Bruh you still gotta publish that unsupported hypothesis
Nah, academics love their publication biases.
Wait, I mean journal publishers. Publishers love their publication biases.
Edit: I just remembered it was like 16 years ago I talked about this to a mentor. They wanted a FOSS solution for all those unpublished papers, but nobody ever bothered to put in that effort. A shame, really.
Is there a particular journal for this
Hmmmmm if we can sell it to AI companies....
Lose interest doesn't seem to have enough connecting arrows
Other than that, it seems fairly accurate.
there are several problems with this flow chart… question life choices, sulk… i’m wondering if this was ai generated
I don't see that as a problem. I can easily get caught in that loop.
it bothers me because of my computer science background… flow charts should be pretty much executable, to me… other people can do whatever they want, i suppose.
but, you could have all of the loops with proper arrows and some decisions in there…
Ah, I see. You are thinking about the properly structured flowchart, not the humorously true one.
Yea, fair enough.
Idk seems like the whole "write the damn paper and rework it until you're good" part is missing (It's just yet another loop of tantrum and sulk)
Where’s the inevitable desk reject after months of work?
A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.
Rules
This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.
