128
submitted 22 hours ago by Pro@programming.dev to c/firefox@lemmy.ml
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SilliusMaximus@mander.xyz 3 points 4 hours ago

Oh nooo.. less bloat? anyway

[-] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Mozilla should make Fakepost source code open-source so that people (with right hardware) can self-host it.

[-] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 10 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

What a terrible day to hear about Fakespot for the first time :(

[-] fireshell@kbin.earth 7 points 11 hours ago

Imagine that someone collected and kept the bookmarks there, and now they will disappear. Another reason to remember that you do not need to store anything important remotely.

[-] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 8 points 11 hours ago

This is why whenever I want to save a news article, I actually save it to my computer as a PDF. Not only can your online bookmark store be shut down, the article itself can be deleted or edited especially if it's a hot button issue.

[-] hellisfulloftacos@lemmy.one 2 points 9 hours ago

I never thought to do this.

[-] fireshell@kbin.earth 2 points 10 hours ago

Setup Miniflux to fetch all my feeds, which I can parse through manually during the day and send over the choice pieces to Wallabag for later reading, either at lunch or at nighttime using my phone or KOReader.

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 59 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

God damnit so they bought Fakespot, an extension that actually did good, hiding fake botted reviews and reanalyzing them - and now they're killing it. It was literally an extension to help prevent unnecessary buying. Why the hell did they even buy it?

We acquired Fakespot in 2023 to help people navigate unreliable product reviews using AI and privacy-first tech. While the idea resonated, it didn’t fit a model we could sustain.

Then why did you buy it you idiots?!

[-] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I'm also exactly on the same boat as you; I use Fakepost frequently and now it will be canned by Mozilla. The alternative I found is https://reviewmeta.com/, but it's quite slow and can't cover all domains of Amazon.

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 2 points 2 hours ago

I'll give it a try, but yeah very disappointed

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 34 points 21 hours ago

I understand retiring Pocket after a long, long run.

But what's up with ending FakeSpot? They just bought that. They spent an undisclosed amount of money and are now abandoning it.

Is the FakeSpot shuttering a sign of money totally wasted, or should I be concerned that the FakeSpot TOS allowed them to sell user data (specifically in the event of an acquisition) right before the Mozilla acquisition?

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 19 points 21 hours ago

It's astounding how stupid that decision was. Fakespot, quite literally a device to help deter people from buying products, was gobbled up by way too much money by Mozilla - who - apparently wanted it to make profit? How?! Why?! Why did they even buy it?

I think it was just executive idiocy. They searched for extensions with the term privacy in them, bought it, and thought it would make their product worth more. I'm getting really tired of companies just sunsetting products the instant they don't make money.

We really need an open version of fakespot.

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 3 points 3 hours ago

Teixeira v Mozilla (2024):

Apart from Firefox, none of Mozilla’s other product offerings were profitable, with the Pocket product notably being allowed to operate in a state of negative profitability for over 5 years before Mr. Teixeira joined Mozilla.

[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 10 points 19 hours ago

I expect that Fakespot already had problems funding themselves, and thus they were a relatively cheap acquisition, and now it turned out they couldn't cover their own costs as part of Mozilla either. But I've never used it so I have no idea.

[-] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 4 points 21 hours ago

what’s up with ending FakeSpot? They just bought that.

Assuming the tool was not accepted and used well enough by the user base. Also Mozilla got all user data and the technology. Maybe they plan on a new project that implements part of it in the future? Mozilla is currently experimenting a lot. Shutting down lot of services should be expected.

[-] lime@feddit.nu 4 points 9 hours ago

it was never available outside the usa i think. hard to get useful market penetration then

[-] Interstellar_1@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 21 hours ago

killedbymozilla.com

Sucks, these were both somewhat useful services (pocket particularly)

[-] zdhzm2pgp@lemmy.ml 5 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I kind of liked visiting https://getpocket.com/explore just to read some of the stories they had posted there, but oh well.

Is Mozilla on its last legs?

EDIT: a more highbrow alternative to the pocket explore articles is Arts & Letters Daily.

[-] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 12 points 21 hours ago

Owho! This was one of the only useful services provided by Mozilla. Well fk it.

[-] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 13 points 21 hours ago

I use pocket to easily sent sites to my e reader.

[-] fireshell@kbin.earth 1 points 11 hours ago

Normally postpone to read in the e-book this is Readeck, Wallabag and LinkWarden (taste and color), I have Self-Hosted Wallabag through KOReader.

[-] TheAgeOfSuperboredom@lemmy.ca 11 points 21 hours ago

Same! This is really unfortunate.

[-] Lemmchen@feddit.org 4 points 21 hours ago

Thank you, I've hated pocked ever since the forced integration.

this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
128 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

19638 readers
292 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS