176
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 149 points 3 weeks ago

Terrorist. There should never be a story with her name without mentioning that she was a terrorist who was killed in defense of the Capitol building.

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Not a terrorist after a terrorist from there same faction gets into the highest pubic office.

Unfortunately/sadly I'm not even being sarcastic. That is just how it works, what next gens get taught, & what the majority just accepts over time (until the regime change).

We ~~still~~ celebrate plenty of historical monsters.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Words have meaning. Terrorists are terrorists even after they take power. You're not wrong, though.

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I agree but how many people in the west call USA war tactics terrorist?

Terrorist acts, in its core, are what is meant to shock the population, a means of (usually killing the civilian population) achieving the effect on people with less (economically).
Eg nuking civilian population (for terror among the nation) vs nuking the same nations unpopulated areas (or, weeks before that, systematically using incendiary bombs on civilians).

Words have meaning, that is why propaganda changes the narratives/words (sometimes even word definitions).

[-] DiaDeLosMuertos@aussie.zone 64 points 3 weeks ago

How much are her family going to pay to the families of the other deceased from that day ? Maybe all that were incarcerated should be fined millions of dollars to help pay for compensation. Fuckwits the lot of them.

[-] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 63 points 3 weeks ago

There's a paywall on the article, but how the fuck is the woman who attempted to breach a door against armed security and got shot for it entitled to compensation???

[-] BBQuicktime@thelemmy.club 49 points 3 weeks ago

Because she was one of "Dear Leader's" followers. Same reason why the orange fucktard pardoned everybody else who broke into the capitol.

[-] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

So it's not that her family won a court case or anything? The government just decided to give them compensation?

[-] dugmeup@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

No they settled

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

they needed to placate thier rabid magats somehow, this is a way to do it.

[-] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 50 points 3 weeks ago

Why are we giving money to a insurrectionist traitor?

[-] Hazmatastic@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

You know why

[-] Shawdow194@fedia.io 45 points 3 weeks ago

The Justice Department found that there was insufficient evidence to prove Babbitt’s civil rights had been violated, and that it was reasonable for the officer to have believed he was firing in self-defense or in defense of fleeing lawmakers, who were forced to evacuate from a session to certify Trump’s 2020 election loss to Joe Biden.

[-] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 45 points 3 weeks ago

US is so corrupt.

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 34 points 3 weeks ago

What complete bullshit.

[-] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 34 points 3 weeks ago

Why do the systems we depend on to run a fair society always give so much of our taxes to the worst people?

[-] okmko@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

The YouTube creator CGPGrey has a video that's an easy to digest summary of power structures and the incentives throughout. It's the answer to your question.

https://youtu.be/rStL7niR7gs

[-] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago

Are you new here? It's how this has always been.

[-] floo@retrolemmy.com 30 points 3 weeks ago
[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 5 points 3 weeks ago
[-] fritobugger2017@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago

None should have been pardoned and more should have been shot on Jan 6

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 27 points 3 weeks ago

Still paying reparations to traitors, rather than victims.

[-] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 27 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

She must have called that kid in the park an N-word SO MANY TIMES to get that much...

[-] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago

This is the woman who was shot breaking into the capitol building on 1/06/21

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 7 points 3 weeks ago

She must have called that kid at the Capitol an N-word SO MANY TIMES to get that much...

[-] Bwaz@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago
[-] Glytch@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

Because Trump believes she was a patriot who was wrongly killed by capitol police.

[-] giacomo@lemm.ee 20 points 3 weeks ago

for fucking what?

[-] TheDeadlySquid@lemm.ee 16 points 3 weeks ago

“Trump Administration Funds Terrorism” - FIFY

[-] SoupBrick@pawb.social 15 points 3 weeks ago

OH NO, THE GOVERNMENT IS GIVING YOUR HARD EARNED TAX DOLLARS TO ANTIFA!!!

[-] Chozo@fedia.io 9 points 3 weeks ago

Not because Trump gives a fuck about any random dipshit who gave their life for him, but because he knows it paints a target on the backs of the Babbitt family. He wants somebody to try taking their hard-earned tax dollars back from them, because he wants more violence. He's pushing for civil escalations so he can justify martial law.

[-] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

On the up side, maybe this will lead to more Ashli Babbitts

[-] Whirling_Ashandarei@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Orders from on high to settle for a nice tidy sum? Can't exactly trust this justice department.

this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
176 points (95.8% liked)

News

30132 readers
3417 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS