56
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DiggyDiggyMole@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

The headline in the news banner just had impeccable comedic timing: "First next-gen superheavy possibly under construction" a few seconds after the rocket exploded

[-] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Yeah it did. Wowsers!

Holy fuck. When was this? The last time something like this happened at Starbase was before the integrated flight tests started. With this, plus the recent suborbital Starship failures, it's really not looking great for the program.

[-] fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

There’s a timestamp in the photo. Yesterday at 23:00 CDT.

[-] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago

That's a glorious boom

But that's why they do testing, it's cheaper to boom on testbed than on a launch pad or in the air

[-] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

But the idea behind doing things with the risk of them going boom is to learn things. I'm not sure they're learning what they need if they're going from testing Starship in launches to going back to static firing. If the idea is to rework the engines for Starship, I have to wonder if that's a fundamental enough step to put the entire project back to pretty much square one.

[-] chloroken@lemmy.ml -3 points 3 days ago

Could you possibly whitewash this any harder?

[-] dwindling7373@feddit.it 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I don't think that means whet you think it means.

[-] chloroken@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

What do you think whitewash means?

[-] dwindling7373@feddit.it 0 points 1 day ago

Covering up the truth by means of displaying fake information, like saying it doesn't apply here because there was no data involved and the source was not a political entity.

[-] chloroken@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Thanks for the vocabulary suggestion and modified definition, but my usage of the term was just fine.

[-] foggenbooty@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Agreed. "Spin" would be the better word.

It's another embarrassment added to a long list of embarrassments at this point. SpaceX has utterly failed to deliver on its contracts and at some point people need to recognize that the private sector does not always do it better. Especially when the company is run by a conman.

[-] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

And our tax dollars.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
56 points (98.3% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8164 readers
185 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS