505
submitted 1 month ago by neme@lemm.ee to c/music@lemmy.world
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 109 points 1 month ago

My dude, you aren't suing a small blogger, but an evil corporation worth over $1.5 trillion. Aim higher!

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 104 points 1 month ago

I don't think he needs the money. This seems more like a cut that shit out and start the ball rolling for everyone else to sue.

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 57 points 1 month ago

He doesn't, but evil corporations only respond to one thing: money.

The more you can take from them, the more it hurts them. They already do it to us, including ripping off his songs, so fight back if you have the money to spend on lawyers!

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Yes, a lawsuit, a fine, etc are all "cost of doing business." If it costs a million dollars a year to use eminem's music, but engages 150 million of their 2 billion users into engagement and ad revenue that nets 50 million dollars, it was a very lucrative payment to eminem, and now they will certainly be willing to do the same for other popular artists at that price point.

[-] x00z@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Maybe it's just the actual damages.

Suing in America is funny because they always want as much as possible.

[-] meliodas_101@lemmy.world 82 points 1 month ago

Why is everyone focusing on the number. It's going to set the record that artist's can sue corporate for using their work unfairly.

I mean, Zuck personally made that much money every 6 minutes last year - when sleeping, eating, basking in the sun on a hot rock...

But the real answer is that the article itself is not good reporting.

Copyright claimants will typically request the statutory wilful infringement amount ($150,000 per work) in the court complaint, but will also have a catch-all for actual damages and profits. Proving that at trial can make this much higher. Some plaintiffs put a $10 million or $100 million or $1 billion number in their documents to make headlines. But this reporter presumably is not familiar with this practice, so is underselling the risk here.

[-] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Been going after individual users long enough I guess

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago

Why is everyone focusing on the number.

Because this is Lemmy. Any actual action that harms the corporations must be mocked and dismissed. Only empty posturing and Internet-tough-guy-ism is allowed.

[-] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 49 points 1 month ago

Wow, a WHOLE million? They're sure to learn their lesson.

/s, just in case.

[-] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

You dont just get to decide how much to sue for (well, you can try but good luck if there's no base for your number)

[-] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 44 points 1 month ago

The number is probably set just high enough to force meta to respond with lawyers who have an actual payroll. $1M is nothing, but if they roll over, then every other artist will do the same. Meta will need to fight this in courts. It will cost them money to do so.

Eminem can make an album about it afterwards. And he doesn't look super greedy. And other artists might win because of him.

[-] grillme@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago

It says statutory right in the article. $150k seems like the legal limit per song.

[-] aceshigh@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

I’d be disappointed if he didn’t make a record after it.

[-] rem26_art@fedia.io 40 points 1 month ago

The article says that Meta claims they got the rights through some third party firm that, his publisher claims had no right to authorize the distribution of their music. If that turns out to be the case, I wonder how many of the other artists that you can choose when you want to make a Reel or whatever also would fall under this same circumstance?

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Hey, you wanna license the Beatles? I'm your guy

$3.50 a pop.

[-] Reckless_Moose@ttrpg.network 23 points 1 month ago

Well it was about that time that I noticed that the Beetles Agent was about 8 stories tall and a crustacean from the protozoic era

[-] rem26_art@fedia.io 8 points 1 month ago

Throw in a couple of Nirvana tracks and you got yourself a deal

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago

Meta: "Ooooooh! A whole million dollars!"

[-] raltoid@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Exceed $1 Million

That is effectively pocket change to both parties. This isn't about money, but the legal precedent.

[-] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 month ago

Hell yeah, get their asses Slim!

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago
[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

I think that's how much Zuckerberg tips the person who washes his testicles for him.

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

Testiclean is a wholly owned subordinate of Meta. He doesn't tip.

[-] choking_the_dolphin@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 month ago

You wouldn't believe how much he pays his taint washer.

[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago

A million.

Cost of doing business for them. They won't even blink.

[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago
[-] Ignot@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Is that Eminem Che Guevara?

[-] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago

it's his new look since around 2016ish. I've gotten quite used to it, actually, and I think it fits him quite a bit

[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 1 month ago

If I just saw him out of the corner of my eye, I would think it's actually Justin Timberlake.

[-] ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

Did he forget how to spell billions?

[-] Gryficowa@szmer.info 2 points 1 month ago
[-] Damage@feddit.it -2 points 1 month ago

He looks fucking weird, is it the plastic surgery?

[-] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Nah, it's the weird beard

~this~ ~is~ ~a~ ~reference~

[-] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

why you yellin at the mic

[-] 474D@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

He's a grandfather now, people age. This isn't slim shady

[-] TachyonTele@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago

that's called facial hair.

this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
505 points (99.6% liked)

Music

9763 readers
37 users here now

↳ Our family Communities:

➰#Music

Music.world - !music@lemmy.world

Jazz -!jazz@lemmy.world

Album Art Porn - !albumartporn@lemmy.world

Fake Album Covers - !fakealbumcovers@lemm.ee

Obscure Music - !ObscureMusic@lemm.ee

Vinyl and LP's - !vinyl@lemmy.world

Electronic Dance Music - !edm@reddthat.com

60's Music - !60smusic@lemmy.world

70's Music - !70smusic@lemmy.world

80's Music - !80smusic@lemmy.world

90's Music - !90smusic@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS