average person.

Main Topic: The declining economic prospects for the average person in the Western world and the causes and potential solutions.

Key Points:

  • Wealth Inequality: Both agree that wealth inequality is a significant problem, but disagree on the causes and solutions.
  • Government Policies: [Priestley] argues that government policies (high taxes, regulations, and excessive spending) have eroded economic freedom, leading to increased poverty and the exodus of wealthy individuals and businesses. Priestley acknowledges the negative impact of government overreach but emphasizes the importance of economic freedom and a smaller government.
  • Technological Disruption: Both acknowledge the transformative impact of technology, particularly in the digital economy. Priestley highlights the boom in digital businesses and the shift of wealth towards tech companies. Stevenson points out that this disruption has led to job losses and increased inequality.
  • Solutions: Stevenson advocates for higher taxes on the ultra-wealthy to fund tax cuts for working people and prevent the further concentration of wealth. Priestley emphasizes the importance of fostering economic freedom, reducing government intervention, and encouraging entrepreneurship.
  • Personal Responsibility: Both encourage personal responsibility and initiative, but Stevenson cautions against the narrative that anyone can become wealthy through entrepreneurship alone, given the systemic challenges faced by many.

Highlights:

  • The passionate and engaging debate between two experts with differing perspectives.
  • Statistical data illustrating the widening wealth gap and economic decline in the UK and US.
  • Discussion of the impact of government policies, technological disruption, and the challenges faced by young people.
  • The contrasting viewpoints on the role of government, taxation, and entrepreneurship in addressing economic inequality.
  • A call to action for viewers to educate themselves, get involved politically, and support initiatives aimed at improving economic conditions.

About Channel:

The Diary of a CEO is an unfiltered journey into the remarkable stories of the people that have defined culture, achieved greatness and created stories worth studying.

Steven sits down with some of the world's most influential people, experts and thinkers and embarks on a curiosity driven journey to discover untold truths, unlearned lessons and important insights that we hope will make his, and the audience's lives more enjoyable, more successful and more fulfilled.^[[1] https://stevenbartlett.com/doac/]

[-] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world 117 points 7 months ago

"You know what they want?

They want obedient workers.

Obedient workers.

People who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork and just dumb enough, to passively accept all these increasingly shittier jobs, with the lower pay, the longer hours, the reduced benefits, the end of overtime, and the vanishing pension that disappears the minute you go to collect it." -- George Carlin


David Graeber's book on bullshit jobs blew the myth of office productivity wide open several years ago. The elites have been promising us shorter work weeks for more than a century now. We have the technology to make it happen. As we speak, they're bragging about their new AI minions.

Of course, that article even admits that onsite employees aren’t more productive. They just find different ways to “goof off,” like shopping online or scrolling their phones. The real ire seems to stem from envy, that remote workers are capable of meeting their responsibilities while also doing healthy things and taking care of themselves, like taking a walk in the middle of the day or (gasp) even a nap. Ironically, wellness articles have been telling bosses to let their employees take walks or naps in the middle of the day for almost 20 years.

Many news outlets finally came clean last year and reported that a big chunk of companies might simply be using office return mandates as an excuse to lay off employees and “restructure” their workforce.

Anywhere from 12 to 20 percent of office space remains vacant. It’s worse than the 2008 recession. If these landlords can’t find a way to make money off their corporate real estate soon, they’re going to start defaulting on their loans. The landlords will go bankrupt, and banks will wind up with giant office towers they can’t sell. More than $1 trillion will go poof.

According to a piece in the Harvard Business Review, the $1 trillion will come due between now and 2026. That explains why CEOs keep making these edicts, and newspapers keep trying to trash remote work. As the piece explains, “The damage could metastasize into a full-blown financial crisis if scores or even hundreds of small and midsize commercial banks fail simultaneously.”

The Federal Reserve’s misguided war on inflation has made everything even worse over the last couple of years. By raising interest rates, they’ve motivated more companies to ditch their office leases. Now commercial real estate is in a death spiral that could tank the economy (again).

Major cities have spent the last several decades catering to these corporate landlords. Now their entire downtowns rely on workers for commerce. We’re talking about all those restaurants and coffee shops that serve breakfast and lunch to white-collar workers, and all the bars where people used to go and complain about work before they spent an hour commuting home.

Once again, the elite have gotten themselves into big trouble. They want the rest of us to bail them out. If they don't want our tax money, they want us to give up our freedom and autonomy. They want us to sacrifice ourselves on the altar of capitalism to protect their fortunes.

[-] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world 62 points 8 months ago

You missed the point of the post.

This goes beyond the c/vegan issue; it is addressing systematic lemmy issues between admins, moderators, and users.

[-] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world 67 points 9 months ago

Oh, I see the problem.

It's Windows 10.

[-] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world 52 points 10 months ago

It can be really crazy when you notice the differences in how other families treat each other.

Healthy communication is a must when talking with other working-class people!

[-] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world 54 points 10 months ago

I say, test both of them!

They should both be tested for drugs often, the working class is forced to undergo drug testing, why not the owner class as well, they are 'civil servants'; by multiple people and organizations, that would be fun to see differences in reports and writeups, even more if data is shown on what chemicals are in their system.

The claims arrive as Trump himself changes his tune on how well Biden may perform at the CNN debate. Having previously called Biden the "worst debater I have ever faced," Trump recently told the All-In Podcast that the president will be a "worthy debater" and that he does not want to "underestimate" Biden on Thursday.

"If President Biden needs to take performance enhancing drugs in order to participate in this week's debate, then it is imperative that he and his physician disclose that to the American people," Jackson said. "CNN's people leaked debate questions to Hillary Clinton in 2016," Grenell posted on X. Grenell was making reference to previous reports on how former chair of the Democratic National Committee Donna Brazile gave notice to Clinton's team about a debate question ahead of her 2016 debate with Trump.

"CNN's people leaked debate questions to Hillary Clinton in 2016," Grenell posted on X. Grenell was making reference to previous reports on how former chair of the Democratic National Committee Donna Brazile gave notice to Clinton's team about a debate question ahead of her 2016 debate with Trump.

Responding to the incident, Leavitt told Newsweek: "CNN cutting off my microphone for bringing up a debate moderator's history of anti-Trump lies just proves our point that President Trump will not be treated fairly in Thursday's debate.

[-] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago

Interesting question!

It seems to also show up in the first episode of American Horror Story: Freak Show [2].


After thinking a bit on it and reading about it, I would go with neither would go to jail.

It is better for a criminal to get away with murder than to have an innocent person go to jail for that crime.

It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer.

AKA Blackstone's ratio


There are some other possible solutions to the problem, however. You might throw both twins in prison but treat only the guilty one as if he were a convict. When the siblings were released, for example, the good twin would have all the rights of a normal citizen, while the evil twin would have lost the right to vote, be registered as a sex offender, etc. You might even compensate the good twin according to the relevant payout rules for wrongful convictions. (Those who were wrongly incarcerated for a federal crime can get up to $50,000 per year, or $100,000 if they were on death row.)

All of the above assumes that one twin is unambiguously guilty, and the other is unambiguously innocent. In real life, it’s hard to imagine such a clear-cut case. For example, a jury might be inclined to believe that the “good” twin acted as an accomplice, or perhaps an accessory, to the crime after the fact. This charge would apply if one sibling knew that the other had committed a crime—which seems likely under any circumstances—and that he intentionally provided assistance or comfort to his sibling rather than calling the police at the first opportunity. If the good twin were convicted of an accessory crime in federal court, he’d be subject to at most half the prison term appropriate to his evil brother. In some states, however, it’s legal to harbor a fugitive if that person happens to be your sibling.

