83
submitted 2 weeks ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LordCrom@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago

Would they ban the person if it was a pro Israel speech?

If no, then the school admins can fuck right off

[-] xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 weeks ago

it’s not “pro palestine”, it’s not “anti israel”,
it’s anti genocide of palestinians by israelis…
they try to keep framing it as that, as some nationalist thing….

[-] dumptruck@lemmings.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

No, no I am certainly anti-Israel as well; I now fully believe the country should be gone away with like was done in Africa whenever they won their independence back.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] FreeWilliam@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 weeks ago

"You showed the world that MIT wants a free Palestine".

“You called for a permanent ceasefire in Gaza, and you stood in solidarity with the pro-Palestine activists on campus. You faced threats, intimidation, and suppression coming from all directions, especially your own university officials, but you prevailed because the MIT community that I know would never tolerate a genocide."

“Right now, while we prepare to graduate and move forward with our lives, there are no universities left in Gaza..We are watching Israel try to wipe Palestine off the face of the earth, and it is a shame that MIT is a part of it.”

“This means that Israel’s assault on the Palestinian people is not only aided and abetted by our country, but our school. As scientists, engineers, academics, and leaders, we have a commitment to support life, support aid efforts, and call for an arms embargo, and keep demanding, now as alumni, that MIT cuts the ties,"

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

Fucking even MIT gone mega what fhe fuck.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Desperate to prove their fascist bona fides in the hopes of retaining funding. It will come back to bite them. There's no winning way to play this game but there's and honorable and a dishonorable way.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago

Is Harvard the only big boy that stepped up? There has to be more, right?

[-] Pips@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

Most schools aren't talking about it or targeted.

[-] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

MIT owns the majority of the nonvoting shares in Bose. They don't need funding.

[-] albert180@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

Is Bose relevant anymore? Outside of cars I've don't seen any of their systems on sale for a long time

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago

MIT didn't "go maga". They are intrinsically tied to government contracts.

Basically all STEM research at the university level is funded by a mixture of corporate and government interests. Even NSF grants (remember when those were a thing...) tend to focus on areas that anyone with a keen eye can see having military applications. One of my favorites was the massive push for graph analytics 10 or 15 years back and people not realizing that was a roundabout way of saying "analyze social media".

MIT in particular is VERY dependent on this because they need to be "elite". Smaller state universities can shuffle money around and focus on other funding sources, to a degree. MIT can't because their staff inherently have good networks and would jump ship the moment their perks start going away.

Contrast that with Harvard where they still get lots of "donations" from rich and powerful lawyers (and politicians) and where the publicity for "fighting the government" can heavily offset all the international students getting put in a concentration camp before their checks clear.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Most big colleges have helped evict and deport people on studen visas. They cooperate and are complicit.

I'm betting it wouldn't be difficult to find links between MITs research and development labs and weapons and technologies companies involved in Gaza.

Societies are sometimes like big interconnected machines, large parts become complicit in denial, repression, and destruction.

Edit: yep, as expected:

Since at least 2015, MIT laboratories have received millions of dollars from the Israeli Ministry of Defense for projects to develop algorithms that help drone swarms to better pursue escaping targets; to improve underwater surveillance technology; and support military aircraft evade missiles. Two of these sponsorships were renewed since October 7th, 2023, while one came up for renewal in December 2024. Second, MIT maintains institutional collaborations through the ILP, LGO, CSAIL, and MIT Energy Initiative programs with companies that sell vast amounts of weapons to Israel. These include Elbit Systems, Israel’s largest military contractor, as well as Maersk, Lockheed Martin, and Caterpillar. These collaborations grant genocide profiteers privileged access to MIT talent and expertise.

P.S That drone swarm technology is part of why 83% of American doctors who have provided care in Gaza, have reported treating children for being shot in the head. Source: NPR's The American Life.

[-] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

"War is a racket. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives.

...

War like any other racket, pays high dividends to the very few. The cost of operations is always transferred to the people who do not profit."

General Smedley Butler - War is a Racket (1935)

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives.

I'd argue that health insurance also qualifies.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 4 points 2 weeks ago

to better pursue escaping targets

What the fuck.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

First they ignore you,

then they laugh at you,

then they fight you, <-- you are here

then you win.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 11 points 2 weeks ago

"We encourage students inquiry and critical thinking" "no not like that!"

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] GoodOleAmerika@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago
[-] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Wow that's pathetic, so theres no distinction left between MIT and that Bible belt shit hole university that didn't let a student graduate after she came out as gay

[-] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] himmyguap@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Too late. Megha Vemuri already exposed MIT and is a star with her Andor-level speech.

[-] Zanathos@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Strisand effect for sure!

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Self censoring is not the answer... Come on MIT, you know better.

Well, now that I say that, MIT has a not perfect track record when it comes to legal matters and policy decisions. I think of Aaron Swartz for instance...

[-] hakase@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago

Kinda brilliant on the class president's part - still give the speech and get the media coverage for it, but do it before commencement so they're less likely to steal your diploma as a result.

[-] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 4 points 2 weeks ago

Whenever I try to believe things aren't bad and that I am delusional for learning how to gun, stuff like this happens. My hopes for a peaceful and boring future are dying.

[-] thedruid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

DARPA money is a hell of a drug?

I have no idea if this is a real thing or not.

[-] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

If there's one thing I know: any string of random words is likely a project studied or funded by DARPA.

MIT team receives $10.4 million biomanufacturing grant from DARPA With the grant, MIT’s Biomanufacturing Research Program aims to develop new technologies that can rapidly manufacture biologic drugs on the battlefield.

https://news.mit.edu/2013/biomanufacturing-research-program-grant-0918

So, yeah, DARPA money for drugs is a drug for MIT.

Old article. But... There's lots out there.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=darpa+.mil+.edu+mit+drugs

[-] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

I'm sure a lot of questions would be answered by checking the universities donations.

[-] diffusive@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Research needs money for happening. You need to pay researchers, structures, various staff. Even more so a fancy structure as MIT

Israel (and American Zionists) have the power to cancel a sizeable amount of research contracts with MIT. (AIPAC shows how well organised they are, originally for defence from antisemitism, now for defence from… Palestine? I guess? 🤷‍♂️ )

Then for MIT (that is a corporation like another) comes to damage control. On one hand PR, on the other money.

MIT took the money, Stanford (in the case of DEI) took the PR.

I am still 100% sure neither of the two can give a damn of Palestinians, Israel or DEI. It’s just MBA stuff 🤷‍♂️

(I have my opinions on the situation in Palestine but I don’t want this post to be about that)

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

Massachusetts Institute of Terror

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
83 points (97.7% liked)

News

30249 readers
2041 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS