596
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago

They’re so desperate to make their store front a thing 😂

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It is hilarious.

Epic tried getting users by giving them free games. But that didn't translate to increased sales. And now they are trying to woo developers to abandon Steam, hoping that way customers will be forced to buy from Epic.

They don't understand that developers are on Steam because customers are there. And what does a customer get when they use Epic over Steam?

[-] NecroticEuphoria@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 week ago

I just deny the existence of any game that is an Epic Games exclusive title.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] systemglitch@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

So true. All they have to do is WAY FUCKING MORE THAN THEY ARE WILLING TO.

Fuck Epic

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 40 points 1 week ago

Yeah yeah, what about making the EGS program not suck for customers? An overglorified browser running on top of unreal engine, no user reviews for games...

load more comments (1 replies)

Because they have to, because their store is based in bribing developers for artificial exclusivity in an attempt to hurt Valve for proving that Pig Swiney was a moron a decade ago when he said PC gaming was dead.

This is all a vain attempt by a man child to get back at Gabe, and it’s abso fucking lutely a hilarious delight what an abject failure it all is.

Garbage store with no customer services struggles and burns money, because that’s what’s lazy customer fucking cash grabs should do - burn. Fuck epic, fuck Swiney, and fuck you if you defend them.

load more comments (3 replies)

Unreal Engine could've got us, like, Unreal Tournament. It almost did, in fact, it a little.

Die in eternal fire Epic

[-] MudMan@fedia.io 27 points 1 week ago

That's pretty cool, actually. Sorely needed in the current economic climate. Good for them.

I wish their software and platform were a lot better to go along with this, but in isolation this is great.

[-] Gurei@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 week ago

How many layoffs does that take? /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Fortnite kids will sustain them. Gotta darken those patterns just a little...

[-] glitchdx@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

100% of $0 is still $0.

I'll spend my money on platforms that have proven to respect their customers.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] MSids@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

I can't wait to get more games on my Epic deck, oh wait it was Valve who pioneered an incredible platform that can play AAA games on a handheld running Linux and made compatibility a reality for thousands of games.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago

... and it still won't dent Steam's de-facto monopoly.

[-] Rusty@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 week ago

I would rather buy a game on steam, or better yet on gog, than giving my money to a company that is trying to make store exclusive games a thing.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] Vespair@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Good for them, but until EGS starts being more pro- consumer, I'm not spending a cent there

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] B0NK3RS@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

This is great and it's not like they have shit revenue splits anyway as last I checked it was 88/12 which is by far the best around.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Is this an apology for the bad performance issues of UE5?

[-] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago

So what does Steam's revenue share look like in comparison?

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago

Steam takes 30% at first, and there is a discount after tens of millions of dollars in sales.

Steam offers a ton of benefits for game companies through steam, such as the Friends list, reviews, having a way to show live play from the store page, and a bunch of other things. There is a reason that everyone is flocking to steam, and that 30% cut isn't keeping anyone away.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

I've not used Epic games store much at all but I could see this leading to a proliferation of garbage on their service if they take the Steam approach of just letting anyone publish on there. This would essentially be an incentive to publish asset flip shovelware on Epic instead of Steam because "devs" get a bigger cut.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 week ago

At least Valve takes some of the money that they make from Steam and use it for Steam. You cant run an entire gaming platform based on developers alone, you also need to make it at least somewhat bearable for consumers.

[-] qarbone@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

How are they affording this? It can't be a sustainable model, right?

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

Fortnite, and it's not. The store loses them hundreds of millions of dollars per year.

[-] qarbone@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's the kind of competition I want. Not a plucky newcomer with fresh ideas, but an industry titan able to burn more money than some companies ever see in an attempt to undercut the competition. They surely aren't factoring this as a deficit to recoup when they pull a massive reversal after securing market dominance. That's never happened in the history of capitalism.

Epic can huff my huffables.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 week ago

Here's the details on the financials

https://newsletter.gamediscover.co/p/exclusive-the-numbers-behind-epics

They'd been paying a fortune for other ways to get more titles which never panned out. Steam said fuck the little guys so they're trying to capitalize on that right now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] idriss@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago

It s a good start ngl.

What about taking a different route altogether and not be greedy? what about charging a flat fee (your costs plus some profits to run the infrastructure like yearly or monthly). What about not being evil?

There is a huge business opportunity IMO to do just that. Have a store, charge a flat fee, add whatever percentage wire transfers take (1-3%). You make money, you out-compete everyone and you are the good guy.

[-] derpgon@programming.dev 15 points 1 week ago

That would require having a platform worth something. Currently, they sank millions into the community - but in the wrong way. The client still lacks basic features and yet they spend money to buy exclusivity.

Fuck them, they don't deserve shit - praise or money.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
596 points (96.3% liked)

Games

18943 readers
169 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS