[-] fodor@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 days ago

You mean when. When is the question.

[-] fodor@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

This is not the story of a person with no backups. It's the story of a person with partial backups.

Be careful before you blame the victim, and if you're going to do so anyway, at least be accurate about it.

[-] fodor@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 days ago

Your rant got it wrong in the first paragraph. People can socialize with or without hitting on others. Ah well, better luck next time!

[-] fodor@lemmy.zip 7 points 6 days ago

How to say you are not a cat owner without saying you are not a cat owner.

[-] fodor@lemmy.zip 26 points 3 weeks ago

At many companies you talk to more than one person in a single visit, so when that person writes about interviews, the plural, it's likely that they're planning to have you speak with multiple people.

Everything depends on the company, but if you're going in for a multi-hour session, you're probably on the short list of candidates. So you should feel good about where you are, but you don't have the job yet.

[-] fodor@lemmy.zip 42 points 3 weeks ago

Alligator Auschwitz. It's a death camp, or will soon be.

[-] fodor@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 month ago

Your unhoused numbers are wrong. Those are the official "sleeping on the streets" numbers, which is not the same thing. First because they're official, and therefore almost certainly undercounting, and second because they exclude all of the situations where people don't have houses but are kinda not exactly in a cardboard box.

[-] fodor@lemmy.zip 34 points 1 month ago

Not exactly. The mass pig expansion program across the country in the 1990s was spearheaded by Bill Clinton. The pro pig Dems are just as actively racist and murderous as the pro pig Reps.

[-] fodor@lemmy.zip 56 points 1 month ago

So ... Pay the Americans more. That is why they are leaving, my farming friends. It really is that simple.

[-] fodor@lemmy.zip 31 points 1 month ago

How cool! This is one great point of FOSS.

[-] fodor@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 month ago

I think you're trying to make a pretty s***** implication. Remember that this is a situation where the parents got charged with a crime for being reckless. Are you insinuating that the parents knew that their 7 year old child was likely to jump out into the street, and that perhaps the child had a history of doing so, and that the parents nevertheless allowed the child to walk home from the store? It sounds like that's what you're claiming.

[-] fodor@lemmy.zip 27 points 2 months ago

You can buy loyalty. Give someone a high paying 3-year contract and they'll probably work to the end of it. But of course HR doesn't want to hear that.

view more: next ›

fodor

joined 2 months ago