494
Well...
Wonder which of these MAGAts stand to profit from that fucking decision/situation...
Everything in the MAGAt world is about fattening their personal pocketbook.
New World Robber Barons all.
🙄 🤡 🖕 🖕
fret not(?), because i'm sure we'll find out the direct link between this decision and those who stand to benefit from it. but nobody will care until it fucks them in the ass.
Scumbags
i feel like there's a much older word in a language i can't speak that describes them much more accurately. edit - that word no longer exists, because history is written by the winners. for now.. i guess from now on it'll just be scribbled in crayon (but mind your stick-figure genders, people!)
I've had a conversation with a couple of trump supporters that are also outdoors people (hunting, fishing, camping). And they use the public lands for most of their hobbies. They told me that this is what would get them to question their vote.
While there are many things that I feel should have gotten them to this question sooner like illegally deporting people, raises prices of everything, etc. etc. But I wonder how many others on the fringe of this cult that are outdoors people this legislation will piss off?
People generally don't change their opinions until they're directly affected, sadly. Hopefully this one wakes a whole bunch of people up, I know among my own conservative acquaintances it'll have a huge impact if they go through with it. Pitiful that this will be a breaking point for so many, but at this point I'll take the wins I can get...
very large swaths of rural America are just like that
very large swaths of ~~rural~~ America are just like that
Cities are generally filled with much more tolerant and liberal folks. What you are implying is false.
Come spend time with me. Like everyone else, they make broad sweeping theoretical statements. Theory and praxis often look different... If you can be bothered.
Lol right. I'm sure they totally won't just move the goalposts like they always fucking do.
That's your land they are stealing. Stealing to give away to their rich friends.
Fuck this. Fuck it all.
Get on the land and start kicking them out. It is not the governments to sell. It belongs to we the people
Based on what I seen on this site and others
"WE THE PEOPLE" are cowards...
Easy to say that from behind a screen
It's easy to spew half-assed "calls to action" from behind a keyboard as well.
Uh huh. When I see you protesting in the streets next to me, I'll care.
Don't be the dipshit associating your protests and your internet personas.
Destroying the planet to own the libs.
nah, they'd be fine destroying the planet anyway. politics just provides them with an enemy. take the enemy away, and they'd just find another way to keep on being the idiotic, annoying contrarians they're destined to be.
With outrageous garbage like this in the bill we can be guaranteed not a single democrat will vote for it, right? RIGHT?
Chuck schumer:
Well they all voted for the internet censorship bill (the only nay votes were from two Republicans) so I'm sure it'll be more than just Schumer voting for it right before they all go on TV and talk about how "concerned" they are with the actions of the Republican party.
Don’t worry, Chuck will send a strongly worded letter and then wash his hands of this.
Checks and balances... Aaaaannnyyy time now....
good news: checks have already been deposited
And the balances (of certain people's bank accounts) are up!
It's what the voters wanted!
Yet another un-undoable action from the MAGAts. Fuck them all - no forgiveness, EVER.
Who says it's undoable? All you need is the balls to go "Nah actually we're taking this back, get fucked"
Which Dem do you see leading that charge? And how long will it be tied up in court?
Nah, it just takes enough people with guns to seize the land.
Hey Republicans, Say goodbye to your favorite pristine hunting and fishing grounds. People don't buy land without plans of developing it.
Putting that R next to your name is the uniform of soulless ghouls. They're the worst of American society, and have been consistently working to undermine this country for decades.
Let's just put all the Republicans in North Dakota, and keep them in one place.
Sounds like something a MAGAt would do.
Stopping at Repulibcan is fine. I think I remember Dubya trying some shit with the national parks.
Only the rich will have money to buy hundreds of billions of federal land.
Endless, insatiable consumption. We are the extinction event.
I had no idea there were fast growing parts of Nevada
Laaaame
I wish we could capture, enslave and sell these people but no one would want them because they're less than useless. Big money loser.
Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives
Whose house? West of where?
this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
494 points (98.8% liked)
News
36529 readers
382 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS