58
Someone ought to ask Cynthia M. Masters a couple fucking questions.
He finally defeated this evil man... after he rose to being the fucking pope, led the church for 12 years, and died at a ripe 88 years old...
Idk, I feel like God didn't do much at all. But if he's striking down evil, I'd get to painting your door in sheep's blood real quick, Marge.
First of all, fuck you, figure it out. Second of all, if that were the case, that means you are literally sentencing people to life imprisonment without chance of parole with absolutely no due process at all. That goes even beyond what the (unconstitutional) Alien Enemies Act allows. Far beyond. For the love of God, make this shit stop.
I can't wait until Trump pisses off the world enough that they fight back and he is eventually tried for his crimes against humanity. I can't wait to shit on your grave you evil fuck.
Admission that the only thing that would keep him in the bounds of his actual legal authority is the threat of criminal charges for misusing it.
Option 3 means that the Javascript standards team dies either way, right? Number 3. No hesitation.
Dude went to see Barbie a second time to seethe about feminism. Entirely missed Openheimer. "Too long, too sciency."
And legalizing marriage to minors. And outlawing comprehensive sexual education.
People getting covid vaccines and wearing face masks were living in fear. Man standing behind bullet proof glass? Brave. Strong. Manly.
Who ever thought punk was not progressive? At minimum it was blatantly anti-authoritarian and counter to the conservative culture in Thatcher's UK and Reagan's US. Why would anyone be shocked to find out that it was also pro-choice, feminist, and anti-discriminatory?
Listen, strange women lyin' in ponds distributin' swords is no basis for a system of government.
Let it be know that if you take office while actively committing fraud, embezzlement, and lying through your teeth about nearly every single detail of your life and accomplishments, the rest of Congress will ONLY let that slide for 11 months! You've been warned!
view more: next ›
kryptonianCodeMonkey
joined 2 years ago
Misuse of the word "racist" aside, if you're generalizing about the inherent qualities of the Russian people, that's still bigotry. If you're calling out negative aspects of their laws, government, or culture, that's not bigotry, that's constructive criticism. If you're pointing out the mistakes of their history that's education to bring awareness and hoodlums prevent recurrence. If you're calling all speech that is negative in any way about Russia "russophobia", or "racism", regardless of the nature of that speech, then you're a Russian apologist and stooge.
It's pretty simple: speech that displays mistrust, dislike, or hate for the inherent traits of a people is bigotry. Speech that displays mistrust, dislike, or hate for ideals and actions is just disagreement/politics.