122
submitted 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) by abobla@lemm.ee to c/linux@lemmy.ml
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 2 points 19 minutes ago

I'm enjoying the dedication to great defaults, by the Gnome team.

[-] muusemuuse@lemm.ee 12 points 14 hours ago

Weird, the cartoon doesn’t want to let me through. Something about an iPhone running lemmy pisses off anubus.

[-] Cyber@feddit.uk 1 points 45 minutes ago

To be fair, the link's just to git comments, so the headline captures the main point.

[-] paris@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 12 hours ago

I'm having the same issue on Android. For me, switching to desktop mode to load the Anubis check then back to mobile mode so the website is usable again worked.

[-] bluey@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

works fine on android wih firefox webview

[-] abobla@lemm.ee 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

cartoon? Anubis? What?

(I've never used an iPhone in my life)

[-] muusemuuse@lemm.ee 16 points 13 hours ago

Websites are getting hammered by AI bots stealing content and jacking up their bandwidth usage. So they use a piece of software called Anubis which, for some reason, has a cartoon nurse that will grant or deny you access based on if she thinks you are human or AI. For some reason, she thinks I am AI so I can’t access the article.

[-] Sarcasmo220@lemmy.ml 1 points 19 minutes ago

Or for some reason you are an AI that thinks it's a person.

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Wonder if any of this is the reason why.

Anubis also relies on modern web browser features:

ES6 modules to load the client-side code and the proof-of-work challenge code.
Web Workers to run the proof-of-work challenge in a separate thread to avoid blocking the UI thread.
Fetch API to communicate with the Anubis server.
Web Cryptography API to generate the proof-of-work challenge.
This ensures that browsers are decently modern in order to combat most known scrapers. It's not perfect, but it's a good start.

This will also lock out users who have JavaScript disabled, prevent your server from being indexed in search engines, require users to have HTTP cookies enabled, and require users to spend time solving the proof-of-work challenge.

This does mean that users using text-only browsers or older machines where they are unable to update their browser will be locked out of services protected by Anubis. This is a tradeoff that I am not happy about, but it is the world we live in now.

[-] Eiren@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 17 minutes ago

Any website that blocks users with JS disabled doesn't deserve to be used. Terrible software.

[-] daggermoon@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

I'll take Anubis over Google's capchas

[-] warmaster@lemmy.world 0 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

That cartoon is so misleading, I thought I was deceived and sent to a bogus site.

[-] muusemuuse@lemm.ee 2 points 12 hours ago

Lots of sites use her now

[-] Peasley@lemmy.world 17 points 16 hours ago

Gnome seems to swap out default apps pretty often. Are the old apps getting abandoned? Or are they always jumping to the next cool new thing?

[-] toastmeister@lemmy.ca 27 points 15 hours ago

Here's what I found.

Why does Totem need to be replaced?

Totem is still a GTK3 app and is unmaintained (in part due to a crusty codebase), seeing no major development in years. Replacing it with a modern GTK4/libadwaita app designed to use modern technologies and meet modern needs has been a “high priority” for GNOME.

[-] Peasley@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago
[-] djsaskdja@reddthat.com 4 points 15 hours ago

I don’t think they’re usually abandoned. At least not right away. But they rarely still get feature updates. Mostly just bug fixes. Not sure if it’s just different developers not wanting to stick to the same project of someone else’s code or what.

[-] 4am@lemm.ee 15 points 16 hours ago

Trademark suit from the premium cable channel in 5…4…

[-] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 24 points 19 hours ago

I want to know only one thing: is it based on mpv?

[-] warmaster@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago

Can someone explain pros and cons of MPV vs gstreamer?

[-] gradual@lemmings.world 2 points 19 hours ago

How come they don't just use VLC?

[-] DepressedMan@reddthat.com 24 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

In my opinion, MPV is even better. I mean, it is faster and has better codec support. On the other hand, VLC has a better user interface with a lot of preferences. As for Showtime, oh boy, it's a clear beauty!

For now I'm staying with MPV, because ffmpeg > gstreamer.

[-] emberpunk@lemmy.ml 9 points 13 hours ago

I love VLC. I also love mpv.

I like to think that VLC is for window users for them to get a taste of what it's like to use Linux.

[-] robber@lemmy.ml 6 points 18 hours ago

Doesn't feel gnomey enough.

this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
122 points (99.2% liked)

Linux

54046 readers
1745 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS