314
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 39 points 6 days ago

No, they did not. They poorly explained their misunderstanding of currency and monetary policy.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 40 points 6 days ago

Painfully obvious “punchline”

[-] Oka@sopuli.xyz 6 points 6 days ago

Not for me!

[-] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 19 points 6 days ago

I'm actually pissed Bitcoin is so deflationary because that incentives people to invest and hold it, and sure that causes the price to rise a ton, but it also lowers the pressure on people to sell it, making it less like a currency and more like an investment.

Satoshi low-key just wanted to be rich, otherwise there wouldn't have been a cap on the number of Bitcoins that can exist

good thing there's other currencies that actually don't suck

[-] green_copper@kbin.earth 8 points 6 days ago

Yea, it is sad to see that many of crypto-coin project are handled as trading assets and not as what it started with: open currency. I would love to see more stability so that cryptocurrencies can be used for buying stuff more easily.

otherwise there wouldn't have been a cap on the number of Bitcoins that can exist

there are other reasons for this: an uncapped coin is inflationary, so it can loose its value given enough time, no matter what happens to the economy around it. But then again, many projects without a cap try to set the emission-rate so that it somewhat balances creation with burn (for example by lost wallets or transactions to invalid addresses).

[-] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago

I really prefer that second option to cause deflation because it allows currencies to be only slightly deflationary, but not too much like bitcoin which has just turned into an investment

[-] Zenoctate@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

I can't believe that Dollar (or any other currency) isn't backed by anything and runs on hopes and believes

[-] Gladaed@feddit.org 49 points 6 days ago

That's reductive.

It's backed by the economic and militaristic might of the issuing country.

[-] atro_city@fedia.io 16 points 6 days ago

Strongest military in the world can't defeat tariffs.

[-] green_copper@kbin.earth 2 points 6 days ago

Did they try to shoot at them though?

[-] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 days ago

and if that doesn't work, try a nuke

[-] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

Anything is only worth as much as someone else wants it. Everything comes down to supply and demand. Currency is just a medium so you don't have to trade fish for lumber in order to trade the lumber for some bacon. Also, pretty convenient to be paid in currency instead of fish, lumber, or bacon. You can use it to directly buy/get what you want.

If no wants to buy or sell the currency then it's a pretty worthless currency. That's why you can't just crate your own currency and buy things with Bob's Bucks.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 days ago

That's... not how that works. It runs on supply and demand, just like gold backed currency, but it's supply and demand for the currency instead of the underlying asset. If you want to control inflation/deflation, fiat is the way.

[-] Zenoctate@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Well I didn't really gave much of a thought when writing. I was narrowminded. This makes sense

[-] anothercatgirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 6 days ago

Currencies often run on tax law. If you earned and produced and imported valuable goods or services, you have to pay tax in your local country's currency.

[-] missingno@fedia.io 10 points 6 days ago

That is how currency typically works, yes. If you want it to be backed by gold or whatever, well then what's the gold backed by? Both the dollar and gold are only valuable because we decided they are, there's not much meaningful difference.

[-] savedbythezsh@sh.itjust.works -1 points 5 days ago

There is much meaningful difference - gold has widespread practical use, while paper currency does not

[-] 0ops@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

Gold's practical value to this day is still dwarfed both by its value as a subjectively pretty metal for jewelry and as an investment/storage of value. If the world at once decided that we'd no longer purchase gold unless we were part of a supply chain making a product with it (like is already the case with most non-money goods), the prices would crater. The number of people holding gold for practical reasons is pretty small, most hold or desire to hold gold because there's near-universal demand for it because everyone else desires to hold gold because there's universal demand because everyone else desires to hold gold... get the picture? Everyone is trying to be someone else's middle-man, and sure some of that gold makes it's way into practical use, but most of it is just the snake eating it's own tail.

That's what makes it effectively no different from paper currency, artificially inflated value is just an inherent property of any money. Any good that becomes money is going to have it's value increase because supply decreased because all or a significant portion of a money's owners own it only to store value without any intention of using it themselves.

[-] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

US dollars are necessary to pay taxes to the US government and, currently, most oil transactions are in US dollars. This use is exponentially larger than the practical use of gold.

[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 8 points 6 days ago

It used to be backed by gold until 1971.

[-] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 7 points 6 days ago

And what was the gold backed by?

[-] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago

being deflationary I think

[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 6 days ago
[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 3 points 6 days ago

Only officially. The US effectivly dropped the gold standard in 1933 because it was making the Great Depression worse. Money was completely stagnant, and the federal worl projects FDR championed to get the economy moving again couldn't be funded when the government couldn't get access to more gold.

And moving away from backed currencies has increased economic stability.

[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 days ago

I think the other answers people are giving are wrong. It's backed by debt and the enforcement of that debt.

[-] magic_lobster_party@fedia.io 4 points 6 days ago

The US dollar gives access to the US market. People want the US dollar because they want to buy things in the US.

Well, that is unless some president enacts some stupid policies.

[-] lurch@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago

they used to back it with gold, didn't they? gues nixon ran out while the printing press went brrrrr

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 15 points 6 days ago

They abandoned the gold standard because it suffered from acute boom and bust cycles.

[-] atro_city@fedia.io 7 points 6 days ago

They abandoned the gold standard because they couldn't mine enough gold to back the amount they were lending.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

Couldn't mine gold in the US. The Soviet Union was the biggest gold producer the world back then. So in effect, the Soviet Union controlled the West's money supply while they were on the gold standard.

[-] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 6 days ago

The boom and bust cycles never went away though. They merely threw up enough barriers for the commoners to believe they are safe, while also locking most commoners out of meaningful participation in the markets.

The USD is backed by the American economy.

[-] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago

You should read that Terry Pratchett book about money. Money? Printing Money? It explains pretty well why money exists and how it's backed. And it's funny.

[-] palmtrees2309@lemm.ee 5 points 6 days ago
[-] lessthanluigi@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 days ago

Stiffy Wilson lol

this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
314 points (89.8% liked)

Greentext

6193 readers
618 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS