Well yeah, you missed that it was a woman, not a man.

Option 1: Move to an instance that doesn't federate with them, like lemmy.cafe.

Option 2: Go to the settings page on the website, and block the instance. This will stop you from seeing comms on that instance, but you will still see comments and posts by their users in other comms.

Option 3: Client-specific. If you're using another client besides the default website, most of them have some way to block and hide all users from an instance as well, usually somewhere in the settings.

[-] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I support the posting of archived links, but it doesn't work if you haven't actually archived the page in question yet :P

Regarding the article itself, I'm not the best at parsing science-speak, but it doesn't look like they found any major repercussions? Somebody correct me if I misunderstood.

There's a lot of clueless users though, it'd be good to have them join the rest of us outside that shithole

It definitely does.

[-] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Mostly that blocking and defederation aren't the same thing. Blocking only stops the comms on that instance from showing up in your feed. It's entirely unrelated to the federation / activitypub mechanic. It's effectively like you turning on a local filter in your client, and only filters communities.

12

4

Running bamboo is notoriously fast spreading and difficult to remove. What keeps its population balanced in the wild, and prevents it from crowding out the competition? I tried googling, but was inundated with gardening advice, horror stories, and assault / offensive gardening (some of the latter two presumably covering the same incident from both sides). My google-fu failed, I couldn't really find any info about natural population controls of running bamboo in the thicket of tall tales and gardening advice.

17
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works to c/longreads@sh.itjust.works
163
88
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works to c/boardgames@sopuli.xyz

To be clear: They are joining an existing lawsuit for businesses that are being impacted by the tariffs

19

It's been a while since I remembered to post this! I'm so bad at this stuff 😖

15
43
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works to c/Norway@sopuli.xyz
42

cross-posted from: https://rss.ponder.cat/post/157533

Pile of various classic board games including Monopoly, Scrabble, and Battleship on shelves at a cafe, Bondadoso Coffee, Walnut Creek, California, November 13, 2023.

Less than two weeks after the Trump administration’s announcement of historically high tariffs on virtually all goods imported into the United States, the board game industry appears set for an unexpected reckoning. An ad hoc industry survey conducted by Cardboard Edison reveals that nearly a quarter of publishers polled will simply stop making board games. A majority believe that prices for board games that do get published will go up, and that the size and complexity of those games will go down. It’s a dismal state of affairs for what was once a blossoming part of the larger tabletop games industry, one that has for decades generated hundreds of millions of dollars for the United States economy.

Cardboard Edison is a small publisher best known for its annual game design awards. Its survey, conducted April 9-11, collected responses from 62 publishers. The company claims that “about 90%” of respondents said they expect consumer prices on board games will go up because of tariffs, and “about two-thirds” of publishers said print runs for those games will be smaller. 62% of publishers said they plan to sign fewer new games to their catalogs, meaning fewer opportunities for tabletop designers who traditionally operate as independent contractors. Most tragically, the group says 23% — nearly a quarter — of respondents said they’ll just stop making board games altogether.

The biggest red flag in the survey, however, is that those publishers who want to try and stay in the board game business are actively seeking ways to cut distributors and retailers out of the equation. As margins fall due to the cost of tariffs, which are a tax, selling games at retail using traditional logistics simply won’t be an option. Brick and mortar stores, including thousands of independent local game stores all around the country, likely won’t have as many board games to put on their shelves going forward.


From Polygon via this RSS feed

90
Summer in Norway (sopuli.xyz)
273
13
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works to c/voyagerapp@lemmy.world

About 5 - 10 % of images on my feed don't load, but show this error. Any idea what's going on? On android.

[-] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 105 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

As several people have mentioned, it's for lights. The reason is, in Norway any electrical work needs to be done or certified by a licensed electrician. Since light fixtures are a fairly commonly replaced item, the current trend is for ceiling mount points to come with a nearby electrical plug so you can switch out a light fixture without shelling out for an electrician. These power outlets are connected to a switch elsewhere so you can flick the lights on and off like normal.

Visit !norway@sopuli.xyz for all your Norwegian and reindeer trivia 😁

[-] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 278 points 4 months ago

Reported by a worker at McD. Wtf, they're the group that would benefit the most from a change in the healthcare system. Idiot.

[-] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 82 points 5 months ago

Can't blame them, they just gained a new preexisting condition

[-] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 87 points 5 months ago

My inbox is quite a ride. I keep seeing insults in it and then realise it's not meant for me

[-] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 82 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Warning: Unpopular opinion coming up

This is a ridiculous metric. They measure carbon emissions not just by what the billionaires are consuming, but by what their investments (businesses, factories, etc) are producing. This is akin to the world blaming China for their grossly inflated per capita emissions, while conveniently ignoring that it's actually being consumed by other countries and it's just shifting numbers around.

There are plenty of legit reasons to hate billionaires, there's really no need to be making up new questionable ones that can be torn apart.

[-] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 81 points 8 months ago

They summarised the history of Tumblr, but failed to mention how they lost 3 quarters of their users by banning porn?

view more: next ›

AwesomeLowlander

joined 10 months ago
MODERATOR OF