One more way that a “good” twin might be convicted, even if he took no part in the actual committing of the crime: In some states, he might be found guilty of not stopping his brother. Although as a general rule, common-law tradition dictates that you can’t be held accountable for something you didn’t do, 10 states have so-called “duty to rescue” statutes. These require innocent bystanders to call the police or reasonably attempt to aid a victim in distress. (In four of these states, siblings of the offender are exempt from the law.) If one twin tried to stab someone, the other might be expected to grab his arm or drag both of them to the ground. The penalty for failing to rescue is usually a fine, though some jurisdictions allow for up to a year in prison.

[1] Source: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2010/01/a-siamese-twin-commits-murder-the-explainer-s-2009-question-of-the-year.html


I believe that within our Constitutional framework, the only thing to be done in this situation is to release the conjoined twins. Even if the jury sentenced the conjoined twins to death, the court would have to commute the sentence and release the twins. The guarantees of due process under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments prohibit punishing an innocent actor.

He asks the important question: “Which do we hold higher, the punishment of an innocent life or freeing a guilty one?”

[2] Source: https://www.bustle.com/articles/44313-how-are-conjoined-twins-punished-if-one-commits-murder-asking-for-bette-dot-on-ahs

[-] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world 130 points 1 year ago

"The media's the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that's power. Because they control the minds of the masses." - Malcolm X

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." - John F. Kennedy

"I and some colleagues came to the conclusion that as violence in this country was inevitable, it would be wrong and unrealistic for African leaders to continue preaching peace and non-violence at a time when the government met our peaceful demands with force. It was only when all else had failed, when all channels of peaceful protest had been barred to us, that the decision was made to embark on violent forms of political struggle." - Nelson Mandela

[-] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago

He also noted higher pay and easier promotions. “I had a 20% pay bump moving from Amazon to Microsoft for the same role and job responsibilities,” Nguyen wrote.

[-] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world 112 points 1 year ago

Generational labeling...

I see it as a way to divide the working class, same as the "lower class"/"middle class" and "unskilled labor"/"skilled labor".

[-] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

British traveler Phil Hardy, 41, was onboard Flight VS127 at Manchester Airport in the UK on Jan. 15 when he noticed the four missing fasteners during a safety briefing for passengers and decided to alert the cabin crew.

“I thought it was best to mention it to a flight attendant to be on the safe side.”

Neil Firth, the Airbus local chief wing engineer for A330, added that the affected panel was a secondary structure used to improve the aerodynamics of the plane.

Hardy said airline staff repeatedly reassured him there was no safety issue with the wing, but his fear was heightened given the recent ordeal in which an Alaska Airlines plane lost its door plug and a chunk of its fuselage flew off mid-flight.

“Each of these panels has 119 fasteners, so there was no impact to the structural integrity or load capability of the wing, and the aircraft was safe to operate,” he said.

“As a precautionary measure, the aircraft underwent an additional maintenance check, and the fasteners were replaced.”


Noteable comments:

The fasteners were not "replaced"....they were now properly included, as per the design. The public is not reassured if you cannot use precise or non-ambiguous language. It's better to state that it was an oversight or be specific: i.e. the design calls for a maximum of 119 fasteners, but allows for a minimum number (x), and thus it was allowed to fly. - tyrionsBeard

Great! So not only do you have to pay extra for a seat, checked bags but you have to check the wings before take off. That man should be credited for their flaw. - Mabel

[-] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago

The American Dream

But there’s a reason. There’s a reason. There’s a reason for this, there’s a reason education sucks, and it’s the same reason that it will never, ever, ever be fixed. It’s never gonna get any better. Don’t look for it. Be happy with what you got. Because the owners of this country don't want that. I'm talking about the real owners now, the real owners, the big wealthy business interests that control things and make all the important decisions. Forget the politicians. The politicians are put there to give you the idea that you have freedom of choice. You don't. You have no choice. You have owners. They own you. They own everything. They own all the important land. They own and control the corporations. They’ve long since bought and paid for the senate, the congress, the state houses, the city halls, they got the judges in their back pockets and they own all the big media companies so they control just about all of the news and information you get to hear. They got you by the balls. They spend billions of dollars every year lobbying, lobbying, to get what they want. Well, we know what they want. They want more for themselves and less for everybody else, but I'll tell you what they don’t want: They don’t want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They don’t want well informed, well educated people capable of critical thinking. They’re not interested in that. That doesn’t help them. Thats against their interests. Thats right. They don’t want people who are smart enough to sit around a kitchen table to figure out how badly they’re getting fucked by a system that threw them overboard 30 fucking years ago. They don’t want that. You know what they want? They want obedient workers. Obedient workers. People who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork, and just dumb enough to passively accept all these increasingly shittier jobs with the lower pay, the longer hours, the reduced benefits, the end of overtime and the vanishing pension that disappears the minute you go to collect it, and now they’re coming for your Social Security money. They want your retirement money. They want it back so they can give it to their criminal friends on Wall Street, and you know something? They’ll get it. They’ll get it all from you, sooner or later, 'cause they own this fucking place. It's a big club, and you ain’t in it. You and I are not in the big club. And by the way, it's the same big club they use to beat you over the head with all day long when they tell you what to believe. All day long beating you over the head in their media telling you what to believe, what to think and what to buy. The table is tilted folks. The game is rigged, and nobody seems to notice, nobody seems to care. Good honest hard-working people -- white collar, blue collar, it doesn’t matter what color shirt you have on -- good honest hard-working people continue -- these are people of modest means -- continue to elect these rich cocksuckers who don’t give a fuck about them. They don’t give a fuck about you. They don’t give a fuck about you. They don't care about you at all -- at all -- at all. And nobody seems to notice, nobody seems to care. That's what the owners count on; the fact that Americans will probably remain willfully ignorant of the big red, white and blue dick that's being jammed up their assholes everyday. Because the owners of this country know the truth: it's called the American Dream, because you have to be asleep to believe it. -George Carlin

[-] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago

According to the German newspaper Die Zeit, which broke the story, the prize will still be presented to Gessen, though “in a different setting”, and on Saturday instead of Friday. It remains unclear who will present it, what they will be presenting and whether Gessen and other invited guests still plan to attend.

In the paragraph the HBS draws attention to, Gessen wrote that “ghetto” would be “the more appropriate term” to describe Gaza, but the word “would have drawn fire for comparing the predicament of besieged Gazans to that of ghettoized Jews. It also would have given us the language to describe what is happening in Gaza now. The ghetto is being liquidated.”

On X/Twitter, they wrote that no German media representative had tried to contact them, despite the story being widely reported in German media on Thursday.

Supporters of Gessen, who is Jewish, and whose grandfather and great-grandfather were among family members murdered by the Nazis, have been quick to point out the irony of suspending a prize awarded in memory of Arendt, the German-born Jewish-American historian, philosopher and antitotalitarian political theorist who coined the phrase “the banality of evil”, in connection with the trial of leading Nazi Adolf Eichmann, which she covered as a journalist for the New Yorker.

In an open letter written with Albert Einstein and other Jewish intellectuals in 1948, Arendt had, Gessen pointed out, even compared the Israeli Freedom party to the Nazis after they used racially motivated violence against civilians.

“I am aware that this type of comparison, especially in Germany, is quickly seen as relativising the Holocaust. That’s why it’s so important to me that such a differentiated and intelligent thinker like Arendt didn’t shy away from this comparison,” Gessen told the newspaper.

Referring to people in Germany being wary of challenging “the logic of German memory policy” for fear of being accused of antisemitism, they added: “The problem is that criticism of Israel is often seen as antisemitic, which I think is the real antisemitic scandal. This overlooks the actual antisemitism.”

view more: next ›

jimmydoreisalefty

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF