783
I believe him, I also believe that Nintendo has secret rooms of deaf kids somewhere. No clue what they'd use them for. But if the news broke that someone found a dungeon owned by Nintendo full of deaf kids i wouldn't be surprised.
Man, I miss Nintendo's Iwata/Reggie age. Those guys had vision beyond just endless profits.
Well the shareholders can't have that. It gets in the way of their endless profits.
Would be useful for accessibility test
Mostly recreational purposes I assume
If Nintendo was based in the US I'd have included that possibility in my post above.
Under delivering yet again Sean. I want my deaf children!
They are great for stress relief. You can yell at them all fuckin day.
Acknowledged! Dead children will now spawn in your game as requested. ...you weirdo.
LET THE BODIES HIT THE FLOOR!
LET THE BODIES HIT THE FLOOR!
LET THE BODIES HIT THE FLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOR!
load more comments
(1 replies)
it's crazy to me that for all the ai "advances" in the past few years nobody has thought to improve subtitling.
Poor deaf kids. Not because they're being held captive but because they're relying on shitty automatic captions.
For example, Czech was only added very recently and the captions really suck, they change the meaning of most sentences and even include spelling errors.
Everyone making scripted videos should at least:
- go through their script to convert it into a transcript (match what's actually been said – looking at you CGP Grey – and remove visual cues)
- upload it for YouTube's auto-timing (which is not perfect but we'll take it)
Too bad the FCC's captioning act is toothless, even TV stations (like HBO) uploading their content to YouTube don't bother importing captions even though they're legally required to.
I’m sure they have… they just aren’t currently incentivized to do so
Andrew Ng did a video when he gradually added noise to the training audio to improve the quality.
But here we are dealing with homophones so it's not just turning speech to text, it also needs to be context aware.
Possible but too expensive to implement automatically.
context awareness is the entire point of language models tho :(
I'm highlighting that speech to text and context awareness are different skills.
YouTube is unlikely to waste loads of compute power on subtitles that don't need it just to capture the occasional edge case.
i mean, it's a one-time-per-video thing. they already do tons of processing on every upload.
So if you can reduce compute there then you save money.
There is no technical difficulty. It's a business decision.
right now they're dynamically generating subtitles every time. that's way more compute.
load more comments
(2 replies)
it would be an improvement. thats not what we are doing anymore
new tech is there to make everyone more miserable
My student friend tells me that the auto-generated captions for non-English MS Teams lecture recordings recently have improved significantly and have even become usable.
not for my language. they are hilariously bad.
It's even worse for captions.
Captions and subtitles aren't even the same thing.
In fact, most DVD players don't even pass the code captioning through HDMI ports, so old captioned DVDs don't work anymore.
i too watched that technology connections video
~~explain.~~ edited with explanation. i've seen the technology connections video, thanks.
my comment is still about the actual post above, and i was specifically thinking about auto-generated subs rather than, say, movies. apparently that's not obvious.
Probably because a lot of countries either dub the content or it is already in their native laguage. You generally see a lot of subtitles on OpenSubtitles of countries like The Netherlands where that doesn't happen
on youtube and twitter?!
Auto generated subtitles don't sell ads and don't aquire personal data.
No, but on the fields where there is money to be made for subtitles, like movies and tv shows.
what does that have to do with the OP though?
Where do you think money for development of new shit comes from? From places where money is made, like TV, movies etc. YouTube doesn't really make more money because the ads are there.
And Twitter hahaha I can only laugh at that
...i feel like you're having a different conversation than i am.
it’s crazy to me that for all the ai “advances” in the past few years nobody has thought to improve subtitling.
That's what OP say, I just responded with the reason why that wasn't being done. Aka money
load more comments
(1 replies)
Sounds like what someone would say if they were hiding deaf kids.
greedy nintendo hoarding all the deaf kids to themselves
OH, now we're too high and mighty to have a deaf kid closet? Fame changes people.
Fucking woke bullshit. (/s because someone is gonna think I'm serious)
How has speech to text gotten so bad. Dictation and keyboard taps are just going to hell with AI.
The AI bros refuse to even allow proof reading and corrections.
I've never had voice commands work right for my speech. Something I had to demonstrate every time my friends ask why I won't use the speech commands on their TV.
Speech interpretation just doesn't work for everyone and I personally refuse to alter how I speak for a computer.
Same here, if this PoS computer can't handle me at my best 12 beers in, it does not deserve me at my worst, sober!
Aaron? Iron urn?
nokidsseesky
WHAT?
Found one.
this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
783 points (99.0% liked)
People Twitter
7449 readers
2005 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS