1368
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 85 points 2 days ago

this type of science-discovery to usefulness-realization latency is the norm, pretty sure Curie didn't envision nuclear power plants

[-] mmmm@sopuli.xyz 49 points 2 days ago

I suppose it's like asking a biologist what type of dishes would they do with a plant species they just discovered

[-] xylol@leminal.space 36 points 2 days ago

Is that not what drives biologists, trying to eat new discoveries before someone else

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

Darwin ate every damned thing he came across.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lobut@lemmy.ca 60 points 2 days ago

There's a good NPR podcast in the same vein as this: https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2017/06/21/533840751/episode-779-shrimp-fight-club

It's about congressman talking about government waste and targeting the sciences. It's like, you don't get the "cool" applications without the "weird" research. I'm doing a horrible job describing it, but I thought it was a good listen.

[-] jollyrogue@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Oh yeah. No one appreciates blue sky research. We don’t know where the question will take us, which is why governments fund the research. They can take on the 0.1% chance something useful is created 20 years later.

[-] hobovision@lemm.ee 15 points 2 days ago

Planet Money has some really good episodes. Unfortunately, a lot of filler as well.

[-] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago

I feel like this is a very "scientisty" thing - the theoretical aspect is so fascinating and being able to fit all the pieces into a model that is mathematically accurate is the reward.

Considering the practical application of the model and how it can benefit society (or in other words, be marketed for profit) takes a different set of skills.

[-] Crankenstein@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

I absolutely detest the equivocation of "benefits society" and "marked for profit".

Plenty of things have been discovered to have practical applications which can benefit society yet are shelved or have its implementation frustrated because it cannot be exploited for profit or threatens the profits of a preexisting application which it would replace.

[-] fossilesque@mander.xyz 28 points 1 day ago
[-] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 10 points 1 day ago

Half of the field is viable thanks to a single algorithm: FFT

[-] Hugin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

FFT was a DARPA project. It alone probably makes all their funding worth it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago

This may be an even better example than the positron. Originally a theoretical antimatter form of the common electron, with no practical application.

Turned out to be a vital tool for medical imaging. If you or someone you know has ever had a PET scan, now you know what the P stands for.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 15 points 2 days ago

I always thought it stood for "pepperoni." So, you're saying "PET" stands for "Positrons, Endives, and Tomatoes"?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] pastel_de_airfryer@lemmy.eco.br 27 points 2 days ago

And this is why science shouldn't be beheld to the whims of politicians and capitalists

[-] manxu@piefed.social 25 points 2 days ago

I mean, why would a guy that started a car rental company know anything about radio waves?

Gotcha!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 20 points 2 days ago

~~Aperture~~ Science! We do what we must because we can!

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
1368 points (99.9% liked)

Science Memes

15223 readers
1156 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS