60
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Nougat@fedia.io 14 points 1 week ago

They just want trans people to die, not to die for their country.

[-] brendansimms@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago
[-] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

magats be like:

  • Ban trans people
  • Ban gay/lesbian people
  • Ban non-whites
  • Ban women
  • Ban non christians

In 2026: Rebel army is made of Non-Christians, People of Colour, Women, LGBT people.

Also magats: surprised pikachu face

You forgot a few more people

  • Catholics
  • Protestants who dont follow the church of Trump
  • Neurodivergant people
  • Class conscious workers
  • Immigrants
  • Non anglo-saxons
  • Non Republicans
  • Republicans that follow any faction other than Trumpism
[-] uuldika@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

JD Vance is Catholic. he converted right around the time his political ambitions deepend. Leonard Leo (Federalist Society president) is Catholic, as are most of FedSoc leadership. Roberts, Barrett and Kavanaugh are Catholic.

the deep power in the RNC is very conservative Catholic.

[-] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

When I say Catholic I mean genuenly Catholic, aka people who follow the pope over Orange Jesus. Example:

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago

Amy Coney Barrett is super fucking Catholic... Though I guess many of them are regretting that appointment given how she's ruled in Trump's cases recently

[-] JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

Trump’s probably going to go after their tax-exempt status, now.

Like the nazis before them the fascists of America do not like real Catholics or Protestants that acturally belive in god

[-] ours@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

But he killed the Pope with his cringe aura.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think you meant deepened… depends is what Trump wears..

Nothing against senile incontinence, but it’s not something our president should have

[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Thats covered in "nonwhite" (let's be honest though white is a meaningless word)

[-] System_below@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 1 week ago

Non anglo-saxons

So everyone? Ain't any Anglo Saxon around since that little old conquest of 1066

Kinda like how Trumps definitions of sex basically turned eveyone agender I expect them to accidentally ban eveyone from the military and then not follow their own rules

[-] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago

Fuck it.

Let's ban all the liberals and queers and women and fems and educated, too. Then let's get a draft going and set no minimum or maximum age. Let's start making all our own equipment and you know let's just not give them anything. Then let's get into a war with China and not use drones or ai or tanks. Ohh noooooo, all the shitty people diiieedd. Sorry China, we take it back. Yeah, all those rules we changed, it didn't work out. Oh well. NO MAGATS. VOTING TIME.

[-] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Making easier to dodge the draft.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago

Careful though, you might dodge yourself right into a prison in El Salvador.

[-] vrojak@feddit.org 11 points 1 week ago

When there are fewer LGBT people in the military, then there will also be less resistance from within when the military is used to oppress that very same group. I suspect that might be a reason for the ban. Also I guess there'd be less chance for a coup, but I don't know how likely that is to begin with.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

The military is all about indoctrination which is the polite word for "brainwashing". Our trans friends in the armed forces are just as unlikely to stop stomping on necks as anyone else.

Nah, this is just general hate toward the Ts (expect the Ls, Bs, Gs, Qs, and +s to follow).

[-] ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago

With the enrollment going down, banning women and now this, they really don’t want a military.

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

The more people banned from the US military the better.

[-] Nalivai@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Unfortunately they made it so for a lot of people it's the only available way to escape poverty

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago
[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Make the US military weak again.

[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

This will turn into good news once they start the draft

[-] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Hopefully they won't already be in camps.

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

its simple, everyone can say they are trans to avoid the draft.

[-] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -4 points 1 week ago

"An unprecedented degree of animus towards transgender people animates and permeates the ban: it is based on the shocking proposition that transgender people do not exist," the lawyers wrote.

Someone needs to hire new lawyers cause that’s not even being discussed.

[-] randamumaki@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

You are either missing the point or are willfully obtuse.

this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
60 points (98.4% liked)

News

29377 readers
2643 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS