80
submitted 1 month ago by j_roby@slrpnk.net to c/news@lemmy.world

The family said the masked men did not identify themselves and did not provide any judicial warrants. The DHS did not say whether the agents had warrants.

The bullet holes on the side of the truck as well as shattered windows confirmed the altercation Saturday morning.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 month ago

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said when officers attempted a vehicle stop in the area of Acacia Avenue and Baseline Street Saturday morning, people inside the truck refused to come out then "tried to run them down."

Prove it. Fucking murderous cunts.

[-] j_roby@slrpnk.net 27 points 1 month ago

Following the altercation, dozens of community members as well as federal agents with the Homeland Security Investigations vests gathered outside the home.

At least one person was arrested for assaulting a federal officer, San Bernardino police said.

But the person was set free "despite refusing to comply and wounding officers," the DHS said.

It really does sound like they're just making shit up as they go. Would they really set an arrestee free after "assaulting and wounding" one of theirs? I call bull shit.

Considering that the DHS is regularly fabricating charges post hoc when their kidnapping squad needs it, there must have been no credible evidence of this claim. But apparently that's still not enough to stop them from lying about it to the press.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 3 points 1 month ago

An accusation from the fascists is evidence enough. There must have been credible evidence of the claim's falsity.

[-] Kirp123@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I mean they have made shit up when there was literal video proof of the contrary before. Like they claimed that an 80 year old senator body slammed them. Or when they arrested Alex Padilla. It's obvious they always make shit up.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Tried? Well, better luck next time.

[-] j_roby@slrpnk.net 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Statement from Inland Coalition for Immigrant Justice

Alt text

BORDER PATROL FIRES ON CIVILIAN VEHICLE, STAGES WARRANTLESS OPERATION At approximately 8:40am, immigration agents stopped a vehicle, broke the driver and passenger windows, and fired three times while people were inside. The individual returned home after it became clear agents had no warrant. In fear, the family called SBPD for help. Instead of intervening, SBPD did little to assist. By 9:30am, armed ICE and HSI agents, joined by SBPD, surrounded the home. Despite never presenting a warrant, they remained until 3:45pm, pressuring the individual to come outside. During the incident, two community members were detained using unnecessary force, including one for speaking out. This was a clear abuse of power. Firing at civilians, harassing families without cause, and targeting community voices must stop. We demand full accountability and transparency from SBPD and DHS. We thank all who showed up to support the family. Because of that collective pressure, ICE left. This is not an isolated incident it is part of a larger, unacceptable pattern.

[-] Chozo@fedia.io 9 points 1 month ago

"(It's) another terrible example of California's pro-sanctuary policies in action that shield criminals instead of protecting communities," the federal agency added.

The only criminals I see in this story are the masked men shooting at civilians.

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2025
80 points (98.8% liked)

News

32577 readers
31 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS