If I could steal a car by downloading it over the internet without depriving the original owner of it and with similarly low risk of getting caught/prosecuted for it I would absolutely steal a car. I wouldn't steal a font tho, that's just beyond the pale. :P
My eighty year-old parents have "borrowed" my car for a year.
I, too, would download one if I could.
And so would they I suppose. It crosses generations!
Sligthly off topic but I think this actually may be some kind of Mandela effect, because I think a large number of people actually think the commercial said 'You wouldn't download a car' because of all the memes but it actually said 'You wouldn't steal a car'
I love our spiderman meme culture where everyone is pointing their fingers at each other accusing them of stealing their idea/song/art/etc.
I can never understand how people carry so much water for corporations who could care less about them. We are supposed to rearrange our entire society around their revenue streams.
yeah. it's mind blowing to me how the Internet was convinced to give up its a culture of piracy and privateering and become sycophants for corporate protection of IP under they imaginary impression that they are "protecting artists".
There were industry executives and think tanks litterally quoted (in the 2000s) for saying that their job was to effectively convince people that piracy "hurt the artist", that this was the way to stop piracy: convince people they were hurting artists by piracy.
Turns out, almost no artists except the most extraordinarily successful make any money off copyright or IP. They mostly make their money the way they've always made their money: ticket sales, merch sales, performances, etc.
Yo, that is my sequence of 0's and 1's is how ridiculous it all is in the digital era. Not to mention I have to pay for and maintain the hardware to even access the content.
I also have a hard time understanding the self imposed artificial scarcity we live with. Copying work/art/ideas/science is literally the point of humanity. We are truly living in a perverse time where corporations steal our culture and spoon feed it back to us for profit and control.
You should watch this from the "don't be evil days" days of google.: https://youtu.be/mhBpI13dxkI
Copyright isn't, and never has been, about "protecting the artist".
It was, and is, and has always been, about controlling the means of distribution.
Interestingly, if you look into the lecturerer of that video, they are very active on mastadon.
Watching it now, I am pretty sure I know most the history but there is always more to learn. Thanks!
The central takeaway is a critical examination of copyright's history and its current relevance in the digital age. The speaker promotes a shift in the conversation towards a model of creativity and distribution decoupled from traditional copyright, emphasizing that copyright was historically designed to protect distribution channels rather than support artists. He argues that the internet's capabilities render those mechanisms obsolete and calls for a new understanding of creativity, free from the constraints of the current copyright system. Ultimately, the speaker urges the audience to question the widely held beliefs about copyright and to support the free flow of information. The youtube video is summarized by transcriptly
I'm just waiting to be able to download a house.
Didn't they already get busted for not licensing the music?
I haven’t been this shocked since I found out the original McGruff voice actor was arrested with a bunch of guns and weed plants
The thing about the parasitic class is that they are not obligated to be logically congruent... They are always right.
These standards only apply to the wage slave class.
This ad probably made more people aware of how easy it is to pirate movies and introduced the idea of doing that than it ever deterred people from pirating. I see the advertisement in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmZm8vNHBSU
Funny, but fonts can't be copyrighted.
They say the ad used XBand Rough, an "illegal clone".
If you redraw an entire font, pixel for pixel, manually, it is not an illegal clone. This happens all the time. The creators of the ad just used a copy that was free.
So ironic, yes, illegal, no.
The font of Theseus!
Typefaces cannot be protected by copyright in the US, but by some stupid interpretation, fonts are software, which is protected. Really annoying how tech-illiterate judges can screw up something this obvious. Even if the technical implementation of a font was something that should be protected IP, it should be under patent law, not copyright.
There's no rational reason typefaces shouldn't enjoy protection.
pixel for pixel
I don't think it was a bitmap font.
If you copy a font, bitmap or not, you're doing it as a pixel map on a pixelated monitor.
most fonts nowadays are vector based, so they aren’t really created with pixels :)
Vector is still pixel maps. Open an SVG in a text editor 😉
You wouldn't download a bear
I'd rather download a bear than download a strange man, that's for sure.
Didn't the commercial use unlicensed music too? I feel like I remember there being a lawsuit for unpaid royalties or something.
Edit: Yup!
Edit 2: I'm an idiot who didn't fully read what I posted.
Edit: Yup!
Your link claims the exact opposite.
Yeah. I didn't fully read the article lol. Thats on me.
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
