209
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] manxu@piefed.social 25 points 1 month ago

The only thing more important than "do nothing wrong" is to loudly correct those who are doing "almost right" and "in the right direction."

[-] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I think it's a tossup between "loudly correct" and "vilify as a disappointing libshit."

[-] Zexks@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

And sometimes those people will even destroy active progress because it doesn't meet their definition of perfect.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Dogyote@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 month ago

I think this "do nothing wrong" tendency has something to do with intragroup power dynamics. I've often seen it used as a cudgel to knock down others within a group and stop mild dissent even though everyone is on the same team. Usually the most prolific wielder of the "do nothing wrong" cudgel rises to a position of some authority in the group, after which the group fragments because the person is insufferable but unassailable due to their moral superiority.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] naught101@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Very good take.

I complained to a partner once about something they'd done that seemed vaguely unethical (by my understanding of their ethics). After they apologised, I was still upset, and they said "maybe I'm a little bit shit, just like everyone else."

That really stuck with me. People (including myself) are often OK with accepting imperfections in other people in some spaces, but not in others. It's pretty weird.. Life is messy, even the bits that seems straightforward. And no one has a perfect understanding of any situation..

[-] confusedpuppy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 month ago

I had an interaction once where I thought I used double quotes around a word to imply something obvious related to the posted article. A random person got mad at me and claimed I knew nothing about solidarity.

I felt insulted, they didn't know my life experiences up to that point. I chose to ignore my feelings and pressed them to teach my why I was so wrong. They eventually disappeared from replies because they had nothing behind that image of righteousness. Rare win but I'll take it.

If someone put themselves in harms way to punch an authoritarian follower in the face in my defence and also uses slurs I could find offensive to myself, that's not my enemy. That's someone awesome who could use a little more education. Later. When the current situation isn't so wild.

Words are just words. That's not as effective as punching a fascist in face.

[-] SadSadSatellite@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago

Reminded me of an old meme I saw in like 2009.

CW homophobic slur

[-] Charapaso@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Also a content warning for a couple slurs, but the point from Patton Oswalt a while back is roughly the same: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkKo1_RP_0c

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I haved discussions with others here where its people are just not happy with baby steps and want full change right away. Problem is we need to make more friends not enemies with each other.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I've started to make a habit on the internet to make amends and give grace to people who get upset in the comments as fast as possible. Textual online spaces are seemingly quite prone to disagreement, so it's a huge help just to mindfully counteract that tendency.

[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 2 points 1 month ago

Well easy for you my brave little Hitachi wand! Who can stay angry at you!

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

It helps if you're fun.

[-] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Ball big. Need lots of hands. Take long time move. Come. Help. Roll big ball with us.

[-] naught101@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Also, we don't actually know which way we need to roll it. Some people have strong ideas, other understand the vague direction but there's lots of invisible obstacles strewn across the landscape, and whenever we hit one there are a hundred different people with a thousand different explanations about what the fuck just happened.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Gatekeeping, purity testing, virtue signaling, and no self accountability. These are the four reasons why every leftist space outside of the center left is a complete and utter joke. These traits are cultural in left wing spaces, and they are very common. They are so common that they'll never be going away and they are the root reasons why the left will NEVER accomplish anything substantial during my lifetime.

[-] Rooty@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

An alarming number of leftists are not revolutionaries but dictators without power.

[-] SereneSadie@lemmy.myserv.one 5 points 1 month ago

Every time I see the idiots calling for abolishment of the police, I never see anything remotely approaching a viable replacement for what they should be doing.

We're not solving murder, rape, burglaries, drunk driving, general assaults, etc overnight. And we're certainly not within a five year plan of solving those things either.

So yeah, hardline abolishment fanatics can shove off. Come back with actual solutions, even if they arent perfect, thanks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

some people are all 'the system is broken' and other people are like 'the system is working exactly as intended' and im just screaming 'DID YOU OR DID YOU NOT VOTE IN THE LAST ELECTION?'

[-] rhvg@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

online leftist

Important things happen offline, online is more or less a distraction.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I don't know if that's really true anymore. Or, maybe more accurately, I think we're in between when that was true in the pre-social media age and when it'll be true again after the social web breathes its last. There are just too many ways that megacorps, bad actors, and foreign agents can manipulate offline activity with online action.

Some of those things are manipulating small groups into large-scale action (see: Qanon), but misinformation and meme warfare also have a measurable effect on election, direct action, etc. Not to mention that local organization is best done online, and that has a very real effect.

Now, is offline action more important than online action? Absolutely, and if you're saying that being an "online leftist" (as an identity) is a distraction, I think I agree with you. But online action is more than just a distraction, and to ignore it is probably counterproductive.

[-] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 4 points 1 month ago

Trump is literally a 4chan meme gone too far, homie.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

obviously a trap set by bougie liberals to try and get me to vote for a Democrat.

but i'm too smart for them

[-] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

the other problem with leftist spaces online is a general intolerance to trolls

[-] ipitco@lemmy.super.ynh.fr 6 points 1 month ago

Or rather the "I don't agree with you therefore you're a troll"

[-] Tuxman@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

The ONLY time I’ve been muted by anyone was on the Fediverse 😅 (Still can’t wrap my head around how petty the argument was…)

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ipitco@lemmy.super.ynh.fr 4 points 1 month ago

I believe it's actually the opposite. So many extremists or "I don’t agree with you therefore you’re a troll" bullshit.

You get censored and banned for pretty much anything. Lemmy is no exception and pretty obviously like that.

[-] XM34@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago

I would even go as far as to argue Lemmy is a prime example of this.

load more comments (25 replies)
[-] daggermoon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

This is what I've been saying. The gatekeeping is unreal. How the fuck are we supposed to grow as a movement if we can't accept those who maybe did and/or said some questionable shit in the past? If someone is trying to make positive changes and is demonstrating it with their actions and/or words than we should accept them. I guarantee the vast majority of you here have said or did something that goes against your current beliefs.

[-] Fridgeratr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

No improving the current system allowed!

[-] mlg@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yes let's start a 3rd party

wave of downvotes and idiots screaming about RCV even though that's not a disqualifier

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

But you’ll continue to support democrats in higher offices until your third party has support in lower offices and a functioning party structure, right?

[-] glimse@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

No!!! The lesser of two evils is still evil so I'd rather vote for a weak 3rd party candidate to help secure the win for the more evil candidate

[-] AccountMaker@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 month ago

If it were only that, but traditionally 3rd party candidates are all the rage 2 weeks before the US elections, and then the day after the elections they're gone from the discourse, and you'll hear nothing about them for the next 4 years.

[-] glimse@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Jill Stein is like a 4-year cicada cycle. She emerges, screams for awhile, then disappears again

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

At first I didn't think you were left enough but you just proved me wrong.

[-] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago

Welcome to the salty spitoon. How left are ya?

[-] makyo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I spent a bunch of time in such spaces before the election and was shocked how much time and energy was squandered with virtue signaling and purity testing. There was literally no room for anything else in some of them.

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I would say largest problem with leftist spaces is a little more challenging to identify; it's that leftists are broadly intellectuals or at least identify as intellectual because of effort they put into honoring nuance. And the primary opponent of leftists are conservatives, and they are proudly not intellectual and view people who use the lens of intellectualism and nuance as weak or elitist.

Because it's incredibly difficult to have any kind of meaningful intellectual debate with your opponents, we have all retreated to our safe-spaces and online bubbles, our discord groups and algorithm-driven feeds. We don't even walk in the same environments or view the same media anymore,

So in order for people on the left to feel any kind of satisfaction and feel like their mental strength actually has a use, they find someone else who is ostensibly on the left and attack something that person said or did which they feel does not represent their own leftist values.

Our eternal, infernal infighting problem is because we have an army of head-warriors who have no heads to butt against. Even if there were people on the right willing to have intellectual debates, they're not even in the same talking-space anymore. The only place you can go to have debates are contentious battleground where nobody is even arguing in good faith and just screaming their talking points for audience upvotes. So leftists, being humans, take the easy path and turn on each other to feel like they're making any progress or are involved at all in making things better.

On the right it's much easier to feel like you're part of the movement or doing something for your group, all you have to do is buy a gun or stockpile trumpcoins and canned food or harass someone or get drunk and scream about minorities. It's mindless and pointless but it feels like action. And sadly, more and more people are being turned away by this kind of mental effort and emotional labor of "doing the right thing" so they're getting sucked in by the mindless orcs who have more fun and have easier victory conditions.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

it's that leftists are broadly intellectuals

I used to think this. Then everyone came out about how Kamala didn't get them excited, aka appeal to their emotions. When I pointed this out and that they weren't thinking logically and instead relying on emotions they frankly agreed, saying something something not a robot. And there were proud of it.

[-] naught101@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Is being an intellectual mutually exclusive with having emotions? Because as far as I know all people have emotions..

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
209 points (97.3% liked)

Political Memes

9038 readers
450 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS