8
submitted 1 month ago by Stamau123@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A number of party leaders are frustrated that Hogg, who has a leadership position in the party, is pushing primaries against some incumbents in deep-blue seats.

Democratic party leaders Thursday morning admonished officers to not take sides in primaries, addressing a situation involving activist and Democratic National Committee vice chair David Hogg.

"Let me be unequivocal. No DNC officer should ever attempt to influence the outcome of a primary election, whether on behalf of an incumbent or a challenger," DNC Chair Ken Martin said in a press call. "Voters should decide who our primary nominees are, not DNC leadership. Our role is to serve as stewards of a fair, open and trusted process, not to tilt the scales."'

As of now, however, the DNC does not have the power to remove Hogg if he refuses to stand down on funding primary challenges through a separate PAC — unless the body changes its rules, a senior DNC official told NBC News.

“Under the present bylaws, there is no action that can be taken against David Hogg without changing to the bylaws to extend that policy of neutrality to all primaries," DNC Finance Chair Chris Korge told NBC News. "There is no codified, legal way to remove an officer for doing what David Hogg has done because it only extends to the presidential race. "

Korge said that, as of now, the situation is to be addressed at a future meeting, likely in August.

Korge said he believed it was imperative for the body to formally change its bylaws because the party division the Hogg situation has caused harkens to an old ghost Democrats don't want to revisit.

“It smells like 2016, when progressives said the DNC had it in the bag for Hillary Clinton," Korge said, referencing angst in the party that the DNC had its thumb on the scale to block Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., from the presidential nomination. "No party official, no officer of the DNC, should do anything that would result in the division that was created by the perception that existed back in 2016."

On Thursday, Martin went on to say he had spoken to Hogg about what he perceived as a conflict but he did not expound on whether he gave him an ultimatum.

"I understand what he's trying to do," Martin continued in the press call. "As I've said to him, 'If you want to challenge incumbents, you're more than free to do that. But just not as an officer of the DNC, because our job is to be a neutral arbiter. We can't be both the referee and also the player at the same time. You have to make a decision.'"

In pushing back on Thursday, Hogg cited Trump's power clashes with institutions in saying the party needed to take more aggressive actions. He added that he had not violated any DNC bylaws.

"They’re trying to change the rules because I'm not currently breaking them. As we’re seeing law firms, tech companies, and so many others bowing to Trump, we all must use whatever position of power we have to fight back. And that’s exactly what I'm doing," Hogg said in a statement.

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

“Let me be unequivocal. No DNC officer should ever attempt to influence the outcome of a primary election, whether on behalf of an incumbent or a challenger,” DNC Chair Ken Martin said in a press call.

This is a position the DNC has acted contrary to for decades, and only decided they conveniently held when someone wanted to primary centrists. Ken Martin is not a departure from the centrist wing of the party's decades of self-serving bad faith; he is a continuation and possibly an acceleration of it.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Note that the text OP posted above is NOT the whole article!!
IDK why that isn't made clear?

Since last week, Hogg has appeared on just about every cable news show and digital outlet, advocating for a party reset of sorts — not just because it lost the White House to Donald Trump, but also because, he said, it lost faith among voters.

David Hogg is right IMO, the party needs a reset, and the platform needs a reset. For one: Calling themselves the Democratic party, they really should work more to improve democracy in USA! As it is they are not really democrats any more than people calling themselves pro life when in fact they aren't at all pro life. What they are is against abortion rights.

Likewise the Democrats have helped maintain the status quo, in a dysfunctional flawed democratic system.

[-] Stamau123@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

IDK why that isn’t made clear?

its a community rule not to post the whole article, so I posted some of it

[-] ctkatz@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago

i agree with hogg that the party needs a reset, but the vice chair of the party should not be the one making that comment because it gives all appearances that the party will be picking and choosing the primary candidates and throwing their weight behind their preferred candidate. that's going to lead to party fractures and a lot of hard feelings. you want to ensure more republicans winning easier than they should on the local level? have the party pick the candidate instead of the people in the district.

that's why i am very glad the chair has pretty much laid down the law. the party leadership (save one) is committed to electing democrats wherever they are whoever they are. one person in leadership is committed to electing specific democrats to office.

which if you think about it is a colossal failure. he's down in florida. he's had ample opportunity to elect his chosen democrats in florida with his pac. how successful were his candidates? and you've got people who see that (lack of) success he had in florida and say, "yeah, let's take that plan and apply it nationwide, even if the better democrat for an area isn't someone that hogg prefers."

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

i agree with hogg that the party needs a reset, but the vice chair of the party should not be the one making that comment because it gives all appearances that the party will be picking and choosing the primary candidates and throwing their weight behind their preferred candidate.

It's neat how this hasn't been a concern until just now.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

the party leadership (save one) is committed to electing democrats wherever they are whoever they are

Maybe they shouldn't commit to democrats that continuously vote with the Republicans?
I don't see why there shouldn't be standards.

[-] KbSez@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago

such bullsh!t - Hogg sees they aren't doing their jobs, they aren't fighting and they need to go. Good for him.

This is the problem, these establishment Democrats aren't supporting the people who are willing to fight, they want to write strongly worded letters and consider legislation... those days are gone.

Jefferies needs to be thrown out, Schumer needs to step back or walk away.

I really thought Martin would be good for the party but I'm not seeing it

[-] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Nothing surprising here but it is somewhat notable that the DNC response to activists whipping up enthusiasm and engagement among younger voters is to change the bylaws in order to stop them. Real pieces of shit, they are. Proven time and time again.

[-] commitme@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Making reform impossible is a very dangerous game.

[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Woah, there, enthusiasm?! Listen, buddy, we prefer our voters begrudged.

[-] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

FUCK the DNC. They helped put us in this mess.

[-] mienshao@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

As a liberal who donated literally hundreds of dollars last year to ActBlue thinking I was saving democracy, Democrats have completely lost me. I’m done. After a loss as bad as 2024, how those Democratic leaders all stay in their positions is beyond me. Schumer, Jeffries, the entire DNC should’ve been fired and replaced. They are losers who made us lose to a fucking moronic orange rapist. And the fact that they’re STILL lying about putting the thumb on Clinton’s scale over Bernie’s in 2016 is as dishonest as it is infuriating. Fuck the Democratic party forever.

(For the record, will continue voting blue because the most corrupt democrat is better than the nicest magat, but we need a new party on the Left STAT)

[-] meyotch@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 month ago

We get the left party by splitting the Democratic Party. The Republicans are dead-old-white-men-walking, they will implode. I’m Team Hogg on this one

[-] baronvonj@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

We get the left party by splitting the Democratic Party

I’m Team Hogg on this one

I'm a bit confused by the wording here. When you say "split" I hear making a whole new party? But David Hogg is a vice chair of the Democratic Party, so being on his team implies not third party. Could you clarify?

[-] meyotch@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 month ago

Political parties can split. Parties can die.

an example from US history

Major upheavals in parties are inevitable.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 month ago

Or we could just take it over, like what Hogg is actually trying to do. Parties shift focus much more easily than they die.

[-] BalderSion@real.lemmy.fan 0 points 1 month ago

Indeed. It feels like a lot of historical context is missing in Lemmy political discussions. The Democratic party was the party of FDR, JFK, and LBJ. The Democratic Leadership Council took over the party after the left candidates failed to deliver election successes, but even then, the DLC had to do the work to take the party leadership positions, build a funding network, and win elections. Before that FDR had to wrestle party control from the the Dixiecrats.

Hopefully Hogg and allies will be successful in reforming the party once again.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 0 points 1 month ago

the DLC had to do the work to take the party leadership positions, build a funding network, and win elections.

The question is: Will the DNC let you do that or will they sink with the whole damn ship? Because they have the tools (mostly money and connections, but also control of the party, immense social pressure and gaslighting) to stop you, dilute your final program or at the very least make your life hell every step of the way and significantly delay your planned takeover. Crucially, this is all happening and will keep happening during a time of active fascism when prompt and decisive action is needed, not compromise with Wall Street.

[-] BalderSion@real.lemmy.fan 1 points 1 month ago

I mean, obviously I don't know how the internals of how the party works from first hand experience. That said I seriously don't think we should build them up into a bete noir. Every party is in the business of winning. The party went to the center because Nixon walloped McGovern, and Reagan crushed both his elections. Also, the DLC found a way to fund the party after labor support waned for a variety of reasons.

Did the party impede Sanders' primary campaign against Hillary? It's been acknowledged that they did. Of course he's been a career independent, and not a party member for one thing. Probably more importantly, party leadership still doesn't think going to the left will win nationally. Of course we choose our candidates through a primary process, but like it or not, the party's job is to win elections, and it's not outside the party's mandate to support candidates who they think will win.

But party leadership isn't a monolith, and it isn't a conspiracy. It is a group of people trying to make sense of things and find a way to succeed. Of course the old guard is resisting change because they still think they've got the recipe for success. Time will tell how it plays out. It's going to be hard work, and as party voters our ability to influence change in the party has been diluted by a bunch of consultants that are telling the old guard what they want to hear, and only face a reckoning every two years. I imagine, in the face of fascistic tendencies in the rightwing party, moderation and compromise will be even less attractive, even to a center left party. We've got to make our voice heard, and when we get a crack, we've got to deliver wins.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

You've somehow managed to say all this without actually responding to any of my points. And just for the record, I don't give a shit why they wrecked Bernie's presidential runs or why they keep suppressing the left; it only matters that they do and they're not gonna stop doing it. I mean you said it; the old guard still thinks they have the recipe for success in the face of all evidence to the contrary.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

How dare he rock the boat when the current bunch are doing so well.

Hey man, we gotta be patient, the old guard is really busy doing absolutely nothing

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 1 month ago

Oh c'mon! Insider trading, setting up offshore accounts and shell companies is work!

[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

That's exactly the plan. Schumer has said out loud that the plan is to just let the republicans off the leash, let them sink their own poll numbers and hope they teach the voters a lesson.

That lesson, of course, being that you can put a Democrat in office to do nothing, or you can put a Republican in office and the democrats will still do nothing. These fossilized assholes need a solid kick in the pants. I would like to wish Schumer and his ilk a very merry get fucking lost.

[-] DougHolland@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Rebuke away, ya dumb fuck Dems. What the young Mr Hogg is attempting — funding primary challengers to the most empty-suit Democrats — might be futile, might not, but you gotta respect the effort.

"Wake up, wake up," he shouts at the corpse of the Democratic Party, which will probably wake up only long enough to smack him away, and then go back to sleep.

Lmao and they can’t get rid of him, I fucking LOVE that.

Sucks to suck, status-quo old-guard fucksticks.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

If they even fucking dare try its the very last time an entire generation votes D.

[-] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

Yeah, like if they can't reform to represent their voters then we're gonna have to throw the whole party out. Not really the type of play I want to have to make in the current situation though.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

What do they say? The best time to start working out was 10 years ago.

The second best time to start is now.

[-] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

The outrage is telling. Hogg is making an effort to introduce fresh faces and ideas at the primary level. This gives Democrats a chance to choose which ideas they want to go into play in congress. That is all.

If those voters are happy with what they currently have, the incumbent is safe. If not, those new ideas go up against opposing ideas. If a plurality like those ideas, they get to see them play out in congress. The only risk here is that they lose the seat.

Since at the moment, he's doing this in reliably blue districts, the risk is lower than elsewhere. This is a recipe for real change in the Democratic party for the better.

The only reason to fight against it so hard (that I see) is the protection of individuals' comfort at the expense of the welfare of our nation. It's evidence of moral rot in the the party that is threatened by true representation of the citizens' needs.

I support Hogg's efforts - as long as he does not have the morality of "boss Hogg". (For the kids out there who have no idea of what i mean, find and watch a season of The Dukes Of Hazzard.)

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

the donors control both the gop and dem , they are afriad they cant control the likes of future aoc, and BERNIES

[-] lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Voters should decide who our primary nominees are, not DNC leadership.

Tell that to Sanders, Clinton, and Harris... That's just recent memory...

🙄 🤡 🤦‍♀️

[-] electricyarn@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

They straight up told us who the nominee would be against Trump. What a fucking joke. "Democracy is in peril so we have to suspend democracy.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Thus marking the greatest opposition democrats have mustered against anything this year.

this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2025
8 points (100.0% liked)

News

30249 readers
2041 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS